捷克不同技术条件下高里程石油气汽车的比较:颗粒结合的多环芳烃

IF 3.8 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Atmospheric Environment: X Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100294
Libor Špička, Adam Poul, Jiří Huzlík, Martina Bucková, Jitka Hegrová, Roman Ličbinský
{"title":"捷克不同技术条件下高里程石油气汽车的比较:颗粒结合的多环芳烃","authors":"Libor Špička,&nbsp;Adam Poul,&nbsp;Jiří Huzlík,&nbsp;Martina Bucková,&nbsp;Jitka Hegrová,&nbsp;Roman Ličbinský","doi":"10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is represented in the literature as a transport fuel with lower regulated and non-regulated emissions compared to petrol. For the purpose of this paper, real-world emissions measurements were performed on a random sample of four commonly operated passenger vehicles with higher mileage (over 200 thousand km) and on a new one. The aim is to compare the emission factors of particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in dual-fuelled passenger cars running on LPG and petrol, or rather to compare the emission factors of the two fuel types. PAH concentrations are determined by gas chromatography based on the analysis of particles captured on a filter during isokinetic sampling of the exhaust gas during driving in real traffic. In terms of the sum of the 8 most hazardous PAHs analysed, LPG fuelling reduced the total (summary) emission factor of only two of the vehicles analysed, by 22% and 26% respectively compared to petrol. For the remaining vehicles, there was an increase in the total emission factor ranging from 4.4 to 68.8%. The results show that in terms of particle-bound PAHs, the benefit of LPG fuel in terms of vehicle emissions may not be so clear-cut in real-world tests and it depends very much on whether a suitable propulsion system is fitted to the vehicle, how it is set up and how the vehicle is serviced (i.e. the vehicle overall condition).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37150,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000613/pdfft?md5=4155e037869d567fa685bce9af3453b6&pid=1-s2.0-S2590162124000613-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of high mileage LPG cars in different technical condition in Czechia: Particle-bound PAHs\",\"authors\":\"Libor Špička,&nbsp;Adam Poul,&nbsp;Jiří Huzlík,&nbsp;Martina Bucková,&nbsp;Jitka Hegrová,&nbsp;Roman Ličbinský\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is represented in the literature as a transport fuel with lower regulated and non-regulated emissions compared to petrol. For the purpose of this paper, real-world emissions measurements were performed on a random sample of four commonly operated passenger vehicles with higher mileage (over 200 thousand km) and on a new one. The aim is to compare the emission factors of particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in dual-fuelled passenger cars running on LPG and petrol, or rather to compare the emission factors of the two fuel types. PAH concentrations are determined by gas chromatography based on the analysis of particles captured on a filter during isokinetic sampling of the exhaust gas during driving in real traffic. In terms of the sum of the 8 most hazardous PAHs analysed, LPG fuelling reduced the total (summary) emission factor of only two of the vehicles analysed, by 22% and 26% respectively compared to petrol. For the remaining vehicles, there was an increase in the total emission factor ranging from 4.4 to 68.8%. The results show that in terms of particle-bound PAHs, the benefit of LPG fuel in terms of vehicle emissions may not be so clear-cut in real-world tests and it depends very much on whether a suitable propulsion system is fitted to the vehicle, how it is set up and how the vehicle is serviced (i.e. the vehicle overall condition).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Environment: X\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000613/pdfft?md5=4155e037869d567fa685bce9af3453b6&pid=1-s2.0-S2590162124000613-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Environment: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000613\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与汽油相比,液化石油气(LPG)在文献中被认为是一种受管制和不受管制排放较低的运输燃料。本文对四辆里程数较高(超过 20 万公里)的常用乘用车和一辆新车进行了实际排放测量。目的是比较以液化石油气和汽油为双燃料的乘用车中颗粒结合的多环芳烃(PAHs)的排放因子,或者说是比较两种燃料的排放因子。多环芳烃的浓度是通过气相色谱法测定的,其依据是在实际交通行驶过程中对废气进行等速采样时在过滤器上捕获的颗粒分析。就所分析的 8 种最有害的多环芳烃的总和而言,在所分析的车辆中,只有两辆车的总排放系数(总和)与汽油相比分别降低了 22% 和 26%。其余车辆的总排放系数增加了 4.4% 至 68.8%。结果表明,就颗粒状多环芳烃而言,在实际测试中,石油气燃料对车辆排放的好处可能并不那么明显,这在很大程度上取决于车辆是否安装了合适的推进系统、系统的设置方式以及车辆的维修方式(即车辆的整体状况)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of high mileage LPG cars in different technical condition in Czechia: Particle-bound PAHs

Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is represented in the literature as a transport fuel with lower regulated and non-regulated emissions compared to petrol. For the purpose of this paper, real-world emissions measurements were performed on a random sample of four commonly operated passenger vehicles with higher mileage (over 200 thousand km) and on a new one. The aim is to compare the emission factors of particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in dual-fuelled passenger cars running on LPG and petrol, or rather to compare the emission factors of the two fuel types. PAH concentrations are determined by gas chromatography based on the analysis of particles captured on a filter during isokinetic sampling of the exhaust gas during driving in real traffic. In terms of the sum of the 8 most hazardous PAHs analysed, LPG fuelling reduced the total (summary) emission factor of only two of the vehicles analysed, by 22% and 26% respectively compared to petrol. For the remaining vehicles, there was an increase in the total emission factor ranging from 4.4 to 68.8%. The results show that in terms of particle-bound PAHs, the benefit of LPG fuel in terms of vehicle emissions may not be so clear-cut in real-world tests and it depends very much on whether a suitable propulsion system is fitted to the vehicle, how it is set up and how the vehicle is serviced (i.e. the vehicle overall condition).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment: X
Atmospheric Environment: X Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quantification of braking particles emission by PIV analysis — Application on railway Emission location affects impacts on atmosphere and climate from alternative fuels for Norwegian domestic aviation Variability of aerosol particle concentrations from tyre and brake wear emissions in an urban area Detection and analysis of ship emissions using single-particle mass spectrometry: A land-based field study in the port of rostock, Germany Comparison of global air pollution impacts across horizontal resolutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1