交叉路口中的行人互动对驾驶员三个层次情景意识的影响

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.023
Sami Park , Yilun Xing , Kumar Akash , Teruhisa Misu , Shashank Mehrotra , Linda Ng Boyle
{"title":"交叉路口中的行人互动对驾驶员三个层次情景意识的影响","authors":"Sami Park ,&nbsp;Yilun Xing ,&nbsp;Kumar Akash ,&nbsp;Teruhisa Misu ,&nbsp;Shashank Mehrotra ,&nbsp;Linda Ng Boyle","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evaluating drivers’ situation awareness (SA) is important in the implementation of alert prioritization. This study investigates the relationship between driving performance measures (speed, acceleration and brake usage, steering wheel and lane deviation), pedestrian interaction (location, direction and motion), and driver SA. To achieve this, a controlled study was conducted with 56 participants using a Balanced Incomplete Block Design, where each participant drove 18 out of 48 possible intersections in a driving simulator environment. The Situational Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) method was used to assess drivers’ SA. Mixed effects logit models were developed to examine the different SA Levels (perception, comprehension, projection). The driving performance measures were aggregated across three time windows (1, 3, and 5 s). The findings show significant contributions from both driving performance measures and pedestrian interactions in predicting driver SA. More specifically, a one-second time window was useful for predicting pedestrian direction and a three-second time window was best for predicting pedestrian location and intention to cross. The results indicate the importance of considering different time windows for predicting various levels of driver SA responses. These findings offer insights into factors to be considered in driver SA predictive models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 167-180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Pedestrian Interactions in Intersections on the Three Levels of Drivers’ Situation Awareness\",\"authors\":\"Sami Park ,&nbsp;Yilun Xing ,&nbsp;Kumar Akash ,&nbsp;Teruhisa Misu ,&nbsp;Shashank Mehrotra ,&nbsp;Linda Ng Boyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Evaluating drivers’ situation awareness (SA) is important in the implementation of alert prioritization. This study investigates the relationship between driving performance measures (speed, acceleration and brake usage, steering wheel and lane deviation), pedestrian interaction (location, direction and motion), and driver SA. To achieve this, a controlled study was conducted with 56 participants using a Balanced Incomplete Block Design, where each participant drove 18 out of 48 possible intersections in a driving simulator environment. The Situational Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) method was used to assess drivers’ SA. Mixed effects logit models were developed to examine the different SA Levels (perception, comprehension, projection). The driving performance measures were aggregated across three time windows (1, 3, and 5 s). The findings show significant contributions from both driving performance measures and pedestrian interactions in predicting driver SA. More specifically, a one-second time window was useful for predicting pedestrian direction and a three-second time window was best for predicting pedestrian location and intention to cross. The results indicate the importance of considering different time windows for predicting various levels of driver SA responses. These findings offer insights into factors to be considered in driver SA predictive models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 167-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002304\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估驾驶员的态势感知(SA)对于实施警报优先排序非常重要。本研究调查了驾驶性能指标(速度、加速和制动使用、方向盘和车道偏离)、行人互动(位置、方向和运动)与驾驶员态势感知之间的关系。为此,我们采用平衡不完全街区设计对 56 名参与者进行了对照研究,每位参与者在驾驶模拟器环境中驾驶了 48 个可能交叉路口中的 18 个。研究采用了态势感知全球评估技术(SAGAT)方法来评估驾驶员的态势感知能力。建立了混合效应 logit 模型,以检查不同的 SA 级别(感知、理解、预测)。驾驶性能指标在三个时间窗口(1、3 和 5 秒)内汇总。研究结果表明,驾驶性能指标和行人相互作用在预测驾驶员 SA 方面都有重要作用。更具体地说,1 秒钟的时间窗口有助于预测行人方向,而 3 秒钟的时间窗口最适合预测行人位置和过马路的意图。结果表明,考虑不同的时间窗对于预测不同程度的驾驶员 SA 反应非常重要。这些发现为驾驶员 SA 预测模型中需要考虑的因素提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Pedestrian Interactions in Intersections on the Three Levels of Drivers’ Situation Awareness

Evaluating drivers’ situation awareness (SA) is important in the implementation of alert prioritization. This study investigates the relationship between driving performance measures (speed, acceleration and brake usage, steering wheel and lane deviation), pedestrian interaction (location, direction and motion), and driver SA. To achieve this, a controlled study was conducted with 56 participants using a Balanced Incomplete Block Design, where each participant drove 18 out of 48 possible intersections in a driving simulator environment. The Situational Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) method was used to assess drivers’ SA. Mixed effects logit models were developed to examine the different SA Levels (perception, comprehension, projection). The driving performance measures were aggregated across three time windows (1, 3, and 5 s). The findings show significant contributions from both driving performance measures and pedestrian interactions in predicting driver SA. More specifically, a one-second time window was useful for predicting pedestrian direction and a three-second time window was best for predicting pedestrian location and intention to cross. The results indicate the importance of considering different time windows for predicting various levels of driver SA responses. These findings offer insights into factors to be considered in driver SA predictive models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Understanding car-sharing by integrating long-, medium- and short-term cognitions High-speed curve negotiation: Can differences in expertise account for the different effects of cognitive load? Description and analysis of aberrant riding behaviors of pedal cyclists, e-bike riders and motorcyclists: Based on a self-report questionnaire The role of emotional coherence in electric vehicle purchasing decisions Incorporating personality traits for the study of user acceptance of electric micromobility-sharing services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1