根据 NRC-PSU 棒束传热 (RBHT) 试验设施对 TRACE 代码堆芯回流热液压现象进行基准测试

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113539
Grant R. Garrett , Douglas J. Miller , Turki Almudhhi , Fan-Bill Cheung , Brian R. Lowery , Molly K. Hanson , Stephen M. Bajorek , Kirk Tien , Chris L. Hoxie
{"title":"根据 NRC-PSU 棒束传热 (RBHT) 试验设施对 TRACE 代码堆芯回流热液压现象进行基准测试","authors":"Grant R. Garrett ,&nbsp;Douglas J. Miller ,&nbsp;Turki Almudhhi ,&nbsp;Fan-Bill Cheung ,&nbsp;Brian R. Lowery ,&nbsp;Molly K. Hanson ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Bajorek ,&nbsp;Kirk Tien ,&nbsp;Chris L. Hoxie","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper evaluates the performance of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) thermal hydraulic code TRAC/RELAP Advanced Computational Engine (TRACE) against experimental reflood data from the NRC/Pennsylvania State University (NRC/PSU) Rod Bundle Heat Transfer (RBHT) test facility, as an integral step in verification of code accuracy. This paper is an extension of the NURETH-20 conference paper by the first author (Garrett et al., 2023) that has been recommended for consideration and submission to Nuclear Engineering and Design. An international study on reflood thermal-hydraulics, sponsored by the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Working Group on Accident Management and Analysis (WGAMA), was conducted with data collected in the NRC/PSU RBHT test facility, located at the Pennsylvania State University. A series of 16 benchmark tests were conducted, with conditions covering a carefully selected range of oscillatory, variable stepped and constant rate reflood injection velocities. These unique conditions are useful for code validation and model improvement. These 16 tests were segmented into 11 open tests, followed by five blind tests. This paper covers the five blind tests as the 11 open tests were covered by Garrett et al. at the NURETH-19 conference (Garrett et al., 2021).</p><p>For TRACE code benchmarking, a numerical model with the same dimensions as the RBHT facility was used. The initial and boundary conditions for this model were taken from experimental measurements. Many of the test conditions were chosen to examine sensitivities to important parameters, such as reflood liquid subcooling, reflood rate, and system pressure. The wide range of test conditions served to test the code and provide insight to its strengths and potential areas of improvement. These novel experiments were vital in this effort.</p><p>Simulations were made for five reflood tests and comparisons between predicted and measured results were made for the transient cladding temperatures, vapor temperature, bundle liquid mass fraction, carryover fraction, and steam exhaust fraction. The comparison presented in this paper has provided useful insight into code improvements. Studies to more accurately model reflood phenomena are currently underway as a result of the work presented in this paper.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TRACE code core reflood thermal-hydraulics phenomena benchmarking against the NRC–PSU Rod Bundle Heat Transfer (RBHT) test facility\",\"authors\":\"Grant R. Garrett ,&nbsp;Douglas J. Miller ,&nbsp;Turki Almudhhi ,&nbsp;Fan-Bill Cheung ,&nbsp;Brian R. Lowery ,&nbsp;Molly K. Hanson ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Bajorek ,&nbsp;Kirk Tien ,&nbsp;Chris L. Hoxie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper evaluates the performance of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) thermal hydraulic code TRAC/RELAP Advanced Computational Engine (TRACE) against experimental reflood data from the NRC/Pennsylvania State University (NRC/PSU) Rod Bundle Heat Transfer (RBHT) test facility, as an integral step in verification of code accuracy. This paper is an extension of the NURETH-20 conference paper by the first author (Garrett et al., 2023) that has been recommended for consideration and submission to Nuclear Engineering and Design. An international study on reflood thermal-hydraulics, sponsored by the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Working Group on Accident Management and Analysis (WGAMA), was conducted with data collected in the NRC/PSU RBHT test facility, located at the Pennsylvania State University. A series of 16 benchmark tests were conducted, with conditions covering a carefully selected range of oscillatory, variable stepped and constant rate reflood injection velocities. These unique conditions are useful for code validation and model improvement. These 16 tests were segmented into 11 open tests, followed by five blind tests. This paper covers the five blind tests as the 11 open tests were covered by Garrett et al. at the NURETH-19 conference (Garrett et al., 2021).</p><p>For TRACE code benchmarking, a numerical model with the same dimensions as the RBHT facility was used. The initial and boundary conditions for this model were taken from experimental measurements. Many of the test conditions were chosen to examine sensitivities to important parameters, such as reflood liquid subcooling, reflood rate, and system pressure. The wide range of test conditions served to test the code and provide insight to its strengths and potential areas of improvement. These novel experiments were vital in this effort.</p><p>Simulations were made for five reflood tests and comparisons between predicted and measured results were made for the transient cladding temperatures, vapor temperature, bundle liquid mass fraction, carryover fraction, and steam exhaust fraction. The comparison presented in this paper has provided useful insight into code improvements. Studies to more accurately model reflood phenomena are currently underway as a result of the work presented in this paper.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549324006393\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549324006393","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评估了美国核管理委员会 (NRC) 的 TRAC/RELAP 高级计算引擎 (TRACE) 热液压代码与 NRC/宾夕法尼亚州立大学 (NRC/PSU) 棒束传热 (RBHT) 试验设施的实验回流数据的对比性能,作为验证代码准确性的一个不可或缺的步骤。本文是第一作者 NURETH-20 会议论文(Garrett 等人,2023 年)的延伸,该论文已被推荐给《核工程与设计》考虑和提交。由核能机构(NEA)事故管理与分析工作组(WGAMA)赞助的再充水热工水力学国际研究,利用位于宾夕法尼亚州立大学的 NRC/PSU RBHT 试验设施收集的数据进行。共进行了 16 次基准测试,测试条件涵盖了精心选择的振荡、可变阶跃和恒定速率再注水速度范围。这些独特的条件有助于验证代码和改进模型。这 16 次测试分为 11 次公开测试和 5 次盲测。本文介绍的是五次盲测,因为 Garrett 等人在 NURETH-19 会议上已经介绍了 11 次公开测试(Garrett 等人,2021 年)。为了进行 TRACE 代码基准测试,使用了与 RBHT 设施尺寸相同的数值模型。该模型的初始条件和边界条件取自实验测量结果。选择许多测试条件是为了检查重要参数的敏感性,如回流液体过冷度、回流速率和系统压力。广泛的测试条件有助于测试代码,并深入了解其优势和潜在的改进领域。对五次再充水试验进行了模拟,并对瞬态包层温度、蒸汽温度、管束液体质量分数、携带分数和蒸汽排出分数的预测结果和测量结果进行了比较。本文中的比较为改进代码提供了有益的启示。根据本文介绍的工作成果,目前正在研究如何更准确地模拟回流现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TRACE code core reflood thermal-hydraulics phenomena benchmarking against the NRC–PSU Rod Bundle Heat Transfer (RBHT) test facility

This paper evaluates the performance of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) thermal hydraulic code TRAC/RELAP Advanced Computational Engine (TRACE) against experimental reflood data from the NRC/Pennsylvania State University (NRC/PSU) Rod Bundle Heat Transfer (RBHT) test facility, as an integral step in verification of code accuracy. This paper is an extension of the NURETH-20 conference paper by the first author (Garrett et al., 2023) that has been recommended for consideration and submission to Nuclear Engineering and Design. An international study on reflood thermal-hydraulics, sponsored by the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Working Group on Accident Management and Analysis (WGAMA), was conducted with data collected in the NRC/PSU RBHT test facility, located at the Pennsylvania State University. A series of 16 benchmark tests were conducted, with conditions covering a carefully selected range of oscillatory, variable stepped and constant rate reflood injection velocities. These unique conditions are useful for code validation and model improvement. These 16 tests were segmented into 11 open tests, followed by five blind tests. This paper covers the five blind tests as the 11 open tests were covered by Garrett et al. at the NURETH-19 conference (Garrett et al., 2021).

For TRACE code benchmarking, a numerical model with the same dimensions as the RBHT facility was used. The initial and boundary conditions for this model were taken from experimental measurements. Many of the test conditions were chosen to examine sensitivities to important parameters, such as reflood liquid subcooling, reflood rate, and system pressure. The wide range of test conditions served to test the code and provide insight to its strengths and potential areas of improvement. These novel experiments were vital in this effort.

Simulations were made for five reflood tests and comparisons between predicted and measured results were made for the transient cladding temperatures, vapor temperature, bundle liquid mass fraction, carryover fraction, and steam exhaust fraction. The comparison presented in this paper has provided useful insight into code improvements. Studies to more accurately model reflood phenomena are currently underway as a result of the work presented in this paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Prevalence and predictors of hand hygiene compliance in clinical, surgical and intensive care unit wards: results of a second cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1