向第二语言日语教师教授语用学:相关性理论方法

IF 8 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH System Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.system.2024.103472
Erika Marcet
{"title":"向第二语言日语教师教授语用学:相关性理论方法","authors":"Erika Marcet","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are few continuing professional development (CPD) courses for language instructors who want to incorporate the teaching of pragmatics, particularly outside second and foreign language (L2) English and Spanish (e.g., Cohen et al., 2023; Vellenga, 2011). Furthermore, most courses rarely include pragmatics theories that describe the cognitive processes involved in communication. To address this gap, this study assesses what pre-service and in-service instructors of L2 Japanese (n = 9) know about pragmatics and presents data from a 3-hCPD course. The CPD is based on Sperber &amp; Wilson's (1986/1995) Relevance Theory, an ostensive-inferential pragmatics theory that explains the cognitive mechanisms used to interpret utterances. These cognitive processes and how to teach them are explained through a pedagogical framework that equips instructors with the pragmatic knowledge and tools needed to help their learners achieve effective communication.</p><p>A qualitative pre- and post-test was employed to ascertain instructors' knowledge of pragmatics and ability to activate their pragmatic competence. Focus groups with each cohort were conducted to gather insights into instructors' willingness and preparedness to teach pragmatics. The CPD increased both participants' understanding of pragmatics and knowledge of how to activate learners' pragmatic competence. The data also reveals differences between pre-service and in-service teachers, as well as native and non-native speakers’ willingness to include pragmatics in their teaching.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 103472"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002549/pdfft?md5=c613a337706533e76eb97b1cf6c45d08&pid=1-s2.0-S0346251X24002549-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching pragmatics to instructors of L2 Japanese: A relevance-theoretic approach\",\"authors\":\"Erika Marcet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.system.2024.103472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There are few continuing professional development (CPD) courses for language instructors who want to incorporate the teaching of pragmatics, particularly outside second and foreign language (L2) English and Spanish (e.g., Cohen et al., 2023; Vellenga, 2011). Furthermore, most courses rarely include pragmatics theories that describe the cognitive processes involved in communication. To address this gap, this study assesses what pre-service and in-service instructors of L2 Japanese (n = 9) know about pragmatics and presents data from a 3-hCPD course. The CPD is based on Sperber &amp; Wilson's (1986/1995) Relevance Theory, an ostensive-inferential pragmatics theory that explains the cognitive mechanisms used to interpret utterances. These cognitive processes and how to teach them are explained through a pedagogical framework that equips instructors with the pragmatic knowledge and tools needed to help their learners achieve effective communication.</p><p>A qualitative pre- and post-test was employed to ascertain instructors' knowledge of pragmatics and ability to activate their pragmatic competence. Focus groups with each cohort were conducted to gather insights into instructors' willingness and preparedness to teach pragmatics. The CPD increased both participants' understanding of pragmatics and knowledge of how to activate learners' pragmatic competence. The data also reveals differences between pre-service and in-service teachers, as well as native and non-native speakers’ willingness to include pragmatics in their teaching.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002549/pdfft?md5=c613a337706533e76eb97b1cf6c45d08&pid=1-s2.0-S0346251X24002549-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002549\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002549","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于希望将语用学教学(尤其是第二语言和外语(L2)英语和西班牙语以外的语用学教学)纳入教学的语言教师而言,很少有持续专业发展(CPD)课程(例如,Cohen 等人,2023 年;Vellenga,2011 年)。此外,大多数课程很少包含描述交际认知过程的语用学理论。为了弥补这一不足,本研究评估了日语第二语言的职前和在职教师(n = 9)对语用学的了解程度,并提供了 3 小时 CPD 课程的数据。CPD 以 Sperber & Wilson(1986/1995)的 "相关性理论"(Relevance Theory)为基础。通过一个教学框架来解释这些认知过程以及如何教授这些认知过程,该框架为教师提供了语用知识和工具,以帮助他们的学习者实现有效的交流。与每个学员进行了焦点小组讨论,以深入了解教员教授语用学的意愿和准备情况。持续专业发展课程提高了参与者对语用学的理解,以及对如何激活学习者语用能力的认识。数据还显示了职前和在职教师之间的差异,以及母语和非母语教师将语用学纳入教学的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teaching pragmatics to instructors of L2 Japanese: A relevance-theoretic approach

There are few continuing professional development (CPD) courses for language instructors who want to incorporate the teaching of pragmatics, particularly outside second and foreign language (L2) English and Spanish (e.g., Cohen et al., 2023; Vellenga, 2011). Furthermore, most courses rarely include pragmatics theories that describe the cognitive processes involved in communication. To address this gap, this study assesses what pre-service and in-service instructors of L2 Japanese (n = 9) know about pragmatics and presents data from a 3-hCPD course. The CPD is based on Sperber & Wilson's (1986/1995) Relevance Theory, an ostensive-inferential pragmatics theory that explains the cognitive mechanisms used to interpret utterances. These cognitive processes and how to teach them are explained through a pedagogical framework that equips instructors with the pragmatic knowledge and tools needed to help their learners achieve effective communication.

A qualitative pre- and post-test was employed to ascertain instructors' knowledge of pragmatics and ability to activate their pragmatic competence. Focus groups with each cohort were conducted to gather insights into instructors' willingness and preparedness to teach pragmatics. The CPD increased both participants' understanding of pragmatics and knowledge of how to activate learners' pragmatic competence. The data also reveals differences between pre-service and in-service teachers, as well as native and non-native speakers’ willingness to include pragmatics in their teaching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
期刊最新文献
Negotiating academic identity under evaluation: Move-level strategies and identity profiles across abstracts and conclusions Linking textbook grammar input to writing accuracy in exam-oriented EFL systems: A CEFR-B1, corpus-based study Assessing L2 legal writing through a plain English lens: Insights on complexity, accuracy, and fluency Postgraduate students’ engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: Implications for feedback literacy of providing peer feedback Reading with a purpose: How eye movements and working memory inform comprehension across L1 and L2 English readers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1