利用荷兰全科医生的电子健康记录,从合理处方的绩效付费计划中吸取经验教训。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105148
I.G. Arslan , R.A. Verheij , K. Hek , L. Ramerman
{"title":"利用荷兰全科医生的电子健康记录,从合理处方的绩效付费计划中吸取经验教训。","authors":"I.G. Arslan ,&nbsp;R.A. Verheij ,&nbsp;K. Hek ,&nbsp;L. Ramerman","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A nationwide pay-for-performance (P4P) scheme was introduced in the Netherlands between 2018 and 2023 to incentivize appropriate prescribing in general practice. Appropriate prescribing was operationalised as adherence to prescription formularies and measured based on electronic health records (EHR) data. We evaluated this P4P scheme from a learning health systems perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 participants representing stakeholders of the scheme: general practitioners (GPs), health insurers, pharmacists, EHR suppliers and formulary committees. We used a thematic approach for data analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Using EHR data showed several benefits, but lack of uniformity of EHR systems hindered consistent measurements. Specific indicators were favoured over general indicators as they allow GPs to have more control over their performance. Most participants emphasized the need for GPs to jointly reflect on their performance. Communication to GPs appeared to be challenging. Partly because of these challenges, impact of the scheme on prescribing behaviour was perceived as limited. However, several unexpected positive effects of the scheme were mentioned, such as better EHR recording habits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study identified benefits and challenges useful for future P4P schemes in promoting appropriate care with EHR data. Enhancing uniformity in EHR systems is crucial for more consistent quality measurements. Future P4P schemes should focus on high-quality feedback, peer-to-peer learning and establish a single point of communication for healthcare providers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 105148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001581/pdfft?md5=cb96c594da473ea1abd228b99f5e42b1&pid=1-s2.0-S0168851024001581-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons learned from a pay-for-performance scheme for appropriate prescribing using electronic health records from general practices in the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"I.G. Arslan ,&nbsp;R.A. Verheij ,&nbsp;K. Hek ,&nbsp;L. Ramerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A nationwide pay-for-performance (P4P) scheme was introduced in the Netherlands between 2018 and 2023 to incentivize appropriate prescribing in general practice. Appropriate prescribing was operationalised as adherence to prescription formularies and measured based on electronic health records (EHR) data. We evaluated this P4P scheme from a learning health systems perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 participants representing stakeholders of the scheme: general practitioners (GPs), health insurers, pharmacists, EHR suppliers and formulary committees. We used a thematic approach for data analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Using EHR data showed several benefits, but lack of uniformity of EHR systems hindered consistent measurements. Specific indicators were favoured over general indicators as they allow GPs to have more control over their performance. Most participants emphasized the need for GPs to jointly reflect on their performance. Communication to GPs appeared to be challenging. Partly because of these challenges, impact of the scheme on prescribing behaviour was perceived as limited. However, several unexpected positive effects of the scheme were mentioned, such as better EHR recording habits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study identified benefits and challenges useful for future P4P schemes in promoting appropriate care with EHR data. Enhancing uniformity in EHR systems is crucial for more consistent quality measurements. Future P4P schemes should focus on high-quality feedback, peer-to-peer learning and establish a single point of communication for healthcare providers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"149 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001581/pdfft?md5=cb96c594da473ea1abd228b99f5e42b1&pid=1-s2.0-S0168851024001581-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001581\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介荷兰于 2018 年至 2023 年期间在全国范围内推行绩效薪酬(P4P)计划,以激励全科医生开具适当处方。根据电子健康记录(EHR)数据,适当处方被定义为对处方目录的遵守情况,并对其进行衡量。我们从学习型医疗系统的角度对这一 P4P 计划进行了评估:我们对 15 名代表该计划利益相关者的参与者进行了半结构化访谈,这些利益相关者包括全科医生 (GP)、医疗保险公司、药剂师、电子病历供应商和处方委员会。我们采用了专题方法进行数据分析:结果:使用电子病历数据显示了多种益处,但电子病历系统的不统一妨碍了测量的一致性。具体指标比一般指标更受青睐,因为它们能让全科医生更好地控制自己的绩效。大多数与会者强调,全科医生需要共同反思自己的绩效。与全科医生沟通似乎具有挑战性。部分由于这些挑战,人们认为该计划对处方行为的影响有限。然而,该计划也带来了一些意想不到的积极影响,例如更好的电子病历记录习惯:这项研究发现了一些益处和挑战,有助于未来的采购换进展计划利用电子病历数据促进适当的护理。加强电子病历系统的统一性对于更一致的质量测量至关重要。未来的 P4P 计划应注重高质量的反馈、同行间的学习,并为医疗服务提供者建立一个单一的沟通点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lessons learned from a pay-for-performance scheme for appropriate prescribing using electronic health records from general practices in the Netherlands

Introduction

A nationwide pay-for-performance (P4P) scheme was introduced in the Netherlands between 2018 and 2023 to incentivize appropriate prescribing in general practice. Appropriate prescribing was operationalised as adherence to prescription formularies and measured based on electronic health records (EHR) data. We evaluated this P4P scheme from a learning health systems perspective.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 participants representing stakeholders of the scheme: general practitioners (GPs), health insurers, pharmacists, EHR suppliers and formulary committees. We used a thematic approach for data analysis.

Results

Using EHR data showed several benefits, but lack of uniformity of EHR systems hindered consistent measurements. Specific indicators were favoured over general indicators as they allow GPs to have more control over their performance. Most participants emphasized the need for GPs to jointly reflect on their performance. Communication to GPs appeared to be challenging. Partly because of these challenges, impact of the scheme on prescribing behaviour was perceived as limited. However, several unexpected positive effects of the scheme were mentioned, such as better EHR recording habits.

Conclusions

This study identified benefits and challenges useful for future P4P schemes in promoting appropriate care with EHR data. Enhancing uniformity in EHR systems is crucial for more consistent quality measurements. Future P4P schemes should focus on high-quality feedback, peer-to-peer learning and establish a single point of communication for healthcare providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
期刊最新文献
How COVID-19 illness perceptions and individual shocks are associated with trust during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, France, Germany, and South Africa. Implementing integrated care infrastructure: A longitudinal study on the interplay of policies, interorganizational arrangements and interoperability in NHS England. Public contributions to R&D of medical innovations: A framework for analysis. What mechanisms lead to the endurance of health and social care integration? A multiple case study in Italy. The right to health for socioeconomically disadvantaged TB patients in South Korea: An AAAQ framework analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1