Brian Vadasz, Taylor Zak, Jonathan Aldinger, Madina Sukhanova, Juehua Gao, Kristy Lucile Wolniak, Yi-Hua Chen, Qing Ching Chen, Shuo Ma, Hamza Tariq
{"title":"\"加速 \"的慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(CLL/SLL):在新型疗法时代揭开 CLL/SLL 的生物灰色地带。","authors":"Brian Vadasz, Taylor Zak, Jonathan Aldinger, Madina Sukhanova, Juehua Gao, Kristy Lucile Wolniak, Yi-Hua Chen, Qing Ching Chen, Shuo Ma, Hamza Tariq","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03920-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accelerated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (A-CLL/SLL) is a histologically aggressive subtype of CLL/SLL that lies in between conventional CLL/SLL (C-CLL/SLL) and Richter transformation (RT) on the biological spectrum. Although the histologic criteria for A-CLL/SLL were defined 14 years ago, the clinical and genetic characteristics and survival outcomes of these patients have yet to be studied in the era of novel therapies. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic, genetic, and survival characteristics of 34 patients with confirmed tissue diagnosis of A-CLL/SLL and compared them with 120 patients with C-CLL/SLL. Patients with A-CLL/SLL had significantly higher frequencies of B-symptoms, anemia and thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, higher LDH, and more advanced Rai stages. A-CLL/SLL showed a significantly higher frequency of TP53 mutations (55.0% vs. 11.5%;p < 0.0001) and deletions (38.2% vs. 8.3%;p < 0.0001), lower isolated del(13q) (5.8% vs. 27.5%;p < 0.0001), and increased incidence of RT (11.76% vs. 0.83%;p = 0.0025). The overall survival of patients with A-CLL/SLL was significantly lower than C-CLL/SLL (median survival: 6.17 years vs. not reached; 2 and 5-year survival rates: 75.5% vs. 94.7% and 53.3% vs. 93.7%, respectively; p < 0.0001); however, novel agents have improved the outcomes dramatically compared to the previously published data in the pre-BTKi era. Our results support the categorization of A-CLL/SLL as a distinct biologically aggressive subtype of CLL/SLL and highlight the need to revise the diagnostic criteria utilizing a multifaceted approach that integrates the overall pathobiological profile of the disease, in addition to the histology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Accelerated\\\" chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL): unraveling the biological gray zone of CLL/SLL in the era of novel therapies.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Vadasz, Taylor Zak, Jonathan Aldinger, Madina Sukhanova, Juehua Gao, Kristy Lucile Wolniak, Yi-Hua Chen, Qing Ching Chen, Shuo Ma, Hamza Tariq\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-024-03920-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accelerated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (A-CLL/SLL) is a histologically aggressive subtype of CLL/SLL that lies in between conventional CLL/SLL (C-CLL/SLL) and Richter transformation (RT) on the biological spectrum. Although the histologic criteria for A-CLL/SLL were defined 14 years ago, the clinical and genetic characteristics and survival outcomes of these patients have yet to be studied in the era of novel therapies. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic, genetic, and survival characteristics of 34 patients with confirmed tissue diagnosis of A-CLL/SLL and compared them with 120 patients with C-CLL/SLL. Patients with A-CLL/SLL had significantly higher frequencies of B-symptoms, anemia and thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, higher LDH, and more advanced Rai stages. A-CLL/SLL showed a significantly higher frequency of TP53 mutations (55.0% vs. 11.5%;p < 0.0001) and deletions (38.2% vs. 8.3%;p < 0.0001), lower isolated del(13q) (5.8% vs. 27.5%;p < 0.0001), and increased incidence of RT (11.76% vs. 0.83%;p = 0.0025). The overall survival of patients with A-CLL/SLL was significantly lower than C-CLL/SLL (median survival: 6.17 years vs. not reached; 2 and 5-year survival rates: 75.5% vs. 94.7% and 53.3% vs. 93.7%, respectively; p < 0.0001); however, novel agents have improved the outcomes dramatically compared to the previously published data in the pre-BTKi era. Our results support the categorization of A-CLL/SLL as a distinct biologically aggressive subtype of CLL/SLL and highlight the need to revise the diagnostic criteria utilizing a multifaceted approach that integrates the overall pathobiological profile of the disease, in addition to the histology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03920-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03920-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Accelerated" chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL): unraveling the biological gray zone of CLL/SLL in the era of novel therapies.
Accelerated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (A-CLL/SLL) is a histologically aggressive subtype of CLL/SLL that lies in between conventional CLL/SLL (C-CLL/SLL) and Richter transformation (RT) on the biological spectrum. Although the histologic criteria for A-CLL/SLL were defined 14 years ago, the clinical and genetic characteristics and survival outcomes of these patients have yet to be studied in the era of novel therapies. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic, genetic, and survival characteristics of 34 patients with confirmed tissue diagnosis of A-CLL/SLL and compared them with 120 patients with C-CLL/SLL. Patients with A-CLL/SLL had significantly higher frequencies of B-symptoms, anemia and thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, higher LDH, and more advanced Rai stages. A-CLL/SLL showed a significantly higher frequency of TP53 mutations (55.0% vs. 11.5%;p < 0.0001) and deletions (38.2% vs. 8.3%;p < 0.0001), lower isolated del(13q) (5.8% vs. 27.5%;p < 0.0001), and increased incidence of RT (11.76% vs. 0.83%;p = 0.0025). The overall survival of patients with A-CLL/SLL was significantly lower than C-CLL/SLL (median survival: 6.17 years vs. not reached; 2 and 5-year survival rates: 75.5% vs. 94.7% and 53.3% vs. 93.7%, respectively; p < 0.0001); however, novel agents have improved the outcomes dramatically compared to the previously published data in the pre-BTKi era. Our results support the categorization of A-CLL/SLL as a distinct biologically aggressive subtype of CLL/SLL and highlight the need to revise the diagnostic criteria utilizing a multifaceted approach that integrates the overall pathobiological profile of the disease, in addition to the histology.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.