切割不同类型氧化锆时,不同切割工具和转速对发热量和切割效率的影响

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106715
{"title":"切割不同类型氧化锆时,不同切割工具和转速对发热量和切割效率的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temperature generated on the intaglio surface and efficiency when cutting different types of zirconia with different rotary instruments and rotational speeds.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A conventional diamond rotary instrument (Brasseler, grit size 107 μm) and special diamond rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia (4 ZR, Brasseler, grit size 126 μm) were tested on 3Y-TZP and 4Y-TZP zirconia with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm and 200,000 rpm. Zirconia specimens were cut under water cooling (110 mL/min) in a custom-made holder attached to a universal testing machine. The temperature was recorded with infrared sensors pointing at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A rotation speed of 200,000 rpm resulted in significantly shorter cutting times, but also in significantly higher temperatures at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens compared with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm. Significantly shorter cutting times were observed for the conventional diamond rotary instrument than for the special rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia. Using the special rotary instrument, significantly longer cutting times were recorded for 3Y-TZP than for 4Y-TZP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A conventional diamond rotary instrument was more efficient than a special rotary instrument. However, to avoid high temperatures when cutting zirconia clinically, a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm is recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003473/pdfft?md5=78e1619198ee9525b027fbaf138a077f&pid=1-s2.0-S1751616124003473-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of different cutting instruments and rotational speeds on heat generation and cutting efficiency when sectioning different types of zirconia\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temperature generated on the intaglio surface and efficiency when cutting different types of zirconia with different rotary instruments and rotational speeds.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A conventional diamond rotary instrument (Brasseler, grit size 107 μm) and special diamond rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia (4 ZR, Brasseler, grit size 126 μm) were tested on 3Y-TZP and 4Y-TZP zirconia with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm and 200,000 rpm. Zirconia specimens were cut under water cooling (110 mL/min) in a custom-made holder attached to a universal testing machine. The temperature was recorded with infrared sensors pointing at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A rotation speed of 200,000 rpm resulted in significantly shorter cutting times, but also in significantly higher temperatures at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens compared with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm. Significantly shorter cutting times were observed for the conventional diamond rotary instrument than for the special rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia. Using the special rotary instrument, significantly longer cutting times were recorded for 3Y-TZP than for 4Y-TZP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A conventional diamond rotary instrument was more efficient than a special rotary instrument. However, to avoid high temperatures when cutting zirconia clinically, a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm is recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003473/pdfft?md5=78e1619198ee9525b027fbaf138a077f&pid=1-s2.0-S1751616124003473-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003473\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 在 3Y-TZP 和 4Y-TZP 氧化锆上测试了传统的金刚石旋转器械(Brasseler,粒度 107 μm)和市场上销售的切割氧化锆的特殊金刚石旋转器械(4 ZR,Brasseler,粒度 126 μm),旋转速度分别为 100,000 rpm 和 200,000 rpm。氧化锆试样是在水冷(110 mL/min)条件下切割的,切割过程是在连接到万能试验机的特制支架上进行的。结果 与 100,000 rpm 的转速相比,200,000 rpm 的转速明显缩短了切割时间,但氧化锆试样凹面的温度也明显升高。传统金刚石旋转仪器的切割时间明显短于市场上销售的切割氧化锆的特殊旋转仪器。结论 传统金刚石旋转仪器比特殊旋转仪器更有效。但在临床上切割氧化锆时,为避免高温,建议转速为 100,000 rpm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of different cutting instruments and rotational speeds on heat generation and cutting efficiency when sectioning different types of zirconia

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temperature generated on the intaglio surface and efficiency when cutting different types of zirconia with different rotary instruments and rotational speeds.

Methods

A conventional diamond rotary instrument (Brasseler, grit size 107 μm) and special diamond rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia (4 ZR, Brasseler, grit size 126 μm) were tested on 3Y-TZP and 4Y-TZP zirconia with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm and 200,000 rpm. Zirconia specimens were cut under water cooling (110 mL/min) in a custom-made holder attached to a universal testing machine. The temperature was recorded with infrared sensors pointing at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens.

Results

A rotation speed of 200,000 rpm resulted in significantly shorter cutting times, but also in significantly higher temperatures at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens compared with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm. Significantly shorter cutting times were observed for the conventional diamond rotary instrument than for the special rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia. Using the special rotary instrument, significantly longer cutting times were recorded for 3Y-TZP than for 4Y-TZP.

Conclusions

A conventional diamond rotary instrument was more efficient than a special rotary instrument. However, to avoid high temperatures when cutting zirconia clinically, a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
505
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials. The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.
期刊最新文献
One-step synthesis of a piezoelectric hybrid BNNT/BaTiO3 composite and its application in bone tissue engineering Validation of finite-element-simulated orthodontic forces produced by thermoplastic aligners: Effect of aligner geometry and creep The influence of lumbar vertebra and cage related factors on cage-endplate contact after lumbar interbody fusion: An in-vitro experimental study A benchmark of muscle models to length changes great and small Designs and mechanical responses of 3D-printed Ti6Al4V porous structures based on triply periodic minimal surfaces with different iso-values
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1