美国 FDA 批准摘要:贝祖替凡用于晚期肾细胞癌患者。

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Clinical Cancer Research Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1199
Jaleh Fallah, Brian L Heiss, Hee-Koung Joeng, Chana Weinstock, Xin Gao, William F Pierce, Benjamin Chukwurah, Vishal Bhatnagar, Mallorie H Fiero, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Richard Pazdur, Paul G Kluetz, Daniel L Suzman
{"title":"美国 FDA 批准摘要:贝祖替凡用于晚期肾细胞癌患者。","authors":"Jaleh Fallah, Brian L Heiss, Hee-Koung Joeng, Chana Weinstock, Xin Gao, William F Pierce, Benjamin Chukwurah, Vishal Bhatnagar, Mallorie H Fiero, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Richard Pazdur, Paul G Kluetz, Daniel L Suzman","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On December 14, 2023, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved belzutifan (Welireg, Merck & Co., Inc.) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following a programmed death receptor-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitor and a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF-TKI). FDA granted traditional approval based on LITESPARK-005 (NCT04195750), an open-label, randomized, head-to-head trial of 746 patients with advanced RCC that progressed following both a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF-TKI. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive belzutifan or everolimus. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). A statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated for belzutifan compared with everolimus [hazard ratio (HR)=0.75 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.90); 1-sided p-value=0.0008]. Kaplan-Meier curves reflected non-proportional hazards with similar median PFS estimates of 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.9, 7.0) in the belzutifan arm and 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.8, 5.8) in the everolimus arm. While not reaching full maturity, OS results appeared to show a favorable trend in the belzutifan arm compared to everolimus [HR=0.88 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.07)]. The confirmed objective response rate by BICR was 22% and 3.6% in belzutifan and everolimus arms, respectively. Observed toxicities differed between treatment arms, but drug discontinuations and interruptions due to treatment-emergent adverse events were lower on the belzutifan arm compared to the everolimus arm, and a descriptive analysis of patient-reported symptom and functional outcomes was suggestive of favorable tolerability for belzutifan compared to everolimus.</p>","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDA Approval Summary: Belzutifan for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Jaleh Fallah, Brian L Heiss, Hee-Koung Joeng, Chana Weinstock, Xin Gao, William F Pierce, Benjamin Chukwurah, Vishal Bhatnagar, Mallorie H Fiero, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Richard Pazdur, Paul G Kluetz, Daniel L Suzman\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>On December 14, 2023, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved belzutifan (Welireg, Merck & Co., Inc.) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following a programmed death receptor-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitor and a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF-TKI). FDA granted traditional approval based on LITESPARK-005 (NCT04195750), an open-label, randomized, head-to-head trial of 746 patients with advanced RCC that progressed following both a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF-TKI. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive belzutifan or everolimus. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). A statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated for belzutifan compared with everolimus [hazard ratio (HR)=0.75 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.90); 1-sided p-value=0.0008]. Kaplan-Meier curves reflected non-proportional hazards with similar median PFS estimates of 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.9, 7.0) in the belzutifan arm and 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.8, 5.8) in the everolimus arm. While not reaching full maturity, OS results appeared to show a favorable trend in the belzutifan arm compared to everolimus [HR=0.88 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.07)]. The confirmed objective response rate by BICR was 22% and 3.6% in belzutifan and everolimus arms, respectively. Observed toxicities differed between treatment arms, but drug discontinuations and interruptions due to treatment-emergent adverse events were lower on the belzutifan arm compared to the everolimus arm, and a descriptive analysis of patient-reported symptom and functional outcomes was suggestive of favorable tolerability for belzutifan compared to everolimus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1199\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1199","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023年12月14日,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准belzutifan(Welireg,默克公司)用于接受过程序性死亡受体-1或程序性死亡配体1(PD-1/PD-L1)抑制剂和血管内皮生长因子酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGF-TKI)治疗的晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者。FDA根据LITESPARK-005 (NCT04195750)授予了传统批准,LITESPARK-005是一项开放标签、随机、头对头试验,对746名同时使用PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂和VEGF-TKI后病情进展的晚期RCC患者进行了试验。患者随机(1:1)接受贝珠单抗或依维莫司治疗。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),由盲法独立中央审查(BICR)评估。与依维莫司相比,贝珠单抗的无进展生存期有明显的统计学改善[危险比 (HR)=0.75 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.90);单侧 p 值=0.0008]。Kaplan-Meier曲线反映了非比例危险,中位PFS估计值相似,贝珠替凡治疗组为5.6个月(95% CI:3.9,7.0),依维莫司治疗组为5.6个月(95% CI:4.8,5.8)。虽然尚未完全成熟,但与依维莫司相比,belzutifan治疗组的OS结果似乎显示出有利趋势[HR=0.88(95% CI:0.73,1.07)]。贝珠单抗和依维莫司治疗组的BICR证实客观反应率分别为22%和3.6%。治疗组之间观察到的毒性有所不同,但与依维莫司治疗组相比,贝珠替凡治疗组因治疗引起的不良事件而停药和中断治疗的比例较低,对患者报告的症状和功能结果进行的描述性分析表明,贝珠替凡的耐受性优于依维莫司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FDA Approval Summary: Belzutifan for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

On December 14, 2023, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved belzutifan (Welireg, Merck & Co., Inc.) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following a programmed death receptor-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitor and a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF-TKI). FDA granted traditional approval based on LITESPARK-005 (NCT04195750), an open-label, randomized, head-to-head trial of 746 patients with advanced RCC that progressed following both a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF-TKI. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive belzutifan or everolimus. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). A statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated for belzutifan compared with everolimus [hazard ratio (HR)=0.75 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.90); 1-sided p-value=0.0008]. Kaplan-Meier curves reflected non-proportional hazards with similar median PFS estimates of 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.9, 7.0) in the belzutifan arm and 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.8, 5.8) in the everolimus arm. While not reaching full maturity, OS results appeared to show a favorable trend in the belzutifan arm compared to everolimus [HR=0.88 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.07)]. The confirmed objective response rate by BICR was 22% and 3.6% in belzutifan and everolimus arms, respectively. Observed toxicities differed between treatment arms, but drug discontinuations and interruptions due to treatment-emergent adverse events were lower on the belzutifan arm compared to the everolimus arm, and a descriptive analysis of patient-reported symptom and functional outcomes was suggestive of favorable tolerability for belzutifan compared to everolimus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
期刊最新文献
AACR Cancer Progress Report 2024: Inspiring Science-Fueling Progress-Revolutionizing Care. Cancer in multi-lineage mosaic RASopathies due to pathogenic variants in HRAS or KRAS: a systematic review and meta-analysis A Phase I First-in-Human Study of ABBV-011, a Seizure-Related Homolog Protein 6-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer Clonal Hematopoiesis and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Given Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (Alliance A031201) Update on Whole-body MRI Surveillance for Pediatric Cancer Predisposition Syndromes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1