一项试点临床研究,评估将单个患者分类器用作 II-III 期胃癌患者预后检测的可行性。

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Chinese Journal of Cancer Research Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.04.02
Ji Yeong An, Sung Eun Oh, Soomin Ahn, Hyoung-Ii Kim, Yoo Min Kim, Minah Cho, Keun Won Ryu, Hong Man Yoon, Young Kyu Park, In Gyu Kwon, Sung Hoon Noh, Kyung Hee Lee, In Cho, Myoung Won Son, Jong Won Kim, Young-Woo Kim
{"title":"一项试点临床研究,评估将单个患者分类器用作 II-III 期胃癌患者预后检测的可行性。","authors":"Ji Yeong An, Sung Eun Oh, Soomin Ahn, Hyoung-Ii Kim, Yoo Min Kim, Minah Cho, Keun Won Ryu, Hong Man Yoon, Young Kyu Park, In Gyu Kwon, Sung Hoon Noh, Kyung Hee Lee, In Cho, Myoung Won Son, Jong Won Kim, Young-Woo Kim","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.04.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Precision medicine approaches emphasize the importance of reliable prognostic tools for guiding individualized therapy decisions. In this study, we evaluated the clinical feasibility of the single patient classifier (SPC) test, a new clinical-grade prognostic assay, in stage II-III gastric cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective multicenter study was conducted, involving 237 patients who underwent gastrectomy between September 2019 and August 2020 across nine hospitals. The SPC test was employed to stratify patients into risk groups, and its feasibility and performance were evaluated. The primary endpoint was the proportion of the cases in which the test results were timely delivered before selecting postoperative treatment. Furthermore, 3-year disease-free survivals of risk groups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SPC test met the primary endpoint criteria. The 99.5% of SPC tests were timely delivered to hospitals before the postoperative treatment started. In a clinical setting, the median time from the specimen transfer to laboratory to the result delivery to hospital was 4 d. Furthermore, 3-year disease-free survivals were significantly different between risk groups classified with SPC tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the SPC test's feasibility in offering crucial information timely delivered for making informed decisions regarding postoperative treatment strategies. It also provides evidence to support the implementation of a future prospective clinical trial aimed at evaluating the clinical utility of the SPC test in guiding personalized treatment decisions for gastric cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9882,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","volume":"36 4","pages":"368-377"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pilot clinical study to evaluate feasibility of using single patient classifier as a prognostic test in stage II<b>-</b>III gastric cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ji Yeong An, Sung Eun Oh, Soomin Ahn, Hyoung-Ii Kim, Yoo Min Kim, Minah Cho, Keun Won Ryu, Hong Man Yoon, Young Kyu Park, In Gyu Kwon, Sung Hoon Noh, Kyung Hee Lee, In Cho, Myoung Won Son, Jong Won Kim, Young-Woo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.04.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Precision medicine approaches emphasize the importance of reliable prognostic tools for guiding individualized therapy decisions. In this study, we evaluated the clinical feasibility of the single patient classifier (SPC) test, a new clinical-grade prognostic assay, in stage II-III gastric cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective multicenter study was conducted, involving 237 patients who underwent gastrectomy between September 2019 and August 2020 across nine hospitals. The SPC test was employed to stratify patients into risk groups, and its feasibility and performance were evaluated. The primary endpoint was the proportion of the cases in which the test results were timely delivered before selecting postoperative treatment. Furthermore, 3-year disease-free survivals of risk groups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SPC test met the primary endpoint criteria. The 99.5% of SPC tests were timely delivered to hospitals before the postoperative treatment started. In a clinical setting, the median time from the specimen transfer to laboratory to the result delivery to hospital was 4 d. Furthermore, 3-year disease-free survivals were significantly different between risk groups classified with SPC tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the SPC test's feasibility in offering crucial information timely delivered for making informed decisions regarding postoperative treatment strategies. It also provides evidence to support the implementation of a future prospective clinical trial aimed at evaluating the clinical utility of the SPC test in guiding personalized treatment decisions for gastric cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"368-377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.04.02\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.04.02","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:精准医疗方法强调可靠的预后工具对于指导个体化治疗决策的重要性。在这项研究中,我们评估了单个患者分类器(SPC)测试的临床可行性,这是一种新的临床级预后检测方法,适用于II-III期胃癌患者:开展了一项前瞻性多中心研究,涉及9家医院在2019年9月至2020年8月期间接受胃切除术的237名患者。采用 SPC 检验对患者进行风险分层,并评估其可行性和性能。主要终点是在选择术后治疗前及时得到检测结果的病例比例。此外,还对风险组的 3 年无病生存率进行了分析:结果:SPC检测符合主要终点标准。99.5%的 SPC 检测结果在术后治疗开始前及时送达医院。在临床环境中,从标本转移到实验室到结果送达医院的中位时间为4 d。此外,通过SPC检验划分的风险组别之间的3年无病生存率有显著差异:本研究强调了 SPC 检验的可行性,它能及时提供关键信息,以便就术后治疗策略做出明智的决定。该研究还为未来开展前瞻性临床试验提供了证据支持,该试验旨在评估 SPC 检验在指导胃癌患者个性化治疗决策方面的临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A pilot clinical study to evaluate feasibility of using single patient classifier as a prognostic test in stage II-III gastric cancer patients.

Objective: Precision medicine approaches emphasize the importance of reliable prognostic tools for guiding individualized therapy decisions. In this study, we evaluated the clinical feasibility of the single patient classifier (SPC) test, a new clinical-grade prognostic assay, in stage II-III gastric cancer patients.

Methods: A prospective multicenter study was conducted, involving 237 patients who underwent gastrectomy between September 2019 and August 2020 across nine hospitals. The SPC test was employed to stratify patients into risk groups, and its feasibility and performance were evaluated. The primary endpoint was the proportion of the cases in which the test results were timely delivered before selecting postoperative treatment. Furthermore, 3-year disease-free survivals of risk groups were analyzed.

Results: The SPC test met the primary endpoint criteria. The 99.5% of SPC tests were timely delivered to hospitals before the postoperative treatment started. In a clinical setting, the median time from the specimen transfer to laboratory to the result delivery to hospital was 4 d. Furthermore, 3-year disease-free survivals were significantly different between risk groups classified with SPC tests.

Conclusions: This study highlights the SPC test's feasibility in offering crucial information timely delivered for making informed decisions regarding postoperative treatment strategies. It also provides evidence to support the implementation of a future prospective clinical trial aimed at evaluating the clinical utility of the SPC test in guiding personalized treatment decisions for gastric cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
1726
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Cancer Research (CJCR; Print ISSN: 1000-9604; Online ISSN:1993-0631) is published by AME Publishing Company in association with Chinese Anti-Cancer Association.It was launched in March 1995 as a quarterly publication and is now published bi-monthly since February 2013. CJCR is published bi-monthly in English, and is an international journal devoted to the life sciences and medical sciences. It publishes peer-reviewed original articles of basic investigations and clinical observations, reviews and brief communications providing a forum for the recent experimental and clinical advances in cancer research. This journal is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), PubMed/PubMed Central (PMC), Scopus, SciSearch, Chemistry Abstracts (CA), the Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, Chinainfo, CNKI, CSCI, etc.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence efficiently predicts gastric lesions, Helicobacter pylori infection and lymph node metastasis upon endoscopic images. Deep learning-based automatic pipeline system for predicting lateral cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma using computed tomography: A multi-center study. Effect of visceral obesity on outcomes of fluorescence-guided lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Post hoc analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial. Epidemiology of biliary tract cancer in China: A narrative review. Non-small cell lung cancer organoids: Advances and challenges in current applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1