Yu Li , Hongliang Fang , Yao Wang , Sijia Li , Tian Ma , Yunjia Wu , Hao Tang
{"title":"验证由 GEDI 导出的选定林地垂直冠层覆盖剖面产品","authors":"Yu Li , Hongliang Fang , Yao Wang , Sijia Li , Tian Ma , Yunjia Wu , Hao Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Canopy cover (CC) quantifies the proportion of canopy materials projected vertically onto the ground surface. CC is a crucial canopy structural variable and is commonly used in many ecological and climatic models. The vertical CC profile product is currently available from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI). However, detailed information about the accuracy and uncertainty of the GEDI vertical CC profile product remains limited. The objective of this study is to validate the GEDI CC product over selected forest sites using reference values derived from digital hemispherical photography (DHP), airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds, and simulated waveforms. The accuracy of CC was quantified and analyzed regarding GEDI observation conditions, waveform processing, and estimation methods. The results show that the GEDI total CC correlates well with those estimated from DHP, ALS, and simulated waveform data (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.65, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively) but is systematically underestimated (bias = −0.05, −0.11, and −0.07, respectively) based on reference data. Compared with the ALS-estimated CC, needleleaf forest shows the highest correlation for vertical CC (r<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.65) and shrubland shows the lowest bias for total CC (bias = −0.13). The mean absolute error (MAE) of the GEDI CC decreases from 0.15 to 0.09 as the estimation height increases from ground to 35 m. The GEDI total CCs derived from the waveform interpretation algorithms A2 and A6 display the highest r<sup>2</sup> (≥ 0.6) and smallest RMSE (≤ 0.23) compared to those of the other algorithms. The CC accuracy increases with beam sensitivity and decreases with increasing canopy cover. The GEDI CC was improved at moderate CC values using a canopy-to-ground backscattering coefficient ratio (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>v</mi></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>g</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>) determined with the regression method. The partial difference between GEDI CC and ALS CC is attributed to definitional discrepancies. Further improvement of the CC algorithm can be made by using vegetation-specific waveform processing algorithms and realistic <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>v</mi></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>g</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100158"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000427/pdfft?md5=3e507f3a7fd1dc415673a49b89eef211&pid=1-s2.0-S2666017224000427-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the vertical canopy cover profile products derived from GEDI over selected forest sites\",\"authors\":\"Yu Li , Hongliang Fang , Yao Wang , Sijia Li , Tian Ma , Yunjia Wu , Hao Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Canopy cover (CC) quantifies the proportion of canopy materials projected vertically onto the ground surface. CC is a crucial canopy structural variable and is commonly used in many ecological and climatic models. The vertical CC profile product is currently available from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI). However, detailed information about the accuracy and uncertainty of the GEDI vertical CC profile product remains limited. The objective of this study is to validate the GEDI CC product over selected forest sites using reference values derived from digital hemispherical photography (DHP), airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds, and simulated waveforms. The accuracy of CC was quantified and analyzed regarding GEDI observation conditions, waveform processing, and estimation methods. The results show that the GEDI total CC correlates well with those estimated from DHP, ALS, and simulated waveform data (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.65, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively) but is systematically underestimated (bias = −0.05, −0.11, and −0.07, respectively) based on reference data. Compared with the ALS-estimated CC, needleleaf forest shows the highest correlation for vertical CC (r<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.65) and shrubland shows the lowest bias for total CC (bias = −0.13). The mean absolute error (MAE) of the GEDI CC decreases from 0.15 to 0.09 as the estimation height increases from ground to 35 m. The GEDI total CCs derived from the waveform interpretation algorithms A2 and A6 display the highest r<sup>2</sup> (≥ 0.6) and smallest RMSE (≤ 0.23) compared to those of the other algorithms. The CC accuracy increases with beam sensitivity and decreases with increasing canopy cover. The GEDI CC was improved at moderate CC values using a canopy-to-ground backscattering coefficient ratio (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>v</mi></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>g</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>) determined with the regression method. The partial difference between GEDI CC and ALS CC is attributed to definitional discrepancies. Further improvement of the CC algorithm can be made by using vegetation-specific waveform processing algorithms and realistic <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>v</mi></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>g</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> values.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000427/pdfft?md5=3e507f3a7fd1dc415673a49b89eef211&pid=1-s2.0-S2666017224000427-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
树冠覆盖(CC)量化了垂直投射到地表的树冠材料比例。CC 是一个重要的冠层结构变量,常用于许多生态和气候模型。目前,全球生态系统动力学调查(GEDI)提供了垂直 CC 剖面产品。然而,有关 GEDI 垂直 CC 剖面产品的准确性和不确定性的详细信息仍然有限。本研究的目的是利用从数字半球摄影(DHP)、机载激光扫描(ALS)点云和模拟波形中获得的参考值,对 GEDI CC 产品在选定森林地点的应用进行验证。针对 GEDI 观测条件、波形处理和估算方法,对 CC 的准确性进行了量化和分析。结果表明,GEDI 总 CC 与 DHP、ALS 和模拟波形数据估算的 CC 相关性良好(r2 分别为 0.65、0.71 和 0.71),但根据参考数据,GEDI 总 CC 被系统性低估(偏差分别为 -0.05、-0.11 和 -0.07)。与 ALS 估算的 CC 相比,针叶林的垂直 CC 相关性最高(r2 ≥ 0.65),灌木林的总 CC 偏差最小(偏差 = -0.13)。波形解释算法 A2 和 A6 得出的 GEDI 总 CC 与其他算法相比,r2 最高(≥ 0.6),RMSE 最小(≤ 0.23)。CC 精确度随光束灵敏度的增加而增加,随冠层覆盖度的增加而降低。在中等 CC 值时,使用回归法确定的冠层与地面的后向散射系数比(ρv/ρg)可提高 GEDI CC 的精度。GEDI CC 和 ALS CC 之间的部分差异归因于定义上的差异。通过使用特定植被波形处理算法和真实的 ρv/ρg 值,可以进一步改进 CC 算法。
Validation of the vertical canopy cover profile products derived from GEDI over selected forest sites
Canopy cover (CC) quantifies the proportion of canopy materials projected vertically onto the ground surface. CC is a crucial canopy structural variable and is commonly used in many ecological and climatic models. The vertical CC profile product is currently available from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI). However, detailed information about the accuracy and uncertainty of the GEDI vertical CC profile product remains limited. The objective of this study is to validate the GEDI CC product over selected forest sites using reference values derived from digital hemispherical photography (DHP), airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds, and simulated waveforms. The accuracy of CC was quantified and analyzed regarding GEDI observation conditions, waveform processing, and estimation methods. The results show that the GEDI total CC correlates well with those estimated from DHP, ALS, and simulated waveform data (r2 = 0.65, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively) but is systematically underestimated (bias = −0.05, −0.11, and −0.07, respectively) based on reference data. Compared with the ALS-estimated CC, needleleaf forest shows the highest correlation for vertical CC (r2 ≥ 0.65) and shrubland shows the lowest bias for total CC (bias = −0.13). The mean absolute error (MAE) of the GEDI CC decreases from 0.15 to 0.09 as the estimation height increases from ground to 35 m. The GEDI total CCs derived from the waveform interpretation algorithms A2 and A6 display the highest r2 (≥ 0.6) and smallest RMSE (≤ 0.23) compared to those of the other algorithms. The CC accuracy increases with beam sensitivity and decreases with increasing canopy cover. The GEDI CC was improved at moderate CC values using a canopy-to-ground backscattering coefficient ratio () determined with the regression method. The partial difference between GEDI CC and ALS CC is attributed to definitional discrepancies. Further improvement of the CC algorithm can be made by using vegetation-specific waveform processing algorithms and realistic values.