电子病历警报的实施显著提高了肺癌筛查率。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical lung cancer Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002
Ju Ae Park, Sriya Yalamanchili, Zeliene Brown, Andrew Myers, Michael J Weyant, Amit K Mahajan, Christopher Patrick Connolly, Kei Suzuki
{"title":"电子病历警报的实施显著提高了肺癌筛查率。","authors":"Ju Ae Park, Sriya Yalamanchili, Zeliene Brown, Andrew Myers, Michael J Weyant, Amit K Mahajan, Christopher Patrick Connolly, Kei Suzuki","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A query of current and former smokers identified 62,630 patients aged 50 and above in the primary care setting between January 1, 2021 and May 5, 2022. We randomly reviewed 3704 charts for LCS eligibility and recorded who received LCS in the form of low-dose computed tomography amongst the eligible patients. We collected demographic information including gender, race, primary language, ethnicity, zip code, and insurance. Data analysis was performed utilizing 2-proportional z tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 461 patients who were LCS eligible. Our overall LCS uptake was 19.9% (92/461). Three-time frames were analyzed: (1) prior to EMR alert implementation, (2) after implementation of EMR alert (January 7, 2021), and (3) after implementation of EMR alert and order set (March 3, 2021). Screening uptake was significantly improved with initiation of EMR alert (1/46 [2.2%] to 23/109 [21.1%]; P = .003). LCS uptake remained similarly high after subsequent order set implementation (23/109 [21.1%] and 68/306 [22.2%]; P = .72). Amongst the different demographics, age was significantly associated with screening uptake, with age ≥65 demonstrating statistically significant increased rates of screening (15.6% [41/263] for <65 vs 25.8% [51/198] for ≥65; P = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of EMR alerts significantly improves LCS uptake in the primary care setting. Such efforts should be considered in other hospital settings to improve LCS uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake.\",\"authors\":\"Ju Ae Park, Sriya Yalamanchili, Zeliene Brown, Andrew Myers, Michael J Weyant, Amit K Mahajan, Christopher Patrick Connolly, Kei Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A query of current and former smokers identified 62,630 patients aged 50 and above in the primary care setting between January 1, 2021 and May 5, 2022. We randomly reviewed 3704 charts for LCS eligibility and recorded who received LCS in the form of low-dose computed tomography amongst the eligible patients. We collected demographic information including gender, race, primary language, ethnicity, zip code, and insurance. Data analysis was performed utilizing 2-proportional z tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 461 patients who were LCS eligible. Our overall LCS uptake was 19.9% (92/461). Three-time frames were analyzed: (1) prior to EMR alert implementation, (2) after implementation of EMR alert (January 7, 2021), and (3) after implementation of EMR alert and order set (March 3, 2021). Screening uptake was significantly improved with initiation of EMR alert (1/46 [2.2%] to 23/109 [21.1%]; P = .003). LCS uptake remained similarly high after subsequent order set implementation (23/109 [21.1%] and 68/306 [22.2%]; P = .72). Amongst the different demographics, age was significantly associated with screening uptake, with age ≥65 demonstrating statistically significant increased rates of screening (15.6% [41/263] for <65 vs 25.8% [51/198] for ≥65; P = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of EMR alerts significantly improves LCS uptake in the primary care setting. Such efforts should be considered in other hospital settings to improve LCS uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言早期发现肺癌可大大提高存活率。然而,尽管国家提出了建议,但肺癌筛查(LCS)的接受率仍然很低。我们的目的是确定电子病历(EMR)警报和订单集的实施是否会提高肺癌筛查率:研究设计:2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 5 日期间,通过对目前和以前的吸烟者进行查询,确定了 62,630 名年龄在 50 岁及以上的初级保健患者。我们随机审查了 3704 份病历,以确定是否符合接受 LCS 的条件,并记录了符合条件的患者中哪些人接受了低剂量计算机断层扫描形式的 LCS。我们收集了人口统计学信息,包括性别、种族、主要语言、民族、邮编和保险。数据分析采用 2 比例 z 检验:我们确定了 461 名符合 LCS 条件的患者。我们的总体 LCS 使用率为 19.9%(92/461)。我们对三个时间框架进行了分析:(1) EMR 警报实施前;(2) EMR 警报实施后(2021 年 1 月 7 日);(3) EMR 警报和订单集实施后(2021 年 3 月 3 日)。随着 EMR 警报的启动,筛查接受率明显提高(从 1/46 [2.2%] 到 23/109 [21.1%];P = .003)。在随后的订单集实施后,LCS 使用率同样保持较高水平(23/109 [21.1%] 和 68/306 [22.2%];P = .72)。在不同的人口统计学特征中,年龄与筛查率显著相关,年龄≥65 岁的筛查率有统计学意义的显著增加(15.6% [41/263] ,年龄≥65 岁的筛查率有统计学意义的显著增加(15.6% [41/263] ,年龄≥65 岁的筛查率有统计学意义的显著增加):在基层医疗机构实施电子病历警报可明显提高 LCS 的接受率。在其他医院环境中也应考虑开展此类工作,以提高 LCS 使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake.

Introduction: Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake.

Study design: A query of current and former smokers identified 62,630 patients aged 50 and above in the primary care setting between January 1, 2021 and May 5, 2022. We randomly reviewed 3704 charts for LCS eligibility and recorded who received LCS in the form of low-dose computed tomography amongst the eligible patients. We collected demographic information including gender, race, primary language, ethnicity, zip code, and insurance. Data analysis was performed utilizing 2-proportional z tests.

Results: We identified 461 patients who were LCS eligible. Our overall LCS uptake was 19.9% (92/461). Three-time frames were analyzed: (1) prior to EMR alert implementation, (2) after implementation of EMR alert (January 7, 2021), and (3) after implementation of EMR alert and order set (March 3, 2021). Screening uptake was significantly improved with initiation of EMR alert (1/46 [2.2%] to 23/109 [21.1%]; P = .003). LCS uptake remained similarly high after subsequent order set implementation (23/109 [21.1%] and 68/306 [22.2%]; P = .72). Amongst the different demographics, age was significantly associated with screening uptake, with age ≥65 demonstrating statistically significant increased rates of screening (15.6% [41/263] for <65 vs 25.8% [51/198] for ≥65; P = .007).

Conclusion: Implementation of EMR alerts significantly improves LCS uptake in the primary care setting. Such efforts should be considered in other hospital settings to improve LCS uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
A Phase I Open-Label Study of Cediranib Plus Etoposide and Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Identification and Treatment of Lung Cancer Oncogenic Drivers in a Diverse Safety Net Setting Understanding the Social Risk Factors That Avert Equitable Lung Cancer Care Response to Editor: Commentary on “Influence of Tumor Cavitation on Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Anti-PD1 or PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma” Letter to the Editor in Response to “Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening in a Centralized Academic Program”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1