对旨在改善儿童、青少年和成人情绪调节的干预措施进行系统性审查

Deborah Lancastle , Nyle H. Davies , Shelley Gait , Andrea Gray , Bev John , Alexis Jones , Taf Kunorubwe , Josh Molina , Gareth Roderique-Davies , Philip Tyson
{"title":"对旨在改善儿童、青少年和成人情绪调节的干预措施进行系统性审查","authors":"Deborah Lancastle ,&nbsp;Nyle H. Davies ,&nbsp;Shelley Gait ,&nbsp;Andrea Gray ,&nbsp;Bev John ,&nbsp;Alexis Jones ,&nbsp;Taf Kunorubwe ,&nbsp;Josh Molina ,&nbsp;Gareth Roderique-Davies ,&nbsp;Philip Tyson","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2024.100505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are a wide range of interventions designed to target emotional regulation, but there has yet to be a holistic examination of their comparable effectiveness. The aim of this review was to map the landscape of interventions targeting emotional regulation difficulties and identify their effectiveness and the methodologies employed. Controlled studies examining the impact of interventions targeting emotion regulation in children and adults were included in the review. This review demonstrated that there was considerable heterogeneity in the conceptualisation of emotional regulation, the characteristics and mental health problems of the participants, the measures used, and the duration of follow-up assessment (where one was reported). In addition, the emotional regulation interventions used in the studies were adapted in many cases. Together, this heterogeneity makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the specific circumstances where emotional regulation interventions will be more effective than alternatives and precluded a meta-analysis of the included papers. Clinicians and researchers should examine the relevant literature closely when selecting interventions and measures for research and practice to ensure that these are appropriate for the aims and intended outcomes of their work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"34 3","pages":"Article 100505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979124000234/pdfft?md5=5f2c8d02e6d5ecf743540b27e32eb048&pid=1-s2.0-S2589979124000234-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of interventions aimed at improving emotional regulation in children, adolescents, and adults\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Lancastle ,&nbsp;Nyle H. Davies ,&nbsp;Shelley Gait ,&nbsp;Andrea Gray ,&nbsp;Bev John ,&nbsp;Alexis Jones ,&nbsp;Taf Kunorubwe ,&nbsp;Josh Molina ,&nbsp;Gareth Roderique-Davies ,&nbsp;Philip Tyson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbct.2024.100505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There are a wide range of interventions designed to target emotional regulation, but there has yet to be a holistic examination of their comparable effectiveness. The aim of this review was to map the landscape of interventions targeting emotional regulation difficulties and identify their effectiveness and the methodologies employed. Controlled studies examining the impact of interventions targeting emotion regulation in children and adults were included in the review. This review demonstrated that there was considerable heterogeneity in the conceptualisation of emotional regulation, the characteristics and mental health problems of the participants, the measures used, and the duration of follow-up assessment (where one was reported). In addition, the emotional regulation interventions used in the studies were adapted in many cases. Together, this heterogeneity makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the specific circumstances where emotional regulation interventions will be more effective than alternatives and precluded a meta-analysis of the included papers. Clinicians and researchers should examine the relevant literature closely when selecting interventions and measures for research and practice to ensure that these are appropriate for the aims and intended outcomes of their work.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979124000234/pdfft?md5=5f2c8d02e6d5ecf743540b27e32eb048&pid=1-s2.0-S2589979124000234-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979124000234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979124000234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对情绪调节的干预措施种类繁多,但尚未对其可比有效性进行全面研究。本综述旨在描绘针对情绪调节困难的干预措施的全貌,并确定其有效性和采用的方法。本综述纳入了针对儿童和成人情绪调节干预效果的对照研究。综述结果表明,情绪调节的概念、参与者的特征和心理健康问题、所使用的测量方法以及后续评估的持续时间(如有报告)都存在很大的异质性。此外,在许多情况下,研究中使用的情绪调节干预措施都是经过调整的。总之,这种异质性使得我们很难就情绪调节干预在哪些具体情况下会比其他方法更有效得出确切的结论,也排除了对纳入的论文进行荟萃分析的可能性。临床医生和研究人员在为研究和实践选择干预措施和测量方法时,应仔细研究相关文献,以确保这些措施和方法适合其工作的目标和预期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of interventions aimed at improving emotional regulation in children, adolescents, and adults

There are a wide range of interventions designed to target emotional regulation, but there has yet to be a holistic examination of their comparable effectiveness. The aim of this review was to map the landscape of interventions targeting emotional regulation difficulties and identify their effectiveness and the methodologies employed. Controlled studies examining the impact of interventions targeting emotion regulation in children and adults were included in the review. This review demonstrated that there was considerable heterogeneity in the conceptualisation of emotional regulation, the characteristics and mental health problems of the participants, the measures used, and the duration of follow-up assessment (where one was reported). In addition, the emotional regulation interventions used in the studies were adapted in many cases. Together, this heterogeneity makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the specific circumstances where emotional regulation interventions will be more effective than alternatives and precluded a meta-analysis of the included papers. Clinicians and researchers should examine the relevant literature closely when selecting interventions and measures for research and practice to ensure that these are appropriate for the aims and intended outcomes of their work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of online mental health education on occupational burnout among medical staff Analyzing data in single-case experimental designs: Objectives and available software options The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy in mental health problems of children and adolescents in child protection system: A meta-analysis Assessing user acceptance of a mental health app & its impact on depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder related knowledge: A mixed method experimental study Morphological changes and body representation: A study of the link between weight cycling and body schema disturbances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1