团队多样性与团队绩效:通往协同效应和破坏效应之路。

IF 6.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101877
{"title":"团队多样性与团队绩效:通往协同效应和破坏效应之路。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Team diversity holds promises and challenges for team performance. The promise of diversity lies in synergy generated from exchange and integration of diverse perspectives; the challenge lies in social categorization processes that give rise to biases favoring similar others over dissimilar others that disrupt team collaboration. I discuss theory capturing these paths to synergetic and disruptive effects and their contingencies as well as the evidence in research in team diversity and performance. I conclude that the evidence is consistent with the theory, but increasingly suffers from proliferation of moderators and mediators without integrative efforts to consolidate accumulating insights. I also identify theoretical parallels between the study of diversity and demographic dissimilarity as opportunity to develop integrative theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Team diversity and team performance: Paths to synergetic and disruptive effects\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Team diversity holds promises and challenges for team performance. The promise of diversity lies in synergy generated from exchange and integration of diverse perspectives; the challenge lies in social categorization processes that give rise to biases favoring similar others over dissimilar others that disrupt team collaboration. I discuss theory capturing these paths to synergetic and disruptive effects and their contingencies as well as the evidence in research in team diversity and performance. I conclude that the evidence is consistent with the theory, but increasingly suffers from proliferation of moderators and mediators without integrative efforts to consolidate accumulating insights. I also identify theoretical parallels between the study of diversity and demographic dissimilarity as opportunity to develop integrative theory.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000903\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000903","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

团队多样性为团队绩效带来了希望和挑战。多样性的前景在于不同观点的交流与融合所产生的协同效应;而挑战则在于社会分类过程,这种过程会产生偏好相似者而非不同者的偏见,从而破坏团队协作。我将讨论捕捉这些产生协同效应和破坏效应的途径及其偶然性的理论,以及团队多样性和绩效研究中的证据。我的结论是,这些证据与理论是一致的,但由于调节因素和中介因素激增,而没有综合努力来巩固积累的见解,因此这些证据越来越受到影响。我还指出了多样性研究与人口异质性研究之间的理论相似之处,认为这是发展综合理论的契机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Team diversity and team performance: Paths to synergetic and disruptive effects

Team diversity holds promises and challenges for team performance. The promise of diversity lies in synergy generated from exchange and integration of diverse perspectives; the challenge lies in social categorization processes that give rise to biases favoring similar others over dissimilar others that disrupt team collaboration. I discuss theory capturing these paths to synergetic and disruptive effects and their contingencies as well as the evidence in research in team diversity and performance. I conclude that the evidence is consistent with the theory, but increasingly suffers from proliferation of moderators and mediators without integrative efforts to consolidate accumulating insights. I also identify theoretical parallels between the study of diversity and demographic dissimilarity as opportunity to develop integrative theory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
期刊最新文献
Disability-based discrimination in organizations Why scarcity can both increase and decrease prosocial behaviour: A review and theoretical framework for the complex relationship between scarcity and prosociality From trendsetters to second movers: Commitments as catalysts for social change Mathematical frameworks for the analysis of norms Discrimination in organizations on the basis of age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1