CFD 中输入不确定性传播的高效方法及其在浮力驱动流中的应用

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113560
Ruiyun Ji , Stephan Kelm , Markus Klein
{"title":"CFD 中输入不确定性传播的高效方法及其在浮力驱动流中的应用","authors":"Ruiyun Ji ,&nbsp;Stephan Kelm ,&nbsp;Markus Klein","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Severe accident scenarios address the release of large amounts of hydrogen and steam to the containment. The formation of a flammable gas cloud could lead to a combustion and even failure of containment structures. In order to support the hydrogen mitigation method development, a detailed understanding of the gas transport and mixing process is crucial. Efforts in terms of numerical simulations such as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models have been made, which allow to investigate the complex 3D gas mixing process. One of the uncertainty sources that challenge the reliability of CFD validation results is the input uncertainty. It was assessed efficiently using the deterministic sampling method, which requires e.g., in the present case only eight binary samples for seven uncertain input parameters. However, the lean number of samples makes the direct derivation of a probability density function as well as a 95% confidence interval impossible. The assumption of a normal distribution does not always yield convincing and physically consistent output uncertainty bands, in particular for measurements inherent to oscillations. In this context, a new method has been proposed, which enables the generation of reasonable pseudo-samples without additional CFD simulations and the derivation of 95% confidence interval through the statistical analysis on these pseudo-samples. It was assessed against the Monte Carlo sampling method with a simple test case and confirmed an improved prediction. This method has been applied to the large scale application-oriented validation case THAI-TH32 in this work, in order to assess the impact of input uncertainties on the CFD results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549324006605/pdfft?md5=bd613eb8d09326f56106a6885c26d27b&pid=1-s2.0-S0029549324006605-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An efficient method for input uncertainty propagation in CFD and the application to buoyancy-driven flows\",\"authors\":\"Ruiyun Ji ,&nbsp;Stephan Kelm ,&nbsp;Markus Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Severe accident scenarios address the release of large amounts of hydrogen and steam to the containment. The formation of a flammable gas cloud could lead to a combustion and even failure of containment structures. In order to support the hydrogen mitigation method development, a detailed understanding of the gas transport and mixing process is crucial. Efforts in terms of numerical simulations such as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models have been made, which allow to investigate the complex 3D gas mixing process. One of the uncertainty sources that challenge the reliability of CFD validation results is the input uncertainty. It was assessed efficiently using the deterministic sampling method, which requires e.g., in the present case only eight binary samples for seven uncertain input parameters. However, the lean number of samples makes the direct derivation of a probability density function as well as a 95% confidence interval impossible. The assumption of a normal distribution does not always yield convincing and physically consistent output uncertainty bands, in particular for measurements inherent to oscillations. In this context, a new method has been proposed, which enables the generation of reasonable pseudo-samples without additional CFD simulations and the derivation of 95% confidence interval through the statistical analysis on these pseudo-samples. It was assessed against the Monte Carlo sampling method with a simple test case and confirmed an improved prediction. This method has been applied to the large scale application-oriented validation case THAI-TH32 in this work, in order to assess the impact of input uncertainties on the CFD results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549324006605/pdfft?md5=bd613eb8d09326f56106a6885c26d27b&pid=1-s2.0-S0029549324006605-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549324006605\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549324006605","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

严重事故情景涉及向安全壳释放大量氢气和蒸汽。可燃气体云的形成可能导致燃烧,甚至安全壳结构失效。为了支持氢气缓解方法的开发,详细了解气体输送和混合过程至关重要。计算流体动力学(CFD)模型等数值模拟技术的应用,可以研究复杂的三维气体混合过程。输入不确定性是影响 CFD 验证结果可靠性的不确定因素之一。使用确定性采样方法对其进行了有效评估,例如,在本案例中,只需要对 7 个不确定输入参数进行 8 次二进制采样。然而,由于样本数量较少,无法直接推导出概率密度函数以及 95% 的置信区间。正态分布假设并不总能产生令人信服且物理上一致的输出不确定性带,特别是对于振荡固有的测量。在这种情况下,我们提出了一种新方法,无需额外的 CFD 模拟就能生成合理的伪样本,并通过对这些伪样本的统计分析推导出 95% 的置信区间。该方法通过一个简单的测试案例与蒙特卡洛取样方法进行了对比评估,结果表明预测结果有所改善。在这项工作中,该方法被应用于以应用为导向的大型验证案例 THAI-TH32,以评估输入不确定性对 CFD 结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An efficient method for input uncertainty propagation in CFD and the application to buoyancy-driven flows

Severe accident scenarios address the release of large amounts of hydrogen and steam to the containment. The formation of a flammable gas cloud could lead to a combustion and even failure of containment structures. In order to support the hydrogen mitigation method development, a detailed understanding of the gas transport and mixing process is crucial. Efforts in terms of numerical simulations such as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models have been made, which allow to investigate the complex 3D gas mixing process. One of the uncertainty sources that challenge the reliability of CFD validation results is the input uncertainty. It was assessed efficiently using the deterministic sampling method, which requires e.g., in the present case only eight binary samples for seven uncertain input parameters. However, the lean number of samples makes the direct derivation of a probability density function as well as a 95% confidence interval impossible. The assumption of a normal distribution does not always yield convincing and physically consistent output uncertainty bands, in particular for measurements inherent to oscillations. In this context, a new method has been proposed, which enables the generation of reasonable pseudo-samples without additional CFD simulations and the derivation of 95% confidence interval through the statistical analysis on these pseudo-samples. It was assessed against the Monte Carlo sampling method with a simple test case and confirmed an improved prediction. This method has been applied to the large scale application-oriented validation case THAI-TH32 in this work, in order to assess the impact of input uncertainties on the CFD results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Prevalence and predictors of hand hygiene compliance in clinical, surgical and intensive care unit wards: results of a second cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1