化疗难治性转移性结直肠癌患者接受曲氟尿苷/替吡拉西或瑞戈非尼治疗后的边度与生存期之间的关系

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Oncologist Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae235
Kai-Yuan Hsiao, Hsin-Pao Chen, Kun-Ming Rau, Kuang-Wen Liu, Ben-Chang Shia, Wei-Shan Chang, Hao-Yun Liang, Meng-Che Hsieh
{"title":"化疗难治性转移性结直肠癌患者接受曲氟尿苷/替吡拉西或瑞戈非尼治疗后的边度与生存期之间的关系","authors":"Kai-Yuan Hsiao, Hsin-Pao Chen, Kun-Ming Rau, Kuang-Wen Liu, Ben-Chang Shia, Wei-Shan Chang, Hao-Yun Liang, Meng-Che Hsieh","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of sidedness on survival of later-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is undetermined. This study aimed to investigate the association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) or regorafenib or both.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 or regorafenib between 2015 and 2020 was retrospectively collected. Patients were stratified into TAS-102 first and regorafenib first, then subdivided into TAS-102 followed by regorafenib (T-R) and regorafenib followed by TAS-102 (R-T) groups. The oncologic outcomes were presented with time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 376 TAS-102 patients and 376 regorafenib patients were included for outcomes comparison. TTF had insignificant differences while OS was significantly different between TAS-102 and regorafenib groups. Median TTF and OS were 1.9 months versus 2.0 months (P = .701) and 9.1 months versus 7.0 months (P = .008) in TAS-102 and regorafenib, respectively. The OS benefits were consistent regardless primary tumor location. Subgroup analysis with 174 T-R patients and 174 R-T patients was investigated for treatment sequences. TTF and OS had significant differences in both groups. Median TTF and OS were 8.5 months versus 6.3 months (P = .001) and 14.4 months versus 12.6 months (P = .035) in T-R and R-T groups, respectively. The TTF and OS benefits were persisted regardless primary tumor location.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAS-102 first provided a better survival benefit in chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC across all sidedness. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"e1669-e1679"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib.\",\"authors\":\"Kai-Yuan Hsiao, Hsin-Pao Chen, Kun-Ming Rau, Kuang-Wen Liu, Ben-Chang Shia, Wei-Shan Chang, Hao-Yun Liang, Meng-Che Hsieh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyae235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of sidedness on survival of later-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is undetermined. This study aimed to investigate the association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) or regorafenib or both.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 or regorafenib between 2015 and 2020 was retrospectively collected. Patients were stratified into TAS-102 first and regorafenib first, then subdivided into TAS-102 followed by regorafenib (T-R) and regorafenib followed by TAS-102 (R-T) groups. The oncologic outcomes were presented with time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 376 TAS-102 patients and 376 regorafenib patients were included for outcomes comparison. TTF had insignificant differences while OS was significantly different between TAS-102 and regorafenib groups. Median TTF and OS were 1.9 months versus 2.0 months (P = .701) and 9.1 months versus 7.0 months (P = .008) in TAS-102 and regorafenib, respectively. The OS benefits were consistent regardless primary tumor location. Subgroup analysis with 174 T-R patients and 174 R-T patients was investigated for treatment sequences. TTF and OS had significant differences in both groups. Median TTF and OS were 8.5 months versus 6.3 months (P = .001) and 14.4 months versus 12.6 months (P = .035) in T-R and R-T groups, respectively. The TTF and OS benefits were persisted regardless primary tumor location.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAS-102 first provided a better survival benefit in chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC across all sidedness. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1669-e1679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630785/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae235\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:侧切对转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者后期治疗生存期的影响尚未确定。本研究旨在调查接受三氟尿苷/替吡拉西(TAS-102)或瑞戈非尼或两者治疗的化疗难治性 mCRC 患者的偏侧性与生存率之间的关系:回顾性收集2015年至2020年间接受TAS-102或瑞戈非尼治疗的mCRC患者。将患者分为先接受TAS-102治疗组和先接受瑞戈非尼治疗组,然后再细分为先接受TAS-102治疗再接受瑞戈非尼治疗组(T-R)和先接受瑞戈非尼治疗再接受TAS-102治疗组(R-T)。肿瘤学结果显示为治疗失败时间(TTF)和总生存期(OS):结果:经过配对,376名TAS-102患者和376名瑞戈非尼患者被纳入结果比较。TTF在TAS-102组和瑞戈非尼组之间差异不显著,而OS在TAS-102组和瑞戈非尼组之间差异显著。TAS-102组和瑞戈非尼组的中位TTF和OS分别为1.9个月对2.0个月(P = .701)和9.1个月对7.0个月(P = .008)。无论原发肿瘤位置如何,OS获益都是一致的。研究人员对174名T-R患者和174名R-T患者的治疗顺序进行了分组分析。两组的TTF和OS均有显著差异。T-R组和R-T组的中位TTF和OS分别为8.5个月对6.3个月(P = .001)和14.4个月对12.6个月(P = .035)。无论原发肿瘤位置如何,TTF和OS获益均持续存在:结论:TAS-102首次为化疗难治的mCRC患者带来了更好的生存获益。我们需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证我们的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib.

Background: The impact of sidedness on survival of later-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is undetermined. This study aimed to investigate the association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) or regorafenib or both.

Patients and methods: Patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 or regorafenib between 2015 and 2020 was retrospectively collected. Patients were stratified into TAS-102 first and regorafenib first, then subdivided into TAS-102 followed by regorafenib (T-R) and regorafenib followed by TAS-102 (R-T) groups. The oncologic outcomes were presented with time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS).

Results: After matching, 376 TAS-102 patients and 376 regorafenib patients were included for outcomes comparison. TTF had insignificant differences while OS was significantly different between TAS-102 and regorafenib groups. Median TTF and OS were 1.9 months versus 2.0 months (P = .701) and 9.1 months versus 7.0 months (P = .008) in TAS-102 and regorafenib, respectively. The OS benefits were consistent regardless primary tumor location. Subgroup analysis with 174 T-R patients and 174 R-T patients was investigated for treatment sequences. TTF and OS had significant differences in both groups. Median TTF and OS were 8.5 months versus 6.3 months (P = .001) and 14.4 months versus 12.6 months (P = .035) in T-R and R-T groups, respectively. The TTF and OS benefits were persisted regardless primary tumor location.

Conclusion: TAS-102 first provided a better survival benefit in chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC across all sidedness. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
期刊最新文献
Updated overall survival in patients with prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the phase III TIVO-3 study. The pathologic and genomic evolution of primary malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: retrospective cohort study and case-control genomic analysis. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors Show Activity in Colorectal Cancer With ALK Rearrangements: Case Series and Literature Review. Primary Resistance to RET Inhibition in a RET Fusion-Positive Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma. Association of opioid use with survival in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: it is time for evidence-based behaviors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1