癌症临终患者的丧志综合征:定性研究。

Andrea Bovero, Alessandra Loreta Cito, Rossana Botto, Alexa Pidinchedda, Veronica Olivetti, Marcello Tucci, Giuliano Carlo Geminiani
{"title":"癌症临终患者的丧志综合征:定性研究。","authors":"Andrea Bovero, Alessandra Loreta Cito, Rossana Botto, Alexa Pidinchedda, Veronica Olivetti, Marcello Tucci, Giuliano Carlo Geminiani","doi":"10.1177/10499091241274315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In our previous study we analyzed the prevalence of demoralization in a sample of 235 end-of-life cancer patients using the Demoralization Scale (DS). The findings revealed that 50.2% of the participants reported experiencing a moderate level of demoralization. The main sub-dimensions observed from the original DS were Helplessness, Disheartenment, and Sense of Failure, which we have categorized as \"Emotional Distress and Inability to Cope\". The aim of this study was to qualitatively investigate the subjective experience of this factor among a group of terminal cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A sample of 30 patients was interviewed using seven open-ended questions, divided into 3 categories: helplessness, disheartenment and sense of failure. Content analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Faith and prayer, social support and preserving autonomy were the principal coping strategies used by the sample and have been classed as sources of hope. Sadness, anger, death anxiety, fear, and sickness were the most commonly expressed emotions. Faith, social support, autonomy, and fighting spirit were identified as the primary coping strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study allowed a better understanding of the patient's subjective experience of the demoralization sub-dimension. The deepening of the topic can increase personalized clinical interventions, according to the patient's needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demoralization Syndrome in End-Of-Life Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Bovero, Alessandra Loreta Cito, Rossana Botto, Alexa Pidinchedda, Veronica Olivetti, Marcello Tucci, Giuliano Carlo Geminiani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091241274315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In our previous study we analyzed the prevalence of demoralization in a sample of 235 end-of-life cancer patients using the Demoralization Scale (DS). The findings revealed that 50.2% of the participants reported experiencing a moderate level of demoralization. The main sub-dimensions observed from the original DS were Helplessness, Disheartenment, and Sense of Failure, which we have categorized as \\\"Emotional Distress and Inability to Cope\\\". The aim of this study was to qualitatively investigate the subjective experience of this factor among a group of terminal cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A sample of 30 patients was interviewed using seven open-ended questions, divided into 3 categories: helplessness, disheartenment and sense of failure. Content analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Faith and prayer, social support and preserving autonomy were the principal coping strategies used by the sample and have been classed as sources of hope. Sadness, anger, death anxiety, fear, and sickness were the most commonly expressed emotions. Faith, social support, autonomy, and fighting spirit were identified as the primary coping strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study allowed a better understanding of the patient's subjective experience of the demoralization sub-dimension. The deepening of the topic can increase personalized clinical interventions, according to the patient's needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241274315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241274315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的在之前的研究中,我们使用士气低落量表(DS)分析了 235 名临终癌症患者的士气低落情况。研究结果表明,50.2% 的参与者表示曾经历过中等程度的意志消沉。从最初的丧气量表中观察到的主要子维度是无助感、灰心丧气和失败感,我们将其归类为 "情绪困扰和无力应对"。本研究的目的是定性调查一组晚期癌症患者对这一因素的主观体验:方法:使用 7 个开放式问题对 30 名患者进行了抽样调查,问题分为 3 类:无助感、沮丧感和失败感。对结果进行了内容分析:结果:信仰和祈祷、社会支持和保持自主权是样本患者使用的主要应对策略,并被归类为希望之源。悲伤、愤怒、死亡焦虑、恐惧和疾病是最常表达的情绪。信仰、社会支持、自主和斗志被认为是主要的应对策略:本研究有助于更好地了解患者在意志消沉子维度上的主观体验。对这一主题的深入研究可以根据患者的需求,增加个性化的临床干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Demoralization Syndrome in End-Of-Life Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Objectives: In our previous study we analyzed the prevalence of demoralization in a sample of 235 end-of-life cancer patients using the Demoralization Scale (DS). The findings revealed that 50.2% of the participants reported experiencing a moderate level of demoralization. The main sub-dimensions observed from the original DS were Helplessness, Disheartenment, and Sense of Failure, which we have categorized as "Emotional Distress and Inability to Cope". The aim of this study was to qualitatively investigate the subjective experience of this factor among a group of terminal cancer patients.

Method: A sample of 30 patients was interviewed using seven open-ended questions, divided into 3 categories: helplessness, disheartenment and sense of failure. Content analysis was performed.

Results: Faith and prayer, social support and preserving autonomy were the principal coping strategies used by the sample and have been classed as sources of hope. Sadness, anger, death anxiety, fear, and sickness were the most commonly expressed emotions. Faith, social support, autonomy, and fighting spirit were identified as the primary coping strategies.

Conclusions: This study allowed a better understanding of the patient's subjective experience of the demoralization sub-dimension. The deepening of the topic can increase personalized clinical interventions, according to the patient's needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symptoms and Prognoses of Patients With Breast Cancer and Malignant Wounds in Palliative Care Units: The Multicenter, Prospective, Observational EASED Study. Development and Validation of the Home Hospice Care Needs Questionnaire for the Dying Old Adult (HHCNQ-DE) in Mainland China. Long-Term Impact of the End-of-Life Care Nursing Education Consortium on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice (KAP) of Indian Nurses Working in Non-Palliative Care Settings: A KAP-GAP Analysis. The Perspective of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care on Unmet Needs: A Qualitative Synthesis Using Meta-Ethnography. Caring for Patients Requiring Venous Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Can Upstream Palliative Care Make a Difference?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1