{"title":"紫杉醇和卡铂与博来霉素、依托泊苷和顺铂治疗新诊断和复发的切莫纳间质卵巢肿瘤的随机 II 期试验结果:NRG 肿瘤学/妇科肿瘤学小组研究14","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) compared to bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for treatment of newly diagnosed Stage IIA-IV or recurrent chemotherapy-naive ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This phase II noninferiority trial randomly assigned patients to receive PC (6 cycles P 175 mg/m2 and C AUC = 6 IV every 3 weeks), or BEP (4 cycles B 20 units/m2 IV push day 1, E 75 mg/m2 IV days 1–5, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 IV days 1–5 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression- free survival (PFS). This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT01042522</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At the interim analysis, 63 patients (31 PC and 32 B.P. had accrued between Feb 8, 2010 and Apr 30, 2020. Median age was 48 years. 87% had granulosa cell tumors. 37% had measurable disease. The DSMB closed accrual early for futility of PC arm. The futility analysis was supported by an estimated HR = 1.11 [95% CI: 0.57 to 2.13] which exceeded the pre-determined threshold for non-inferiority (1.10). Median PFS was 27.7 months [11.2 to 41.0] for PC and 19.7 months for BEP [95% CI: 10.4–52.7]. PC patients had fewer grade 3 or higher adverse events (PC 77% vs BEP 90%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study met its pre-specified criterion for stopping early for futility and so failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of PC versus BEP in ovarian SCSTs, in a non-inferiority test with a hazard ratio margin of 1.1. Both PC and BEP may be considered in patients with advanced/recurrent SCST.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of a randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin versus bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin for newly diagnosed and recurrent Chemonaive stromal ovarian tumors: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study14\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) compared to bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for treatment of newly diagnosed Stage IIA-IV or recurrent chemotherapy-naive ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This phase II noninferiority trial randomly assigned patients to receive PC (6 cycles P 175 mg/m2 and C AUC = 6 IV every 3 weeks), or BEP (4 cycles B 20 units/m2 IV push day 1, E 75 mg/m2 IV days 1–5, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 IV days 1–5 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression- free survival (PFS). This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT01042522</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At the interim analysis, 63 patients (31 PC and 32 B.P. had accrued between Feb 8, 2010 and Apr 30, 2020. Median age was 48 years. 87% had granulosa cell tumors. 37% had measurable disease. The DSMB closed accrual early for futility of PC arm. The futility analysis was supported by an estimated HR = 1.11 [95% CI: 0.57 to 2.13] which exceeded the pre-determined threshold for non-inferiority (1.10). Median PFS was 27.7 months [11.2 to 41.0] for PC and 19.7 months for BEP [95% CI: 10.4–52.7]. PC patients had fewer grade 3 or higher adverse events (PC 77% vs BEP 90%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study met its pre-specified criterion for stopping early for futility and so failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of PC versus BEP in ovarian SCSTs, in a non-inferiority test with a hazard ratio margin of 1.1. Both PC and BEP may be considered in patients with advanced/recurrent SCST.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825824011090\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825824011090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估紫杉醇和卡铂(PC)与博来霉素、依托泊苷和顺铂(BEP)治疗新诊断的 IIA-IV 期或复发性化疗无效卵巢性索间质肿瘤(SCST)的疗效和毒性。方法这项 II 期非劣效试验随机分配患者接受 PC(6 个周期,P 175 mg/m2 和 C AUC = 6 IV,每 3 周一次)或 BEP(4 个周期,B 20 单位/m2 IV 推注第 1 天,E 75 mg/m2 IV 第 1-5 天,顺铂 20 mg/m2 IV 第 1-5 天,每 3 周一次)治疗。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 登记,编号为 NCT01042522。结果在中期分析时,共有 63 名患者(31 名 PC 和 32 名 B.P.)在 2010 年 2 月 8 日至 2020 年 4 月 30 日期间入组。中位年龄为 48 岁。87%的患者患有颗粒细胞肿瘤。37%患有可测量的疾病。DSMB 因 PC 治疗组无效而提前结束了应计制。无效性分析结果显示,估计 HR = 1.11 [95% CI:0.57 至 2.13],超过了预先确定的非劣效性阈值(1.10)。PC和BEP的中位PFS分别为27.7个月[11.2-41.0]和19.7个月[95% CI:10.4-52.7]。PC患者发生3级或以上不良事件的比例较低(PC 77% vs BEP 90%)。结论该研究达到了预先指定的因无效而提前终止的标准,因此未能证明PC与BEP在卵巢SCST中的非劣效性,非劣效性试验的危险比值为1.1。对于晚期/复发性 SCST 患者,PC 和 BEP 均可考虑使用。
Results of a randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin versus bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin for newly diagnosed and recurrent Chemonaive stromal ovarian tumors: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study14
Objectives
To assess the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) compared to bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for treatment of newly diagnosed Stage IIA-IV or recurrent chemotherapy-naive ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST).
Methods
This phase II noninferiority trial randomly assigned patients to receive PC (6 cycles P 175 mg/m2 and C AUC = 6 IV every 3 weeks), or BEP (4 cycles B 20 units/m2 IV push day 1, E 75 mg/m2 IV days 1–5, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 IV days 1–5 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression- free survival (PFS). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01042522.
Results
At the interim analysis, 63 patients (31 PC and 32 B.P. had accrued between Feb 8, 2010 and Apr 30, 2020. Median age was 48 years. 87% had granulosa cell tumors. 37% had measurable disease. The DSMB closed accrual early for futility of PC arm. The futility analysis was supported by an estimated HR = 1.11 [95% CI: 0.57 to 2.13] which exceeded the pre-determined threshold for non-inferiority (1.10). Median PFS was 27.7 months [11.2 to 41.0] for PC and 19.7 months for BEP [95% CI: 10.4–52.7]. PC patients had fewer grade 3 or higher adverse events (PC 77% vs BEP 90%).
Conclusions
The study met its pre-specified criterion for stopping early for futility and so failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of PC versus BEP in ovarian SCSTs, in a non-inferiority test with a hazard ratio margin of 1.1. Both PC and BEP may be considered in patients with advanced/recurrent SCST.
期刊介绍:
Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published.
Research Areas Include:
• Cell and molecular biology
• Chemotherapy
• Cytology
• Endocrinology
• Epidemiology
• Genetics
• Gynecologic surgery
• Immunology
• Pathology
• Radiotherapy