Márcia Lima , Igor Steinmacher , Denae Ford , Grace Vorreuter , Ludimila Gonçalves , Tayana Conte , Bruno Gadelha
{"title":"讨论是如何链接的?GitHub 讨论的链接分析研究","authors":"Márcia Lima , Igor Steinmacher , Denae Ford , Grace Vorreuter , Ludimila Gonçalves , Tayana Conte , Bruno Gadelha","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.112196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Software development requires collaborative efforts and consensus among developers, emphasizing the need for effective communication and knowledge sharing within the teams. In line with this, GitHub introduced GitHub Discussions, a collaborative communication feature for the community around an open-source or internal project. The user-friendly interface of Discussions facilitates easy sharing of links to different resources. Maintainers highlight this feature’s significance, enabling users to maintain a well-informed project environment. We hypothesize that link-sharing activities in Discussions contribute to disseminating project knowledge. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted a mixed-method study combining qualitative and quantitative analysis based on a convenience sample of ten open-source projects. We aimed to gain insight into the scope and intentions behind these shared links. Our findings indicate that link-sharing activities are common in the Discussions. Users share links to resources directly or indirectly related to the project/repository. Discussions users share links to project documentation, source code, and issues, aiming to clarify concepts, provide supplementary information, offer context to questions, and suggest new features. These findings offer insights for project maintainers to understand Discussions usage better and enable the GitHub Engineering team to promote the feature adoption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 112196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How are discussions linked? A link analysis study on GitHub Discussions\",\"authors\":\"Márcia Lima , Igor Steinmacher , Denae Ford , Grace Vorreuter , Ludimila Gonçalves , Tayana Conte , Bruno Gadelha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.112196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Software development requires collaborative efforts and consensus among developers, emphasizing the need for effective communication and knowledge sharing within the teams. In line with this, GitHub introduced GitHub Discussions, a collaborative communication feature for the community around an open-source or internal project. The user-friendly interface of Discussions facilitates easy sharing of links to different resources. Maintainers highlight this feature’s significance, enabling users to maintain a well-informed project environment. We hypothesize that link-sharing activities in Discussions contribute to disseminating project knowledge. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted a mixed-method study combining qualitative and quantitative analysis based on a convenience sample of ten open-source projects. We aimed to gain insight into the scope and intentions behind these shared links. Our findings indicate that link-sharing activities are common in the Discussions. Users share links to resources directly or indirectly related to the project/repository. Discussions users share links to project documentation, source code, and issues, aiming to clarify concepts, provide supplementary information, offer context to questions, and suggest new features. These findings offer insights for project maintainers to understand Discussions usage better and enable the GitHub Engineering team to promote the feature adoption.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121224002401\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121224002401","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
How are discussions linked? A link analysis study on GitHub Discussions
Software development requires collaborative efforts and consensus among developers, emphasizing the need for effective communication and knowledge sharing within the teams. In line with this, GitHub introduced GitHub Discussions, a collaborative communication feature for the community around an open-source or internal project. The user-friendly interface of Discussions facilitates easy sharing of links to different resources. Maintainers highlight this feature’s significance, enabling users to maintain a well-informed project environment. We hypothesize that link-sharing activities in Discussions contribute to disseminating project knowledge. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted a mixed-method study combining qualitative and quantitative analysis based on a convenience sample of ten open-source projects. We aimed to gain insight into the scope and intentions behind these shared links. Our findings indicate that link-sharing activities are common in the Discussions. Users share links to resources directly or indirectly related to the project/repository. Discussions users share links to project documentation, source code, and issues, aiming to clarify concepts, provide supplementary information, offer context to questions, and suggest new features. These findings offer insights for project maintainers to understand Discussions usage better and enable the GitHub Engineering team to promote the feature adoption.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
•Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution
•Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development
•Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems
•Human factors and management concerns of software development
•Data management and big data issues of software systems
•Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources
•Business and economic aspects of software development processes
The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.