护理专业学生对基本护理程序中同伴评估的看法:定性研究

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106348
Siyu Fan , Shiyu Wang , Yu Zhao , Na Zhang , Yaodi Wei , Hongyuan Liu , Zhi Li , Yunhui Yu , Yifeng Gu , Ninghan Feng , Weijuan Ye , Fengping Liu
{"title":"护理专业学生对基本护理程序中同伴评估的看法:定性研究","authors":"Siyu Fan ,&nbsp;Shiyu Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Zhao ,&nbsp;Na Zhang ,&nbsp;Yaodi Wei ,&nbsp;Hongyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Zhi Li ,&nbsp;Yunhui Yu ,&nbsp;Yifeng Gu ,&nbsp;Ninghan Feng ,&nbsp;Weijuan Ye ,&nbsp;Fengping Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Traditionally, the assessment of student nursing skills relies heavily on lecturer evaluations. However, lecturers, as the primary evaluators, may be influenced by their individual subjective preferences, experience, and knowledge background. This limitation needs thorough consideration to improve students' assessment skills and ensure that assessment tasks are more objective and accurate. Peer assessment appears to take it into account. Currently, improving the quality of peer assessment in Basic Nursing skills remains a challenge for educators.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness of peer assessment as applied to the basic nursing skills examination process and suggestions for improvement, to understand nursing students' perceptions of it, and to explore the feasibility of peer assessment as an alternative to single faculty assessment as perceived by nursing students.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Qualitative research.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Conducted in a clinical skills simulation laboratory at a university in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>23 Second-year nursing students applying peer assessment to Basic Nursing course exams.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Used face-to-face, semi-structured interviews, and thematic analysis to analyze data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three major themes and nine subthemes were identified: (1) Positive sentiments towards peer evaluation (e.g., enhancing the learning capacity, increasing emotional intelligence, and improving the objectivity and fairness of nursing skills assessment); (2) Challenges encountered in the peer evaluation process (e.g., inconsistent scoring criteria, exacerbate anxiety, and triggering team conflict); (3) Suggestions for improving peer evaluation (e.g., applying the design of peer assessment exam content, incorporation of lecturer evaluation, and refinement and materialization of marking criteria).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this study, while the positive impact is evident, the challenges faced by nursing students and future recommendations for peer assessment application are critical. This study provides valuable insights into the potential of peer assessment to enhance nursing education and provides recommendations for optimizing peer assessment strategies for meaningful integration into Nursing Education practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 106348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing students' perspectives on peer assessment in basic nursing procedures: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Siyu Fan ,&nbsp;Shiyu Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Zhao ,&nbsp;Na Zhang ,&nbsp;Yaodi Wei ,&nbsp;Hongyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Zhi Li ,&nbsp;Yunhui Yu ,&nbsp;Yifeng Gu ,&nbsp;Ninghan Feng ,&nbsp;Weijuan Ye ,&nbsp;Fengping Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Traditionally, the assessment of student nursing skills relies heavily on lecturer evaluations. However, lecturers, as the primary evaluators, may be influenced by their individual subjective preferences, experience, and knowledge background. This limitation needs thorough consideration to improve students' assessment skills and ensure that assessment tasks are more objective and accurate. Peer assessment appears to take it into account. Currently, improving the quality of peer assessment in Basic Nursing skills remains a challenge for educators.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness of peer assessment as applied to the basic nursing skills examination process and suggestions for improvement, to understand nursing students' perceptions of it, and to explore the feasibility of peer assessment as an alternative to single faculty assessment as perceived by nursing students.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Qualitative research.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Conducted in a clinical skills simulation laboratory at a university in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>23 Second-year nursing students applying peer assessment to Basic Nursing course exams.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Used face-to-face, semi-structured interviews, and thematic analysis to analyze data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three major themes and nine subthemes were identified: (1) Positive sentiments towards peer evaluation (e.g., enhancing the learning capacity, increasing emotional intelligence, and improving the objectivity and fairness of nursing skills assessment); (2) Challenges encountered in the peer evaluation process (e.g., inconsistent scoring criteria, exacerbate anxiety, and triggering team conflict); (3) Suggestions for improving peer evaluation (e.g., applying the design of peer assessment exam content, incorporation of lecturer evaluation, and refinement and materialization of marking criteria).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this study, while the positive impact is evident, the challenges faced by nursing students and future recommendations for peer assessment application are critical. This study provides valuable insights into the potential of peer assessment to enhance nursing education and provides recommendations for optimizing peer assessment strategies for meaningful integration into Nursing Education practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002582\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景传统上,对学生护理技能的评估主要依赖于讲师的评价。然而,讲师作为主要的评估者,可能会受到个人主观喜好、经验和知识背景的影响。要提高学生的评估技能,确保评估任务更加客观准确,就必须充分考虑这一局限性。同伴互评似乎考虑到了这一点。目的评估同伴互评在基础护理技能考试过程中的应用效果及改进建议,了解护生对同伴互评的看法,并探讨护生认为同伴互评替代教师单一评价的可行性。方法采用面对面、半结构式访谈和主题分析法对数据进行分析。结果确定了三大主题和九个次主题:(1) 对同伴互评的积极态度(如提高学习能力、增加情商、改善护理技能评估的客观性和公平性);(2) 在同伴互评过程中遇到的挑战(如评分标准不一致、加剧焦虑、引发团队冲突);(3) 改善同伴互评的建议(如、结论 在本研究中,虽然积极影响是显而易见的,但护生面临的挑战和未来应用互评的建议也至关重要。本研究为了解同伴互评在加强护理教育方面的潜力提供了宝贵的见解,并为优化同伴互评策略,将其有意义地融入护理教育实践提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nursing students' perspectives on peer assessment in basic nursing procedures: A qualitative study

Background

Traditionally, the assessment of student nursing skills relies heavily on lecturer evaluations. However, lecturers, as the primary evaluators, may be influenced by their individual subjective preferences, experience, and knowledge background. This limitation needs thorough consideration to improve students' assessment skills and ensure that assessment tasks are more objective and accurate. Peer assessment appears to take it into account. Currently, improving the quality of peer assessment in Basic Nursing skills remains a challenge for educators.

Aim

To assess the effectiveness of peer assessment as applied to the basic nursing skills examination process and suggestions for improvement, to understand nursing students' perceptions of it, and to explore the feasibility of peer assessment as an alternative to single faculty assessment as perceived by nursing students.

Design

Qualitative research.

Settings

Conducted in a clinical skills simulation laboratory at a university in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China.

Participants

23 Second-year nursing students applying peer assessment to Basic Nursing course exams.

Methods

Used face-to-face, semi-structured interviews, and thematic analysis to analyze data.

Results

Three major themes and nine subthemes were identified: (1) Positive sentiments towards peer evaluation (e.g., enhancing the learning capacity, increasing emotional intelligence, and improving the objectivity and fairness of nursing skills assessment); (2) Challenges encountered in the peer evaluation process (e.g., inconsistent scoring criteria, exacerbate anxiety, and triggering team conflict); (3) Suggestions for improving peer evaluation (e.g., applying the design of peer assessment exam content, incorporation of lecturer evaluation, and refinement and materialization of marking criteria).

Conclusions

In this study, while the positive impact is evident, the challenges faced by nursing students and future recommendations for peer assessment application are critical. This study provides valuable insights into the potential of peer assessment to enhance nursing education and provides recommendations for optimizing peer assessment strategies for meaningful integration into Nursing Education practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
The critical role of education in shaping nurses' attitudes and intentions towards neonatal palliative care: A network analysis Editorial Board Barriers and facilitators to the application of nurse practitioners' training pilot programs in China: A CFIR-guided descriptive qualitative study International nursing students' culture shock and academic engagement: The moderating role of resilience Factors influencing patient safety competency in baccalaureate nursing students: A descriptive cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1