健康成人使用 COVID-19 后的最大呼吸压力与参考材料的比较:前瞻性队列研究(SECURe 研究)。

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiological Reports Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.14814/phy2.16184
Thora Wesenberg Helt, Jan Christensen, Ronan M G Berg, Thomas Kromann Lund, Anna Kalhauge, Frederikke Rönsholt, Daria Podlekareva, Elisabeth Arndal, Flemming Madsen, Mathias Munkholm, Birgitte Hanel, Anne-Mette Lebech, Terese Lea Katzenstein, Jann Mortensen
{"title":"健康成人使用 COVID-19 后的最大呼吸压力与参考材料的比较:前瞻性队列研究(SECURe 研究)。","authors":"Thora Wesenberg Helt, Jan Christensen, Ronan M G Berg, Thomas Kromann Lund, Anna Kalhauge, Frederikke Rönsholt, Daria Podlekareva, Elisabeth Arndal, Flemming Madsen, Mathias Munkholm, Birgitte Hanel, Anne-Mette Lebech, Terese Lea Katzenstein, Jann Mortensen","doi":"10.14814/phy2.16184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After COVID-19 long term respiratory symptoms and reduced lung function including maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) have been reported. However, no studies have looked at MIP and MEP in all disease groups and the reference materials collection methods differ substantially. We aimed to determine MIP and MEP in individuals after COVID-19 infection with different disease severity using reference material of healthy control group obtained using the same standardized method. Patients with COVID-19 were included March 2020-March 2021 at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. MIP and MEP were measured using microRPM. Predicted MIP and MEP were calculated using reference material obtained from 298 healthy adults aged 18-97 years using the same method. In SECURe, 145 participants were measured median 5 months after COVID-19 diagnosis and of these 16% had reduced MIP and/or MEP. There was reduced spirometry and total lung capacity, but not reduced diffusion capacity in those with abnormal MIP and/or MEP compared with normal MIP and MEP. Of those with reduced MIP and/or MEP at 5 months, 80% still had reduced MIP and/or MEP at 12 months follow-up. In conclusion, few have reduced MIP and/or MEP 5 months after COVID-19 and little improvement was seen over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"12 17","pages":"e16184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11381190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximal respiratory pressure after COVID-19 compared with reference material in healthy adults: A prospective cohort study (The SECURe study).\",\"authors\":\"Thora Wesenberg Helt, Jan Christensen, Ronan M G Berg, Thomas Kromann Lund, Anna Kalhauge, Frederikke Rönsholt, Daria Podlekareva, Elisabeth Arndal, Flemming Madsen, Mathias Munkholm, Birgitte Hanel, Anne-Mette Lebech, Terese Lea Katzenstein, Jann Mortensen\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.16184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>After COVID-19 long term respiratory symptoms and reduced lung function including maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) have been reported. However, no studies have looked at MIP and MEP in all disease groups and the reference materials collection methods differ substantially. We aimed to determine MIP and MEP in individuals after COVID-19 infection with different disease severity using reference material of healthy control group obtained using the same standardized method. Patients with COVID-19 were included March 2020-March 2021 at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. MIP and MEP were measured using microRPM. Predicted MIP and MEP were calculated using reference material obtained from 298 healthy adults aged 18-97 years using the same method. In SECURe, 145 participants were measured median 5 months after COVID-19 diagnosis and of these 16% had reduced MIP and/or MEP. There was reduced spirometry and total lung capacity, but not reduced diffusion capacity in those with abnormal MIP and/or MEP compared with normal MIP and MEP. Of those with reduced MIP and/or MEP at 5 months, 80% still had reduced MIP and/or MEP at 12 months follow-up. In conclusion, few have reduced MIP and/or MEP 5 months after COVID-19 and little improvement was seen over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"12 17\",\"pages\":\"e16184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11381190/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.16184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.16184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有报告称,COVID-19 后出现了长期呼吸道症状和肺功能下降,包括最大吸气压(MIP)和最大呼气压(MEP)。然而,还没有研究对所有疾病组的 MIP 和 MEP 进行过调查,而且参考材料的收集方法也存在很大差异。我们的目的是利用采用相同标准化方法获得的健康对照组参考材料,测定不同疾病严重程度的 COVID-19 感染者的 MIP 和 MEP。2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月,COVID-19 患者被纳入丹麦 Rigshospitalet 医院。使用 microRPM 测量 MIP 和 MEP。预测的 MIP 和 MEP 是使用从 298 名 18-97 岁健康成人那里获得的参考材料,以相同的方法计算得出的。在 SECURe 中,145 名参与者在确诊 COVID-19 后 5 个月进行了中位测量,其中 16% 的人 MIP 和/或 MEP 下降。与 MIP 和/或 MEP 正常者相比,MIP 和/或 MEP 异常者的肺活量和总肺活量减少,但弥散能力并未减少。在5个月时MIP和/或MEP降低的患者中,80%在随访12个月时MIP和/或MEP仍然降低。总之,COVID-19治疗5个月后,MIP和/或MEP降低的患者很少,而且随着时间的推移,情况几乎没有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maximal respiratory pressure after COVID-19 compared with reference material in healthy adults: A prospective cohort study (The SECURe study).

After COVID-19 long term respiratory symptoms and reduced lung function including maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) have been reported. However, no studies have looked at MIP and MEP in all disease groups and the reference materials collection methods differ substantially. We aimed to determine MIP and MEP in individuals after COVID-19 infection with different disease severity using reference material of healthy control group obtained using the same standardized method. Patients with COVID-19 were included March 2020-March 2021 at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. MIP and MEP were measured using microRPM. Predicted MIP and MEP were calculated using reference material obtained from 298 healthy adults aged 18-97 years using the same method. In SECURe, 145 participants were measured median 5 months after COVID-19 diagnosis and of these 16% had reduced MIP and/or MEP. There was reduced spirometry and total lung capacity, but not reduced diffusion capacity in those with abnormal MIP and/or MEP compared with normal MIP and MEP. Of those with reduced MIP and/or MEP at 5 months, 80% still had reduced MIP and/or MEP at 12 months follow-up. In conclusion, few have reduced MIP and/or MEP 5 months after COVID-19 and little improvement was seen over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of occupational exposure: A study on cardiovascular autonomic functions of male gas station attendants in Sri Lanka. Physiologists as medical scientists: An early warning from the German academic system. Examining the effect of salbutamol use in ozone air pollution by people with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Reverse epidemiology of obesity paradox: Fact or fiction? Spinal pain prevalence and associated determinants: A population-based study using the National Survey for Wales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1