在对慢性硬膜下血肿进行钻孔引流术后,采用气囊下引流管与剥离气囊下间隙并在不使用引流管的情况下进行闭合术的对比。

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2024-08-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_363_2024
Hosam-Eldin Abd-Elazim Habib, Hossam Elnoamany, Ahmed Gabry Elnaggar
{"title":"在对慢性硬膜下血肿进行钻孔引流术后,采用气囊下引流管与剥离气囊下间隙并在不使用引流管的情况下进行闭合术的对比。","authors":"Hosam-Eldin Abd-Elazim Habib, Hossam Elnoamany, Ahmed Gabry Elnaggar","doi":"10.25259/SNI_363_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a collection of blood, blood degradation products, and fluid that accumulate on the surface of the brain between its arachnoid and dural coverings. This study is to evaluate the efficacy of subgaleal drain (SGD) versus subgaleal dissection without drainage as adjuncts to burr-hole evacuation of CSDH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted utilizing the data of 60 patients operated for symptomatic CSDH. Patients were divided into two groups, each thirty consecutive patients: Group I, in which a SGD was inserted after CSDH evacuation through a burr-hole; and Group II, the hematoma was evacuated as in the Group I, but with no SGD insertion but instead a subgaleal pocket was created for drainage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The neurological improvement at 24 h, discharge, 2 weeks, and 6 months after surgery was comparable in both groups. The overall recurrence was 4 cases (4/60, 6.7%). The rate of recurrence and surgical infection rate were comparable in both groups. Both groups showed similar incidences of postoperative seizures, bleeding, rates of medical complications, and neurological deficits. The overall postoperative mortality was five cases (5/60, 8.3%) with no significant difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blunt dissection to open the subgaleal space and closure without a drain is a safe and efficient alternative to the insertion of a drain after the burr-hole evacuation of CSDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"15 ","pages":"288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subgaleal drain versus dissection of subgaleal space and closure without drain after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma.\",\"authors\":\"Hosam-Eldin Abd-Elazim Habib, Hossam Elnoamany, Ahmed Gabry Elnaggar\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/SNI_363_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a collection of blood, blood degradation products, and fluid that accumulate on the surface of the brain between its arachnoid and dural coverings. This study is to evaluate the efficacy of subgaleal drain (SGD) versus subgaleal dissection without drainage as adjuncts to burr-hole evacuation of CSDH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted utilizing the data of 60 patients operated for symptomatic CSDH. Patients were divided into two groups, each thirty consecutive patients: Group I, in which a SGD was inserted after CSDH evacuation through a burr-hole; and Group II, the hematoma was evacuated as in the Group I, but with no SGD insertion but instead a subgaleal pocket was created for drainage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The neurological improvement at 24 h, discharge, 2 weeks, and 6 months after surgery was comparable in both groups. The overall recurrence was 4 cases (4/60, 6.7%). The rate of recurrence and surgical infection rate were comparable in both groups. Both groups showed similar incidences of postoperative seizures, bleeding, rates of medical complications, and neurological deficits. The overall postoperative mortality was five cases (5/60, 8.3%) with no significant difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blunt dissection to open the subgaleal space and closure without a drain is a safe and efficient alternative to the insertion of a drain after the burr-hole evacuation of CSDH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380829/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_363_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_363_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)是积聚在大脑表面蛛网膜和硬脑膜覆盖层之间的血液、血液降解产物和液体。本研究旨在评估在对 CSDH 进行钻孔排空术时,采用脑膜下引流术(SGD)与不采用引流术的脑膜下剥离术的辅助治疗效果:利用 60 例因症状性 CSDH 而接受手术的患者的数据进行了一项回顾性研究。患者被分为两组,每组 30 名连续患者:第一组,在通过毛细孔排空 CSDH 后插入 SGD;第二组,与第一组一样排空血肿,但不插入 SGD,而是在气门下开袋引流:两组患者术后24小时、出院、2周和6个月的神经功能改善情况相当。总复发率为 4 例(4/60,6.7%)。两组的复发率和手术感染率相当。两组术后癫痫发作、出血、内科并发症和神经功能缺损的发生率相似。术后总死亡率为 5 例(5/60,8.3%),组间无明显差异:结论:钝性剥离以打开气门下间隙并在不插入引流管的情况下进行闭合是一种安全有效的方法,可替代在 CSDH 的钻孔排空术后插入引流管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subgaleal drain versus dissection of subgaleal space and closure without drain after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma.

Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a collection of blood, blood degradation products, and fluid that accumulate on the surface of the brain between its arachnoid and dural coverings. This study is to evaluate the efficacy of subgaleal drain (SGD) versus subgaleal dissection without drainage as adjuncts to burr-hole evacuation of CSDH.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted utilizing the data of 60 patients operated for symptomatic CSDH. Patients were divided into two groups, each thirty consecutive patients: Group I, in which a SGD was inserted after CSDH evacuation through a burr-hole; and Group II, the hematoma was evacuated as in the Group I, but with no SGD insertion but instead a subgaleal pocket was created for drainage.

Results: The neurological improvement at 24 h, discharge, 2 weeks, and 6 months after surgery was comparable in both groups. The overall recurrence was 4 cases (4/60, 6.7%). The rate of recurrence and surgical infection rate were comparable in both groups. Both groups showed similar incidences of postoperative seizures, bleeding, rates of medical complications, and neurological deficits. The overall postoperative mortality was five cases (5/60, 8.3%) with no significant difference between groups.

Conclusion: Blunt dissection to open the subgaleal space and closure without a drain is a safe and efficient alternative to the insertion of a drain after the burr-hole evacuation of CSDH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drainage of middle cranial fossa epidural abscess through mastoidectomy: Our experience and review of the literature. Giant intracranial tuberculomas in children: An unexpected diagnosis and difficult management - About two cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgical skills conference for medical students: A before and after study. Transarterial embolization for anterior cranial fossa dural arteriovenous fistula based on multi-modal three-dimensional imaging. Monitoring of visual-evoked potentials during fat packing in endoscopic resection of a giant pituitary adenoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1