Yana A Wilson, Natasha Garrity, Hayley Smithers-Sheedy, Shona Goldsmith, Tasneem Karim, Georgina Henry, Simon Paget, Maria Kyriagis, Nadia Badawi, Gareth Baynam, Jozef Gecz, Sarah McIntyre
{"title":"根据临床描述和表型评估在脑瘫队列中发现的临床相关基因:系统综述。","authors":"Yana A Wilson, Natasha Garrity, Hayley Smithers-Sheedy, Shona Goldsmith, Tasneem Karim, Georgina Henry, Simon Paget, Maria Kyriagis, Nadia Badawi, Gareth Baynam, Jozef Gecz, Sarah McIntyre","doi":"10.1177/08830738241277231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing number of genes have been identified in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP); however, many of these studies have poor compliance with the cerebral palsy clinical description. This systematic review aimed to assess the quality of the cerebral palsy clinical description/phenotype in cerebral palsy genetic studies published between 2010 and 2024 and report clinically relevant genes based on the quality of the cerebral palsy phenotype. An expert panel developed 6 criteria to review the reported cerebral palsy phenotype/description for each included study. Clinically relevant genes were extracted from each study and stratified into 2 tiers based on the quality. Eighteen studies were included. There was high confidence in the reported cerebral palsy description/phenotype from 8 studies. Of the initial 373 clinically relevant genes, 85 were tier II genes. Individual cerebral palsy motor disorder and phenotype data were absent for 349 of these individuals, limiting further analysis. The tier I gene list was composed of 6 genes: <i>ATL1</i>, <i>COL4A1</i>, <i>GNAO1</i>, <i>KIF1A</i>, <i>SPAST</i>, and <i>TUBA1A</i>. Bilateral spasticity was the most common motor disorder reported in individuals with variants in all 6 genes, and most individuals had accompanying conditions. Prioritizing the accurate reporting of motor and nonmotor phenotypes is crucial for future cerebral palsy genetic studies to further understand the underlying neurobiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":15319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"500-509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinically Relevant Genes Identified in Cerebral Palsy Cohorts Following Evaluation of the Clinical Description and Phenotype: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Yana A Wilson, Natasha Garrity, Hayley Smithers-Sheedy, Shona Goldsmith, Tasneem Karim, Georgina Henry, Simon Paget, Maria Kyriagis, Nadia Badawi, Gareth Baynam, Jozef Gecz, Sarah McIntyre\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08830738241277231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A growing number of genes have been identified in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP); however, many of these studies have poor compliance with the cerebral palsy clinical description. This systematic review aimed to assess the quality of the cerebral palsy clinical description/phenotype in cerebral palsy genetic studies published between 2010 and 2024 and report clinically relevant genes based on the quality of the cerebral palsy phenotype. An expert panel developed 6 criteria to review the reported cerebral palsy phenotype/description for each included study. Clinically relevant genes were extracted from each study and stratified into 2 tiers based on the quality. Eighteen studies were included. There was high confidence in the reported cerebral palsy description/phenotype from 8 studies. Of the initial 373 clinically relevant genes, 85 were tier II genes. Individual cerebral palsy motor disorder and phenotype data were absent for 349 of these individuals, limiting further analysis. The tier I gene list was composed of 6 genes: <i>ATL1</i>, <i>COL4A1</i>, <i>GNAO1</i>, <i>KIF1A</i>, <i>SPAST</i>, and <i>TUBA1A</i>. Bilateral spasticity was the most common motor disorder reported in individuals with variants in all 6 genes, and most individuals had accompanying conditions. Prioritizing the accurate reporting of motor and nonmotor phenotypes is crucial for future cerebral palsy genetic studies to further understand the underlying neurobiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"500-509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738241277231\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738241277231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinically Relevant Genes Identified in Cerebral Palsy Cohorts Following Evaluation of the Clinical Description and Phenotype: A Systematic Review.
A growing number of genes have been identified in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP); however, many of these studies have poor compliance with the cerebral palsy clinical description. This systematic review aimed to assess the quality of the cerebral palsy clinical description/phenotype in cerebral palsy genetic studies published between 2010 and 2024 and report clinically relevant genes based on the quality of the cerebral palsy phenotype. An expert panel developed 6 criteria to review the reported cerebral palsy phenotype/description for each included study. Clinically relevant genes were extracted from each study and stratified into 2 tiers based on the quality. Eighteen studies were included. There was high confidence in the reported cerebral palsy description/phenotype from 8 studies. Of the initial 373 clinically relevant genes, 85 were tier II genes. Individual cerebral palsy motor disorder and phenotype data were absent for 349 of these individuals, limiting further analysis. The tier I gene list was composed of 6 genes: ATL1, COL4A1, GNAO1, KIF1A, SPAST, and TUBA1A. Bilateral spasticity was the most common motor disorder reported in individuals with variants in all 6 genes, and most individuals had accompanying conditions. Prioritizing the accurate reporting of motor and nonmotor phenotypes is crucial for future cerebral palsy genetic studies to further understand the underlying neurobiology.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Child Neurology (JCN) embraces peer-reviewed clinical and investigative studies from a wide-variety of neuroscience disciplines. Focusing on the needs of neurologic patients from birth to age 18 years, JCN covers topics ranging from assessment of new and changing therapies and procedures; diagnosis, evaluation, and management of neurologic, neuropsychiatric, and neurodevelopmental disorders; and pathophysiology of central nervous system diseases.