关于 COVID-19 第一波期间降钙素原检测对住院患者抗生素使用影响的倾向分数匹配队列回顾性研究。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1093/jac/dkae246
Jonathan A T Sandoe, Detelina Grozeva, Mahableshwar Albur, Stuart E Bond, Lucy Brookes-Howell, Paul Dark, Joanne Euden, Ryan Hamilton, Thomas P Hellyer, Josie Henley, Susan Hopkins, Philip Howard, Daniel Howdon, Chikezie Knox-Macaulay, Martin J Llewelyn, Wakunyambo Maboshe, Iain J McCullagh, Margaret Ogden, Helena K Parsons, David G Partridge, Neil Powell, Graham Prestwich, Dominick Shaw, Bethany Shinkins, Tamas Szakmany, Emma Thomas-Jones, Stacy Todd, Robert M West, Enitan D Carrol, Philip Pallmann
{"title":"关于 COVID-19 第一波期间降钙素原检测对住院患者抗生素使用影响的倾向分数匹配队列回顾性研究。","authors":"Jonathan A T Sandoe, Detelina Grozeva, Mahableshwar Albur, Stuart E Bond, Lucy Brookes-Howell, Paul Dark, Joanne Euden, Ryan Hamilton, Thomas P Hellyer, Josie Henley, Susan Hopkins, Philip Howard, Daniel Howdon, Chikezie Knox-Macaulay, Martin J Llewelyn, Wakunyambo Maboshe, Iain J McCullagh, Margaret Ogden, Helena K Parsons, David G Partridge, Neil Powell, Graham Prestwich, Dominick Shaw, Bethany Shinkins, Tamas Szakmany, Emma Thomas-Jones, Stacy Todd, Robert M West, Enitan D Carrol, Philip Pallmann","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkae246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Procalcitonin (PCT) is a blood marker used to help diagnose bacterial infections and guide antibiotic treatment. PCT testing was widely used/adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary: to measure the difference in length of early (during first 7 days) antibiotic prescribing between patients with COVID-19 who did/did not have baseline PCT testing during the first wave of the pandemic. Secondary: to measure differences in length of hospital/ICU stay, mortality, total days of antibiotic prescribing and resistant bacterial infections between these groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-centre, retrospective, observational, cohort study using patient-level clinical data from acute hospital Trusts/Health Boards in England/Wales. Inclusion: patients ≥16 years, admitted to participating Trusts/Health Boards and with a confirmed positive COVID-19 test between 1 February 2020 and 30 June 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 5960 patients were analysed: 1548 (26.0%) had a baseline PCT test and 4412 (74.0%) did not. Using propensity-score matching, baseline PCT testing was associated with an average reduction in early antibiotic prescribing of 0.43 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.64 days, P < 0.001) and of 0.72 days (95% CI: 0.06-1.38 days, P = 0.03] in total antibiotic prescribing. Baseline PCT testing was not associated with increased mortality or hospital/ICU length of stay or with the rate of antimicrobial-resistant secondary bacterial infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baseline PCT testing appears to have been an effective antimicrobial stewardship tool early in the pandemic: it reduced antibiotic prescribing without evidence of harm. Our study highlights the need for embedded, rapid evaluations of infection diagnostics in the National Health Service so that even in challenging circumstances, introduction into clinical practice is supported by evidence for clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Study registration number: </strong>ISRCTN66682918.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective propensity-score-matched cohort study of the impact of procalcitonin testing on antibiotic use in hospitalized patients during the first wave of COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan A T Sandoe, Detelina Grozeva, Mahableshwar Albur, Stuart E Bond, Lucy Brookes-Howell, Paul Dark, Joanne Euden, Ryan Hamilton, Thomas P Hellyer, Josie Henley, Susan Hopkins, Philip Howard, Daniel Howdon, Chikezie Knox-Macaulay, Martin J Llewelyn, Wakunyambo Maboshe, Iain J McCullagh, Margaret Ogden, Helena K Parsons, David G Partridge, Neil Powell, Graham Prestwich, Dominick Shaw, Bethany Shinkins, Tamas Szakmany, Emma Thomas-Jones, Stacy Todd, Robert M West, Enitan D Carrol, Philip Pallmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkae246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Procalcitonin (PCT) is a blood marker used to help diagnose bacterial infections and guide antibiotic treatment. PCT testing was widely used/adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary: to measure the difference in length of early (during first 7 days) antibiotic prescribing between patients with COVID-19 who did/did not have baseline PCT testing during the first wave of the pandemic. Secondary: to measure differences in length of hospital/ICU stay, mortality, total days of antibiotic prescribing and resistant bacterial infections between these groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-centre, retrospective, observational, cohort study using patient-level clinical data from acute hospital Trusts/Health Boards in England/Wales. Inclusion: patients ≥16 years, admitted to participating Trusts/Health Boards and with a confirmed positive COVID-19 test between 1 February 2020 and 30 June 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 5960 patients were analysed: 1548 (26.0%) had a baseline PCT test and 4412 (74.0%) did not. Using propensity-score matching, baseline PCT testing was associated with an average reduction in early antibiotic prescribing of 0.43 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.64 days, P < 0.001) and of 0.72 days (95% CI: 0.06-1.38 days, P = 0.03] in total antibiotic prescribing. Baseline PCT testing was not associated with increased mortality or hospital/ICU length of stay or with the rate of antimicrobial-resistant secondary bacterial infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baseline PCT testing appears to have been an effective antimicrobial stewardship tool early in the pandemic: it reduced antibiotic prescribing without evidence of harm. Our study highlights the need for embedded, rapid evaluations of infection diagnostics in the National Health Service so that even in challenging circumstances, introduction into clinical practice is supported by evidence for clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Study registration number: </strong>ISRCTN66682918.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae246\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:降钙素原(PCT)是一种血液标记物,用于帮助诊断细菌感染和指导抗生素治疗。在英国 COVID-19 大流行期间,PCT 检测被广泛使用/采纳:主要目的:测量在第一波大流行期间进行/未进行基线 PCT 检测的 COVID-19 患者的早期(前 7 天)抗生素处方时间差异。次要目的:测量这两组患者的住院时间/重症监护室停留时间、死亡率、抗生素处方总天数和耐药菌感染的差异:多中心、回顾性、观察性、队列研究,使用英格兰/威尔士急症医院信托基金/卫生局提供的患者临床数据。纳入对象:2020 年 2 月 1 日至 2020 年 6 月 30 日期间,在参与研究的托管医院/卫生局住院且 COVID-19 检测呈阳性的≥16 岁患者:对5960名患者的数据进行了分析:1548人(26.0%)进行了基线PCT检测,4412人(74.0%)未进行检测。通过倾向分数匹配,基线 PCT 检测与早期抗生素处方平均减少 0.43 天相关[95% 置信区间 (CI):0.22-0.64 天,P 结论:基线 PCT 检测似乎与早期抗生素处方平均减少 0.43 天相关:在大流行早期,基线 PCT 检测似乎是一种有效的抗菌药物管理工具:它减少了抗生素处方的开具,但没有证据表明会造成伤害。我们的研究强调了在国民健康服务中对感染诊断进行嵌入式快速评估的必要性,这样即使在具有挑战性的情况下,将其引入临床实践也能得到临床实用性证据的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A retrospective propensity-score-matched cohort study of the impact of procalcitonin testing on antibiotic use in hospitalized patients during the first wave of COVID-19.

Background: Procalcitonin (PCT) is a blood marker used to help diagnose bacterial infections and guide antibiotic treatment. PCT testing was widely used/adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.

Objectives: Primary: to measure the difference in length of early (during first 7 days) antibiotic prescribing between patients with COVID-19 who did/did not have baseline PCT testing during the first wave of the pandemic. Secondary: to measure differences in length of hospital/ICU stay, mortality, total days of antibiotic prescribing and resistant bacterial infections between these groups.

Methods: Multi-centre, retrospective, observational, cohort study using patient-level clinical data from acute hospital Trusts/Health Boards in England/Wales. Inclusion: patients ≥16 years, admitted to participating Trusts/Health Boards and with a confirmed positive COVID-19 test between 1 February 2020 and 30 June 2020.

Results: Data from 5960 patients were analysed: 1548 (26.0%) had a baseline PCT test and 4412 (74.0%) did not. Using propensity-score matching, baseline PCT testing was associated with an average reduction in early antibiotic prescribing of 0.43 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.64 days, P < 0.001) and of 0.72 days (95% CI: 0.06-1.38 days, P = 0.03] in total antibiotic prescribing. Baseline PCT testing was not associated with increased mortality or hospital/ICU length of stay or with the rate of antimicrobial-resistant secondary bacterial infections.

Conclusions: Baseline PCT testing appears to have been an effective antimicrobial stewardship tool early in the pandemic: it reduced antibiotic prescribing without evidence of harm. Our study highlights the need for embedded, rapid evaluations of infection diagnostics in the National Health Service so that even in challenging circumstances, introduction into clinical practice is supported by evidence for clinical utility.

Study registration number: ISRCTN66682918.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
期刊最新文献
Use of echinocandin outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infection caused by Candida spp.: utilization, outcomes and impact of a change to weekly dosing Comparative evaluation of early treatment with ceftolozane/tazobactam versus ceftazidime/avibactam for non-COVID-19 patients with pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Restoring vancomycin activity against resistant Enterococcus faecalis using a transcription factor decoy as a vanA operon-inhibitor. Clinically important interactions of macrolides and tetracyclines with dietary interventions—a systematic review with meta-analyses Population pharmacokinetics of unbound cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent high-flux haemodialysis: can a three-times-weekly post-dialysis dosing regimen provide optimal treatment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1