使用 10 毫米厚的 SE(B) 和 SE(T) 试样进行低约束断裂韧性测试,以确定主曲线参考温度

IF 4.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS Engineering Fracture Mechanics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110434
{"title":"使用 10 毫米厚的 SE(B) 和 SE(T) 试样进行低约束断裂韧性测试,以确定主曲线参考温度","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The constraint correction methodology for defect assessment is not widely applied in fitness-for-service codes in the nuclear industry and there are a limited number of testing standards to account for low-constraint testing. In this work, fracture toughness testing was performed with two different types of alloy steels. SE(B), C(T), and SE(T) specimen configurations were used, along with varying <em>a/W</em> ratios and specimen sizes, allowing for varying levels of constraint. New quality assurance measures related to selection of testing temperature, crack front straightness, and compliance for low constraint specimens are suggested. The results show that the SE(B) specimens are sensitive to CMOD measurement point location. Future work should be focused on improving and validating the instrumentation and analysis practices for low constraint specimens. Yet, the obtained SE(T) <em>T<sub>0</sub></em> values follow models predicting the effect of constraint loss developed using larger specimens. The work impacts the development of quality criteria for future low constraint testing standards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424005976/pdfft?md5=cc87293411a4656e5cfecd43d0221fd3&pid=1-s2.0-S0013794424005976-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low constraint fracture toughness testing for master curve reference temperature determination using 10 mm-thick SE(B) and SE(T) specimens\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The constraint correction methodology for defect assessment is not widely applied in fitness-for-service codes in the nuclear industry and there are a limited number of testing standards to account for low-constraint testing. In this work, fracture toughness testing was performed with two different types of alloy steels. SE(B), C(T), and SE(T) specimen configurations were used, along with varying <em>a/W</em> ratios and specimen sizes, allowing for varying levels of constraint. New quality assurance measures related to selection of testing temperature, crack front straightness, and compliance for low constraint specimens are suggested. The results show that the SE(B) specimens are sensitive to CMOD measurement point location. Future work should be focused on improving and validating the instrumentation and analysis practices for low constraint specimens. Yet, the obtained SE(T) <em>T<sub>0</sub></em> values follow models predicting the effect of constraint loss developed using larger specimens. The work impacts the development of quality criteria for future low constraint testing standards.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Fracture Mechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424005976/pdfft?md5=cc87293411a4656e5cfecd43d0221fd3&pid=1-s2.0-S0013794424005976-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Fracture Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424005976\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424005976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于缺陷评估的约束修正方法并未广泛应用于核工业的适役性规范中,而且用于低约束测试的测试标准数量有限。在这项工作中,对两种不同类型的合金钢进行了断裂韧性测试。使用了 SE(B)、C(T) 和 SE(T) 试样配置,以及不同的 a/W 比和试样尺寸,以实现不同程度的约束。提出了与选择测试温度、裂纹前沿直线度和低约束试样顺应性有关的新质量保证措施。结果表明,SE(B) 试样对 CMOD 测量点位置很敏感。今后的工作重点应放在改进和验证低约束试样的仪器和分析方法上。然而,所获得的 SE(T) T0 值符合使用较大试样开发的约束损失影响预测模型。这项工作有助于为未来的低约束测试标准制定质量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low constraint fracture toughness testing for master curve reference temperature determination using 10 mm-thick SE(B) and SE(T) specimens

The constraint correction methodology for defect assessment is not widely applied in fitness-for-service codes in the nuclear industry and there are a limited number of testing standards to account for low-constraint testing. In this work, fracture toughness testing was performed with two different types of alloy steels. SE(B), C(T), and SE(T) specimen configurations were used, along with varying a/W ratios and specimen sizes, allowing for varying levels of constraint. New quality assurance measures related to selection of testing temperature, crack front straightness, and compliance for low constraint specimens are suggested. The results show that the SE(B) specimens are sensitive to CMOD measurement point location. Future work should be focused on improving and validating the instrumentation and analysis practices for low constraint specimens. Yet, the obtained SE(T) T0 values follow models predicting the effect of constraint loss developed using larger specimens. The work impacts the development of quality criteria for future low constraint testing standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A novel experimental method for studying rock collision Crystal plasticity-driven evaluation of notch fatigue behavior in IN718 Research on the microstructure, mechanical and fatigue performance of 7075/6061 dissimilar aluminum alloy fusion welding joint treated by nanoparticle and post-weld heat treatment Strain-gradient and damage failure behavior in particle reinforced heterogeneous matrix composites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1