"从一开始就这样想":为接受姑息关怀的人制定处方决策--对医护人员观点的定性探索。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01523-2
Anna Robinson-Barella, Charlotte Lucy Richardson, Zana Bayley, Andy Husband, Andy Bojke, Rona Bojke, Catherine Exley, Barbara Hanratty, Joanna Elverson, Jesse Jansen, Adam Todd
{"title":"\"从一开始就这样想\":为接受姑息关怀的人制定处方决策--对医护人员观点的定性探索。","authors":"Anna Robinson-Barella, Charlotte Lucy Richardson, Zana Bayley, Andy Husband, Andy Bojke, Rona Bojke, Catherine Exley, Barbara Hanratty, Joanna Elverson, Jesse Jansen, Adam Todd","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01523-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deprescribing has been defined as the planned process of reducing or stopping medications that may no longer be beneficial or are causing harm, with the goal of reducing medication burden while improving patient quality of life. At present, little is known about the specific challenges of decision-making to support deprescribing for patients who are accessing palliative care. By exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals, this qualitative study aimed to address this gap, and explore the challenges of, and potential solutions to, making decisions about deprescribing in a palliative care context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals in-person or via video call, between August 2022 - January 2023. Perspectives on approaches to deprescribing in palliative care; when and how they might deprescribe; and the role of carers and family members within this process were discussed. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis enabled the development of themes. QSR NVivo (Version 12) facilitated data management. Ethical approval was obtained from the NHS Health Research Authority (ref 305394).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty healthcare professionals were interviewed, including: medical consultants, nurses, specialist pharmacists, and general practitioners (GPs). Participants described the importance of deprescribing decision-making, and that it should be a considered, proactive, and planned process. Three themes were developed from the data, which centred on: (1) professional attitudes, competency and responsibility towards deprescribing; (2) changing the culture of deprescribing; and (3) involving the patient and family/caregivers in deprescribing decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study sought to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals with responsibility for making deprescribing decisions with people accessing palliative care services. A range of healthcare professionals identified the importance of supporting decision-making in deprescribing, so it becomes a proactive process within a patient's care journey, rather than a reactive consequence. Future work should explore how healthcare professionals, patients and their family can be supported in the shared decision-making processes of deprescribing.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Ethical approval was obtained from the NHS Health Research Authority (ref 305394).</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Starting to think that way from the start\\\": approaching deprescribing decision-making for people accessing palliative care - a qualitative exploration of healthcare professionals views.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Robinson-Barella, Charlotte Lucy Richardson, Zana Bayley, Andy Husband, Andy Bojke, Rona Bojke, Catherine Exley, Barbara Hanratty, Joanna Elverson, Jesse Jansen, Adam Todd\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12904-024-01523-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deprescribing has been defined as the planned process of reducing or stopping medications that may no longer be beneficial or are causing harm, with the goal of reducing medication burden while improving patient quality of life. At present, little is known about the specific challenges of decision-making to support deprescribing for patients who are accessing palliative care. By exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals, this qualitative study aimed to address this gap, and explore the challenges of, and potential solutions to, making decisions about deprescribing in a palliative care context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals in-person or via video call, between August 2022 - January 2023. Perspectives on approaches to deprescribing in palliative care; when and how they might deprescribe; and the role of carers and family members within this process were discussed. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis enabled the development of themes. QSR NVivo (Version 12) facilitated data management. Ethical approval was obtained from the NHS Health Research Authority (ref 305394).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty healthcare professionals were interviewed, including: medical consultants, nurses, specialist pharmacists, and general practitioners (GPs). Participants described the importance of deprescribing decision-making, and that it should be a considered, proactive, and planned process. Three themes were developed from the data, which centred on: (1) professional attitudes, competency and responsibility towards deprescribing; (2) changing the culture of deprescribing; and (3) involving the patient and family/caregivers in deprescribing decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study sought to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals with responsibility for making deprescribing decisions with people accessing palliative care services. A range of healthcare professionals identified the importance of supporting decision-making in deprescribing, so it becomes a proactive process within a patient's care journey, rather than a reactive consequence. Future work should explore how healthcare professionals, patients and their family can be supported in the shared decision-making processes of deprescribing.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Ethical approval was obtained from the NHS Health Research Authority (ref 305394).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01523-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01523-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:去处方化被定义为有计划地减少或停用可能不再有益或造成伤害的药物的过程,其目标是在改善患者生活质量的同时减轻药物负担。目前,人们对支持姑息关怀患者减药决策的具体挑战知之甚少。本定性研究旨在通过探讨医护专业人员的观点来弥补这一不足,并探索在姑息关怀背景下做出减药决策所面临的挑战以及潜在的解决方案:在 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 1 月期间,对医护专业人员进行了面对面或视频通话的半结构化访谈。访谈内容包括姑息关怀中的处方开具方法、何时以及如何开具处方、照护者和家庭成员在此过程中的作用。对访谈进行了录音和逐字记录。通过反思性主题分析,形成了相关主题。QSR NVivo(第 12 版)为数据管理提供了便利。结果:对 20 名医疗保健专业人员进行了访谈,其中包括医疗顾问、护士、专科药剂师和全科医生(GP)。受访者阐述了去处方化决策的重要性,并认为这应该是一个深思熟虑、积极主动和有计划的过程。从数据中总结出三个主题,分别围绕:(1) 对去处方化的专业态度、能力和责任;(2) 改变去处方化的文化;(3) 让患者和家属/护理人员参与去处方化决策:本研究旨在探讨负责为接受姑息关怀服务的患者做出去处方化决定的医护专业人员的观点。一系列医护专业人员都认为,支持去处方化决策非常重要,这样才能使去处方化成为病人护理过程中的一个积极主动的过程,而不是一个被动的结果。未来的工作应探索如何在去势处方的共同决策过程中为医护人员、患者及其家属提供支持:试验注册:已获得英国国家医疗服务系统卫生研究局的伦理批准(编号 305394)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Starting to think that way from the start": approaching deprescribing decision-making for people accessing palliative care - a qualitative exploration of healthcare professionals views.

Background: Deprescribing has been defined as the planned process of reducing or stopping medications that may no longer be beneficial or are causing harm, with the goal of reducing medication burden while improving patient quality of life. At present, little is known about the specific challenges of decision-making to support deprescribing for patients who are accessing palliative care. By exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals, this qualitative study aimed to address this gap, and explore the challenges of, and potential solutions to, making decisions about deprescribing in a palliative care context.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals in-person or via video call, between August 2022 - January 2023. Perspectives on approaches to deprescribing in palliative care; when and how they might deprescribe; and the role of carers and family members within this process were discussed. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis enabled the development of themes. QSR NVivo (Version 12) facilitated data management. Ethical approval was obtained from the NHS Health Research Authority (ref 305394).

Results: Twenty healthcare professionals were interviewed, including: medical consultants, nurses, specialist pharmacists, and general practitioners (GPs). Participants described the importance of deprescribing decision-making, and that it should be a considered, proactive, and planned process. Three themes were developed from the data, which centred on: (1) professional attitudes, competency and responsibility towards deprescribing; (2) changing the culture of deprescribing; and (3) involving the patient and family/caregivers in deprescribing decision-making.

Conclusions: This study sought to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals with responsibility for making deprescribing decisions with people accessing palliative care services. A range of healthcare professionals identified the importance of supporting decision-making in deprescribing, so it becomes a proactive process within a patient's care journey, rather than a reactive consequence. Future work should explore how healthcare professionals, patients and their family can be supported in the shared decision-making processes of deprescribing.

Trial registration: Ethical approval was obtained from the NHS Health Research Authority (ref 305394).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
期刊最新文献
Advance care planning readiness among community-dwelling older adults and the influencing factors: a scoping review. Expected benefits and concerns regarding virtual reality in caring for terminally ill cancer patients - a qualitative interview study. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Sinhala version of the spiritual needs assessment for patients (S-SNAP) questionnaire. Perceived risk of death among patients with advanced cancer: a qualitative directed content analysis. Health care utilization at the end of life in Parkinson's disease: a population-based register study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1