在线平台上的最佳产品线销售模式

IF 8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2024.07.003
{"title":"在线平台上的最佳产品线销售模式","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jretai.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The burgeoning success of online retailing has prompted numerous manufacturers to sell their product lines through digital platforms. Despite this trend, the optimal product-line selling mode for both manufacturers and online platforms remains ambiguous. This study aims to address this uncertainty by developing an analytical model. In this model, a manufacturer offers a product line consisting of two quality-differentiated products. Concurrently, an e-tailer (online platform) provides both the first-party and third-party modes, catering to consumers with heterogeneous preferences for product quality. The analysis reveals that when the high-quality product's quality level is sufficiently low, the manufacturer achieves maximum profit by wholesaling the high-quality product with the first-party mode but directly selling the low-quality product via the third-party mode; otherwise, the manufacturer maximizes profit by directly selling both products via the third-party mode. For the e-tailer, when the high-quality product's quality level is moderate, he can gain the highest profit by encouraging the manufacturer to wholesale both products with the first-party mode. However, when the high-quality product's quality level is sufficiently low (high), the e-tailer can obtain the highest profit under the case where the manufacturer sells the high-quality product via the third-party (first-party) mode but distributes the low-quality product with the first-party (third-party) mode. The intuition lies in the competition dynamics and the double marginalization effect under different selling modes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The optimal product-line selling mode in online platforms\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretai.2024.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The burgeoning success of online retailing has prompted numerous manufacturers to sell their product lines through digital platforms. Despite this trend, the optimal product-line selling mode for both manufacturers and online platforms remains ambiguous. This study aims to address this uncertainty by developing an analytical model. In this model, a manufacturer offers a product line consisting of two quality-differentiated products. Concurrently, an e-tailer (online platform) provides both the first-party and third-party modes, catering to consumers with heterogeneous preferences for product quality. The analysis reveals that when the high-quality product's quality level is sufficiently low, the manufacturer achieves maximum profit by wholesaling the high-quality product with the first-party mode but directly selling the low-quality product via the third-party mode; otherwise, the manufacturer maximizes profit by directly selling both products via the third-party mode. For the e-tailer, when the high-quality product's quality level is moderate, he can gain the highest profit by encouraging the manufacturer to wholesale both products with the first-party mode. However, when the high-quality product's quality level is sufficiently low (high), the e-tailer can obtain the highest profit under the case where the manufacturer sells the high-quality product via the third-party (first-party) mode but distributes the low-quality product with the first-party (third-party) mode. The intuition lies in the competition dynamics and the double marginalization effect under different selling modes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243592400040X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243592400040X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线零售业的蓬勃发展促使众多制造商通过数字平台销售其产品线。尽管存在这一趋势,但制造商和在线平台的最佳产品线销售模式仍不明确。本研究旨在通过建立一个分析模型来解决这一不确定性。在该模型中,制造商提供由两种质量不同的产品组成的产品线。同时,网络零售商(在线平台)提供第一方和第三方两种模式,以迎合消费者对产品质量的不同偏好。分析表明,当高质量产品的质量水平足够低时,制造商通过第一方模式批发高质量产品,但通过第三方模式直接销售低质量产品,从而获得最大利润;反之,制造商通过第三方模式直接销售两种产品,从而获得最大利润。对于网络零售商来说,当高质量产品的质量水平适中时,他可以通过鼓励制造商以第一方模式批发两种产品来获得最高利润。然而,当高质量产品的质量水平足够低(高)时,在制造商通过第三方(第一方)模式销售高质量产品,而以第一方(第三方)模式分销低质量产品的情况下,网络零售商可以获得最高利润。直观的原因在于不同销售模式下的竞争态势和双重边缘化效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The optimal product-line selling mode in online platforms

The burgeoning success of online retailing has prompted numerous manufacturers to sell their product lines through digital platforms. Despite this trend, the optimal product-line selling mode for both manufacturers and online platforms remains ambiguous. This study aims to address this uncertainty by developing an analytical model. In this model, a manufacturer offers a product line consisting of two quality-differentiated products. Concurrently, an e-tailer (online platform) provides both the first-party and third-party modes, catering to consumers with heterogeneous preferences for product quality. The analysis reveals that when the high-quality product's quality level is sufficiently low, the manufacturer achieves maximum profit by wholesaling the high-quality product with the first-party mode but directly selling the low-quality product via the third-party mode; otherwise, the manufacturer maximizes profit by directly selling both products via the third-party mode. For the e-tailer, when the high-quality product's quality level is moderate, he can gain the highest profit by encouraging the manufacturer to wholesale both products with the first-party mode. However, when the high-quality product's quality level is sufficiently low (high), the e-tailer can obtain the highest profit under the case where the manufacturer sells the high-quality product via the third-party (first-party) mode but distributes the low-quality product with the first-party (third-party) mode. The intuition lies in the competition dynamics and the double marginalization effect under different selling modes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The focus of The Journal of Retailing is to advance knowledge and its practical application in the field of retailing. This includes various aspects such as retail management, evolution, and current theories. The journal covers both products and services in retail, supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, relationships between retailers and supply chain members, and direct marketing as well as emerging electronic markets for households. Articles published in the journal may take an economic or behavioral approach, but all are based on rigorous analysis and a deep understanding of relevant theories and existing literature. Empirical research follows the scientific method, employing modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis.
期刊最新文献
Bargaining with algorithms: How consumers respond to offers proposed by algorithms versus humans Quiet sellers: When introversion drives salesperson performance Understanding shoppers’ attention to price information at the point of consideration using in-store ambulatory eye-tracking FM ii: Copyright/ ID Statement Navigating the complexities of retail mergers in a changing landscape: A call for deeper insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1