紫杉醇和卡铂与博来霉素、依托泊苷和顺铂治疗新诊断和复发的切莫纳间质卵巢肿瘤的随机 II 期试验结果:NRG 肿瘤学/妇科肿瘤学小组研究14

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.09.002
{"title":"紫杉醇和卡铂与博来霉素、依托泊苷和顺铂治疗新诊断和复发的切莫纳间质卵巢肿瘤的随机 II 期试验结果:NRG 肿瘤学/妇科肿瘤学小组研究14","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) compared to bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for treatment of newly diagnosed Stage IIA-IV or recurrent chemotherapy-naive ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This phase II noninferiority trial randomly assigned patients to receive PC (6 cycles P 175 mg/m2 and C AUC = 6 IV every 3 weeks), or BEP (4 cycles B 20 units/m2 IV push day 1, E 75 mg/m2 IV days 1–5, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 IV days 1–5 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression- free survival (PFS). This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT01042522</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At the interim analysis, 63 patients (31 PC and 32 B.P. had accrued between Feb 8, 2010 and Apr 30, 2020. Median age was 48 years. 87% had granulosa cell tumors. 37% had measurable disease. The DSMB closed accrual early for futility of PC arm. The futility analysis was supported by an estimated HR = 1.11 [95% CI: 0.57 to 2.13] which exceeded the pre-determined threshold for non-inferiority (1.10). Median PFS was 27.7 months [11.2 to 41.0] for PC and 19.7 months for BEP [95% CI: 10.4–52.7]. PC patients had fewer grade 3 or higher adverse events (PC 77% vs BEP 90%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study met its pre-specified criterion for stopping early for futility and so failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of PC versus BEP in ovarian SCSTs, in a non-inferiority test with a hazard ratio margin of 1.1. Both PC and BEP may be considered in patients with advanced/recurrent SCST.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of a randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin versus bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin for newly diagnosed and recurrent Chemonaive stromal ovarian tumors: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study14\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) compared to bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for treatment of newly diagnosed Stage IIA-IV or recurrent chemotherapy-naive ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This phase II noninferiority trial randomly assigned patients to receive PC (6 cycles P 175 mg/m2 and C AUC = 6 IV every 3 weeks), or BEP (4 cycles B 20 units/m2 IV push day 1, E 75 mg/m2 IV days 1–5, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 IV days 1–5 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression- free survival (PFS). This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT01042522</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At the interim analysis, 63 patients (31 PC and 32 B.P. had accrued between Feb 8, 2010 and Apr 30, 2020. Median age was 48 years. 87% had granulosa cell tumors. 37% had measurable disease. The DSMB closed accrual early for futility of PC arm. The futility analysis was supported by an estimated HR = 1.11 [95% CI: 0.57 to 2.13] which exceeded the pre-determined threshold for non-inferiority (1.10). Median PFS was 27.7 months [11.2 to 41.0] for PC and 19.7 months for BEP [95% CI: 10.4–52.7]. PC patients had fewer grade 3 or higher adverse events (PC 77% vs BEP 90%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study met its pre-specified criterion for stopping early for futility and so failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of PC versus BEP in ovarian SCSTs, in a non-inferiority test with a hazard ratio margin of 1.1. Both PC and BEP may be considered in patients with advanced/recurrent SCST.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825824011090\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825824011090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估紫杉醇和卡铂(PC)与博来霉素、依托泊苷和顺铂(BEP)治疗新诊断的 IIA-IV 期或复发性化疗无效卵巢性索间质肿瘤(SCST)的疗效和毒性。方法这项 II 期非劣效试验随机分配患者接受 PC(6 个周期,P 175 mg/m2 和 C AUC = 6 IV,每 3 周一次)或 BEP(4 个周期,B 20 单位/m2 IV 推注第 1 天,E 75 mg/m2 IV 第 1-5 天,顺铂 20 mg/m2 IV 第 1-5 天,每 3 周一次)治疗。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 登记,编号为 NCT01042522。结果在中期分析时,共有 63 名患者(31 名 PC 和 32 名 B.P.)在 2010 年 2 月 8 日至 2020 年 4 月 30 日期间入组。中位年龄为 48 岁。87%的患者患有颗粒细胞肿瘤。37%患有可测量的疾病。DSMB 因 PC 治疗组无效而提前结束了应计制。无效性分析结果显示,估计 HR = 1.11 [95% CI:0.57 至 2.13],超过了预先确定的非劣效性阈值(1.10)。PC和BEP的中位PFS分别为27.7个月[11.2-41.0]和19.7个月[95% CI:10.4-52.7]。PC患者发生3级或以上不良事件的比例较低(PC 77% vs BEP 90%)。结论该研究达到了预先指定的因无效而提前终止的标准,因此未能证明PC与BEP在卵巢SCST中的非劣效性,非劣效性试验的危险比值为1.1。对于晚期/复发性 SCST 患者,PC 和 BEP 均可考虑使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Results of a randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin versus bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin for newly diagnosed and recurrent Chemonaive stromal ovarian tumors: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study14

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) compared to bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for treatment of newly diagnosed Stage IIA-IV or recurrent chemotherapy-naive ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST).

Methods

This phase II noninferiority trial randomly assigned patients to receive PC (6 cycles P 175 mg/m2 and C AUC = 6 IV every 3 weeks), or BEP (4 cycles B 20 units/m2 IV push day 1, E 75 mg/m2 IV days 1–5, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 IV days 1–5 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression- free survival (PFS). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01042522.

Results

At the interim analysis, 63 patients (31 PC and 32 B.P. had accrued between Feb 8, 2010 and Apr 30, 2020. Median age was 48 years. 87% had granulosa cell tumors. 37% had measurable disease. The DSMB closed accrual early for futility of PC arm. The futility analysis was supported by an estimated HR = 1.11 [95% CI: 0.57 to 2.13] which exceeded the pre-determined threshold for non-inferiority (1.10). Median PFS was 27.7 months [11.2 to 41.0] for PC and 19.7 months for BEP [95% CI: 10.4–52.7]. PC patients had fewer grade 3 or higher adverse events (PC 77% vs BEP 90%).

Conclusions

The study met its pre-specified criterion for stopping early for futility and so failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of PC versus BEP in ovarian SCSTs, in a non-inferiority test with a hazard ratio margin of 1.1. Both PC and BEP may be considered in patients with advanced/recurrent SCST.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic oncology
Gynecologic oncology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.40%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published. Research Areas Include: • Cell and molecular biology • Chemotherapy • Cytology • Endocrinology • Epidemiology • Genetics • Gynecologic surgery • Immunology • Pathology • Radiotherapy
期刊最新文献
Evolutionary pathways in early-stage, non-myoinvasive endometrioid endometrial cancers of no specific molecular profile What happens after menopause? (WHAM): Impact of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy on depressive and anxiety symptoms at 24 months KRAS mutations in endometrial cancers: Possible prognostic and treatment implications Too much of a good thing? Projecting the need for gynecologic oncologists over the next 20 years Disparities in ovarian cancer survival among ethnic Asian American populations, 2006–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1