椎管直径与椎弓根尺寸的 CT 相关性,以实现更安全的颈椎后路椎弓根螺钉固定。

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_590_2024
Yushi Nagano, Hitoshi Yamahata, Ryutaro Makino, Nayuta Higa, Jun Sugata, Shingo Fujio, Ryosuke Hanaya
{"title":"椎管直径与椎弓根尺寸的 CT 相关性,以实现更安全的颈椎后路椎弓根螺钉固定。","authors":"Yushi Nagano, Hitoshi Yamahata, Ryutaro Makino, Nayuta Higa, Jun Sugata, Shingo Fujio, Ryosuke Hanaya","doi":"10.25259/SNI_590_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilizing computed tomography (CT) studies, we correlated cervical spinal canal diameters (SCDs) with pedicle size between the C3 and C7 levels to more safely perform posterior cervical surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed CT studies for 71 patients with cranial or spinal disorders and correlated the cervical SCD with the pedicle outer width (POW) between the C3 and C7 levels. Patients were divided into normal (SCD ≥12 mm at any level, <i>n</i> = 30) and stenosis groups (SCD <12 mm at any level, <i>n</i> = 41).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C7 exhibited the largest SCD and POW values, while C3 and C4 exhibited the smallest SCD and POW values. Moderate correlations (r = 0.3, <i>P</i> = 0.002) were observed at the C3 and C4 levels but no significant correlations were observed from the C5 to C7 levels. For SCD values, the normal group demonstrated significantly greater values between the C3 and C7 levels versus the stenosis group. For POW values, only the C4 level differed significantly between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.014, Mann-Whitney U-test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative pedicle size evaluation remains an essential manoeuvre before performing cervical C3-C7 pedicle screw placement. In 71 cervical CT studies, we found no consistent correlation between POW and SCD values, indicating that it is difficult to estimate POW values based on spinal canal size.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CT correlation of spinal canal diameter with pedicle size for safer posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation.\",\"authors\":\"Yushi Nagano, Hitoshi Yamahata, Ryutaro Makino, Nayuta Higa, Jun Sugata, Shingo Fujio, Ryosuke Hanaya\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/SNI_590_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilizing computed tomography (CT) studies, we correlated cervical spinal canal diameters (SCDs) with pedicle size between the C3 and C7 levels to more safely perform posterior cervical surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed CT studies for 71 patients with cranial or spinal disorders and correlated the cervical SCD with the pedicle outer width (POW) between the C3 and C7 levels. Patients were divided into normal (SCD ≥12 mm at any level, <i>n</i> = 30) and stenosis groups (SCD <12 mm at any level, <i>n</i> = 41).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C7 exhibited the largest SCD and POW values, while C3 and C4 exhibited the smallest SCD and POW values. Moderate correlations (r = 0.3, <i>P</i> = 0.002) were observed at the C3 and C4 levels but no significant correlations were observed from the C5 to C7 levels. For SCD values, the normal group demonstrated significantly greater values between the C3 and C7 levels versus the stenosis group. For POW values, only the C4 level differed significantly between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.014, Mann-Whitney U-test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative pedicle size evaluation remains an essential manoeuvre before performing cervical C3-C7 pedicle screw placement. In 71 cervical CT studies, we found no consistent correlation between POW and SCD values, indicating that it is difficult to estimate POW values based on spinal canal size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380912/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_590_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_590_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:利用计算机断层扫描(CT)研究,我们将颈椎椎管直径(SCD)与C3和C7水平之间的椎弓根大小相关联,以便更安全地实施颈椎后路手术:我们回顾性地分析了71名颅骨或脊柱疾病患者的CT检查结果,并将颈椎椎管直径(SCD)与C3和C7水平之间的椎弓根外宽(POW)相关联。患者被分为正常组(任何级别的SCD≥12毫米,n = 30)和狭窄组(SCD n = 41):结果:C7 的 SCD 和 POW 值最大,而 C3 和 C4 的 SCD 和 POW 值最小。在 C3 和 C4 水平观察到中度相关性(r = 0.3,P = 0.002),但在 C5 至 C7 水平未观察到显著相关性。在 SCD 值方面,正常组与狭窄组相比,C3 和 C7 水平的值明显更大。就POW值而言,两组之间只有C4水平有显著差异(P = 0.014,曼-惠特尼U检验):结论:在进行颈椎C3-C7椎弓根螺钉置入术之前,术前椎弓根尺寸评估仍然是一项重要的操作。在 71 项颈椎 CT 研究中,我们发现 POW 值和 SCD 值之间没有一致的相关性,这表明很难根据椎管大小来估计 POW 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CT correlation of spinal canal diameter with pedicle size for safer posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation.

Background: Utilizing computed tomography (CT) studies, we correlated cervical spinal canal diameters (SCDs) with pedicle size between the C3 and C7 levels to more safely perform posterior cervical surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed CT studies for 71 patients with cranial or spinal disorders and correlated the cervical SCD with the pedicle outer width (POW) between the C3 and C7 levels. Patients were divided into normal (SCD ≥12 mm at any level, n = 30) and stenosis groups (SCD <12 mm at any level, n = 41).

Results: C7 exhibited the largest SCD and POW values, while C3 and C4 exhibited the smallest SCD and POW values. Moderate correlations (r = 0.3, P = 0.002) were observed at the C3 and C4 levels but no significant correlations were observed from the C5 to C7 levels. For SCD values, the normal group demonstrated significantly greater values between the C3 and C7 levels versus the stenosis group. For POW values, only the C4 level differed significantly between the two groups (P = 0.014, Mann-Whitney U-test).

Conclusion: Preoperative pedicle size evaluation remains an essential manoeuvre before performing cervical C3-C7 pedicle screw placement. In 71 cervical CT studies, we found no consistent correlation between POW and SCD values, indicating that it is difficult to estimate POW values based on spinal canal size.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of spontaneous direct vertebral artery - External vertebral venous plexus fistula in the upper cervical portion. Before blaming glucocorticoids for prolonged postoperative hypotension, alternative explanations must be carefully ruled out. Hybrid open-endovascular onyx embolization of spinal type IVb perimedullary spinal arteriovenous fistula through direct posterior spinal vein access: A case report. Liberal use of ketamine is on the rise! A critical warning!! Occurrence of malignant cerebral infarction following intracranial hematoma evacuation in traumatic brain injury: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1