Nesrin Gunduz , Mahmut Bilal Dogan , Huseyin Ozgur Kazan , Meftun Culpan , Asıf Yıldırım , Gulnur Erdem
{"title":"经验积累对膀胱癌 VI-RADS 诊断性能的影响。","authors":"Nesrin Gunduz , Mahmut Bilal Dogan , Huseyin Ozgur Kazan , Meftun Culpan , Asıf Yıldırım , Gulnur Erdem","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>MRI-based VI-RADS score aids in differentiating MIBC and NMIBC, but the experience's impact remains unexplored. We aimed to determine the effect of accumulating experience in the diagnostic performance of VI-RADS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In our previously published series 71 primary bladder cancer patients who underwent multiparametric MRI before the transurethral resection were analyzed. The radiologist who assessed the VI-RADS scores at the time the study was performed, re-evaluated all cases after 3 years, in a blinded fashion. During these three years, more than 300 additional bladder MRIs were performed for VI-RADS assessment. The diagnostic performances of the initial and subsequent VI-RADS analyses were compared. Moreover, VIRADS results obtained by a newly trained abdominal radiologist was also compared with experienced radiologist's results. For this study, VI-RADS ≥3 was accepted for predicting MIBC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall 71 patients [62 (87.3 %) males, 67.4 ± 10.2 years] who underwent bladder MRI before TURBT were included. Histopathology revealed MIBC in 16 (26.2 %) cases.</p><p>The initial MRI analysis revealed VI-RADS score ≥ 3 in 36 (50.7 %) cases. The sensitivity and specificity for depicting MIBC were 75 % and 56.4 % respectively. The subsequent MRI analysis revealed VI-RADS score ≥ 3 in 23 (32.4 %) cases. The sensitivity and specificity were 93.8 % and 85.5 % respectively. The MRI analysis performed by the recently trained abdominal radiologist revealed VI-RADS score ≥ 3 in 24 (33.8 %) cases. The sensitivity and specificity were 87.5 % and 56.4 % respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The diagnostic performance of VI-RADS for the interpretation of bladder MRI can improve over time by increasing the experience of the urogenital radiologist.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 110279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of accumulating experience on diagnostic performance of VI-RADS in bladder cancer\",\"authors\":\"Nesrin Gunduz , Mahmut Bilal Dogan , Huseyin Ozgur Kazan , Meftun Culpan , Asıf Yıldırım , Gulnur Erdem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>MRI-based VI-RADS score aids in differentiating MIBC and NMIBC, but the experience's impact remains unexplored. We aimed to determine the effect of accumulating experience in the diagnostic performance of VI-RADS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In our previously published series 71 primary bladder cancer patients who underwent multiparametric MRI before the transurethral resection were analyzed. The radiologist who assessed the VI-RADS scores at the time the study was performed, re-evaluated all cases after 3 years, in a blinded fashion. During these three years, more than 300 additional bladder MRIs were performed for VI-RADS assessment. The diagnostic performances of the initial and subsequent VI-RADS analyses were compared. Moreover, VIRADS results obtained by a newly trained abdominal radiologist was also compared with experienced radiologist's results. For this study, VI-RADS ≥3 was accepted for predicting MIBC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall 71 patients [62 (87.3 %) males, 67.4 ± 10.2 years] who underwent bladder MRI before TURBT were included. Histopathology revealed MIBC in 16 (26.2 %) cases.</p><p>The initial MRI analysis revealed VI-RADS score ≥ 3 in 36 (50.7 %) cases. The sensitivity and specificity for depicting MIBC were 75 % and 56.4 % respectively. The subsequent MRI analysis revealed VI-RADS score ≥ 3 in 23 (32.4 %) cases. The sensitivity and specificity were 93.8 % and 85.5 % respectively. The MRI analysis performed by the recently trained abdominal radiologist revealed VI-RADS score ≥ 3 in 24 (33.8 %) cases. The sensitivity and specificity were 87.5 % and 56.4 % respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The diagnostic performance of VI-RADS for the interpretation of bladder MRI can improve over time by increasing the experience of the urogenital radiologist.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002092\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of accumulating experience on diagnostic performance of VI-RADS in bladder cancer
Purpose
MRI-based VI-RADS score aids in differentiating MIBC and NMIBC, but the experience's impact remains unexplored. We aimed to determine the effect of accumulating experience in the diagnostic performance of VI-RADS.
Methods
In our previously published series 71 primary bladder cancer patients who underwent multiparametric MRI before the transurethral resection were analyzed. The radiologist who assessed the VI-RADS scores at the time the study was performed, re-evaluated all cases after 3 years, in a blinded fashion. During these three years, more than 300 additional bladder MRIs were performed for VI-RADS assessment. The diagnostic performances of the initial and subsequent VI-RADS analyses were compared. Moreover, VIRADS results obtained by a newly trained abdominal radiologist was also compared with experienced radiologist's results. For this study, VI-RADS ≥3 was accepted for predicting MIBC.
Results
Overall 71 patients [62 (87.3 %) males, 67.4 ± 10.2 years] who underwent bladder MRI before TURBT were included. Histopathology revealed MIBC in 16 (26.2 %) cases.
The initial MRI analysis revealed VI-RADS score ≥ 3 in 36 (50.7 %) cases. The sensitivity and specificity for depicting MIBC were 75 % and 56.4 % respectively. The subsequent MRI analysis revealed VI-RADS score ≥ 3 in 23 (32.4 %) cases. The sensitivity and specificity were 93.8 % and 85.5 % respectively. The MRI analysis performed by the recently trained abdominal radiologist revealed VI-RADS score ≥ 3 in 24 (33.8 %) cases. The sensitivity and specificity were 87.5 % and 56.4 % respectively.
Conclusion
The diagnostic performance of VI-RADS for the interpretation of bladder MRI can improve over time by increasing the experience of the urogenital radiologist.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology