在食品和饲料中封装酵母菌作为益生菌:系统综述与元分析》。

IF 4.4 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1007/s12602-024-10331-2
Isabel Marie Grambusch, Caroline Schmitz, Cláudia Schlabitz, Rodrigo Gay Ducati, Daniel Neutzling Lehn, Claucia Fernanda Volken de Souza
{"title":"在食品和饲料中封装酵母菌作为益生菌:系统综述与元分析》。","authors":"Isabel Marie Grambusch, Caroline Schmitz, Cláudia Schlabitz, Rodrigo Gay Ducati, Daniel Neutzling Lehn, Claucia Fernanda Volken de Souza","doi":"10.1007/s12602-024-10331-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Probiotics, particularly yeasts from the genus Saccharomyces, are valuable for their health benefits and potential as antibiotic alternatives. To be effective, these microorganisms must withstand harsh environmental conditions, necessitating advanced protective technologies such as encapsulation to maintain probiotic viability during processing, storage, and passage through the digestive system. This review and meta-analysis aims to describe and compare methods and agents used for encapsulating Saccharomyces spp., examining operating conditions, yeast origins, and species. It provides an overview of the literature on the health benefits of nutritional yeast consumption. A bibliographic survey was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The meta-analysis compared encapsulation methods regarding their viability after encapsulation and exposure to the gastrointestinal tract. Nineteen studies were selected after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria. Freeze drying was found to be the most efficient for cell survival, while ionic gelation was best for maintaining viability after exposure to the gastrointestinal tract. Consequently, the combination of freeze drying and ionic gelation proved most effective in maintaining high cell viability during encapsulation, storage, and consumption. Research on probiotics for human food and animal feed indicates that combining freeze drying and ionic gelation effectively protects Saccharomyces spp.; however, industrial scalability must be considered. Reports on yeast encapsulation using agro-industrial residues as encapsulants offer promising strategies for preserving potential probiotic yeasts, contributing to the environmental sustainability of industrial processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20506,"journal":{"name":"Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins","volume":" ","pages":"1979-1995"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Encapsulation of Saccharomyces spp. for Use as Probiotic in Food and Feed: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Marie Grambusch, Caroline Schmitz, Cláudia Schlabitz, Rodrigo Gay Ducati, Daniel Neutzling Lehn, Claucia Fernanda Volken de Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12602-024-10331-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Probiotics, particularly yeasts from the genus Saccharomyces, are valuable for their health benefits and potential as antibiotic alternatives. To be effective, these microorganisms must withstand harsh environmental conditions, necessitating advanced protective technologies such as encapsulation to maintain probiotic viability during processing, storage, and passage through the digestive system. This review and meta-analysis aims to describe and compare methods and agents used for encapsulating Saccharomyces spp., examining operating conditions, yeast origins, and species. It provides an overview of the literature on the health benefits of nutritional yeast consumption. A bibliographic survey was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The meta-analysis compared encapsulation methods regarding their viability after encapsulation and exposure to the gastrointestinal tract. Nineteen studies were selected after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria. Freeze drying was found to be the most efficient for cell survival, while ionic gelation was best for maintaining viability after exposure to the gastrointestinal tract. Consequently, the combination of freeze drying and ionic gelation proved most effective in maintaining high cell viability during encapsulation, storage, and consumption. Research on probiotics for human food and animal feed indicates that combining freeze drying and ionic gelation effectively protects Saccharomyces spp.; however, industrial scalability must be considered. Reports on yeast encapsulation using agro-industrial residues as encapsulants offer promising strategies for preserving potential probiotic yeasts, contributing to the environmental sustainability of industrial processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1979-1995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-024-10331-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-024-10331-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

益生菌,尤其是酵母菌属的酵母菌,因其对健康的益处和作为抗生素替代品的潜力而具有重要价值。这些微生物必须能够承受恶劣的环境条件,因此需要采用先进的保护技术,如封装技术,以保持益生菌在加工、储存和通过消化系统过程中的活力。本综述和荟萃分析旨在描述和比较用于封装酵母菌属的方法和制剂,研究操作条件、酵母来源和种类。它概述了有关食用营养酵母有益健康的文献。按照《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南进行了文献调查。荟萃分析比较了封装方法在封装和暴露于胃肠道后的存活率。采用纳入/排除标准后,选出了 19 项研究。研究发现,冷冻干燥法对细胞存活最有效,而离子凝胶法在暴露于胃肠道后保持细胞活力的效果最好。因此,冷冻干燥和离子凝胶技术的结合被证明能最有效地在封装、储存和食用过程中保持细胞的高存活率。对人类食品和动物饲料中益生菌的研究表明,冷冻干燥和离子凝胶技术的结合能有效保护酵母菌,但必须考虑工业可扩展性。有关使用农用工业残留物作为封装剂进行酵母封装的报道为保存潜在的益生菌酵母提供了前景广阔的策略,有助于实现工业过程的环境可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Encapsulation of Saccharomyces spp. for Use as Probiotic in Food and Feed: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Probiotics, particularly yeasts from the genus Saccharomyces, are valuable for their health benefits and potential as antibiotic alternatives. To be effective, these microorganisms must withstand harsh environmental conditions, necessitating advanced protective technologies such as encapsulation to maintain probiotic viability during processing, storage, and passage through the digestive system. This review and meta-analysis aims to describe and compare methods and agents used for encapsulating Saccharomyces spp., examining operating conditions, yeast origins, and species. It provides an overview of the literature on the health benefits of nutritional yeast consumption. A bibliographic survey was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The meta-analysis compared encapsulation methods regarding their viability after encapsulation and exposure to the gastrointestinal tract. Nineteen studies were selected after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria. Freeze drying was found to be the most efficient for cell survival, while ionic gelation was best for maintaining viability after exposure to the gastrointestinal tract. Consequently, the combination of freeze drying and ionic gelation proved most effective in maintaining high cell viability during encapsulation, storage, and consumption. Research on probiotics for human food and animal feed indicates that combining freeze drying and ionic gelation effectively protects Saccharomyces spp.; however, industrial scalability must be considered. Reports on yeast encapsulation using agro-industrial residues as encapsulants offer promising strategies for preserving potential probiotic yeasts, contributing to the environmental sustainability of industrial processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGYMICROB-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
140
期刊介绍: Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins publishes reviews, original articles, letters and short notes and technical/methodological communications aimed at advancing fundamental knowledge and exploration of the applications of probiotics, natural antimicrobial proteins and their derivatives in biomedical, agricultural, veterinary, food, and cosmetic products. The Journal welcomes fundamental research articles and reports on applications of these microorganisms and substances, and encourages structural studies and studies that correlate the structure and functional properties of antimicrobial proteins.
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Protein Secretomes of Enterococcus durans on ex vivo Human Gut Microbiome. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Regulates Host IFN-I Through the RIG-I Signalling Pathway to Inhibit Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Infection. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ELF051 Alleviates Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea by Regulating Intestinal Inflammation and Gut Microbiota. A Two Bacteriocinogenic Ligilactobacillus Strain Association Inhibits Growth, Adhesion, and Invasion of Salmonella in a Simulated Chicken Gut Environment. Gum Arabic/Chitosan Coacervates for Encapsulation and Protection of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus in Storage and Gastrointestinal Environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1