通过患者门户网站提供电子手术同意书,提高围手术期效率

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY JAMA surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3581
Karen Trang, Hannah C. Decker, Andrew Gonzalez, Logan Pierce, Amy M. Shui, Genevieve B. Melton-Meaux, Elizabeth C. Wick
{"title":"通过患者门户网站提供电子手术同意书,提高围手术期效率","authors":"Karen Trang, Hannah C. Decker, Andrew Gonzalez, Logan Pierce, Amy M. Shui, Genevieve B. Melton-Meaux, Elizabeth C. Wick","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceMany health systems use electronic consent (eConsent) for surgery, but few have used surgical consent functionality in the patient portal (PP). Incorporating the PP into the consent process could potentially improve efficiency by letting patients independently review and sign their eConsent before the day of surgery.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of eConsent delivery via the PP with operational efficiency and patient engagement.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis mixed-methods study consisted of a retrospective quantitative analysis (February 8 to August 8, 2023) and a qualitative analysis of semistructured patient interviews (December 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024) of adult surgical patients in a health system that implemented surgical eConsent. Statistical analysis was performed between September 1, 2023, and June 6, 2024.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPatient demographics, efficiency metrics (first-start case delays), and PP access logs were analyzed from electronic health records. Qualitative outcomes included thematic analysis from semistructured patient interviews.ResultsIn the PP-eligible cohort of 7672 unique patients, 8478 surgical eConsents were generated (median [IQR] age, 58 [43-70] years; 4611 [54.4%] women), of which 5318 (62.7%) were signed on hospital iPads and 3160 (37.3%) through the PP. For all adult patients who signed an eConsent using the PP, patients waited a median (IQR) of 105 (17-528) minutes to view their eConsent after it was electronically pushed to their PP. eConsents signed on the same day of surgery were associated with more first-start delays (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.37-1.83; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). Themes that emerged from patient interviews included having a favorable experience with the PP, openness to eConsent, skimming the consent form, and the importance of the discussion with the surgeon.Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest that eConsent incorporating PP functionality may reduce surgical delays and staff burden by allowing patients to review and sign before the day of surgery. Most patients spent minimal time engaging with their consent form, emphasizing the importance of surgeon-patient trust and an informed consent discussion. Additional studies are needed to understand patient perceptions of eConsent, PP, and barriers to increased uptake.","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Surgical Consent Delivery Via Patient Portal to Improve Perioperative Efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Karen Trang, Hannah C. Decker, Andrew Gonzalez, Logan Pierce, Amy M. Shui, Genevieve B. Melton-Meaux, Elizabeth C. Wick\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ImportanceMany health systems use electronic consent (eConsent) for surgery, but few have used surgical consent functionality in the patient portal (PP). Incorporating the PP into the consent process could potentially improve efficiency by letting patients independently review and sign their eConsent before the day of surgery.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of eConsent delivery via the PP with operational efficiency and patient engagement.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis mixed-methods study consisted of a retrospective quantitative analysis (February 8 to August 8, 2023) and a qualitative analysis of semistructured patient interviews (December 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024) of adult surgical patients in a health system that implemented surgical eConsent. Statistical analysis was performed between September 1, 2023, and June 6, 2024.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPatient demographics, efficiency metrics (first-start case delays), and PP access logs were analyzed from electronic health records. Qualitative outcomes included thematic analysis from semistructured patient interviews.ResultsIn the PP-eligible cohort of 7672 unique patients, 8478 surgical eConsents were generated (median [IQR] age, 58 [43-70] years; 4611 [54.4%] women), of which 5318 (62.7%) were signed on hospital iPads and 3160 (37.3%) through the PP. For all adult patients who signed an eConsent using the PP, patients waited a median (IQR) of 105 (17-528) minutes to view their eConsent after it was electronically pushed to their PP. eConsents signed on the same day of surgery were associated with more first-start delays (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.37-1.83; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). Themes that emerged from patient interviews included having a favorable experience with the PP, openness to eConsent, skimming the consent form, and the importance of the discussion with the surgeon.Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest that eConsent incorporating PP functionality may reduce surgical delays and staff burden by allowing patients to review and sign before the day of surgery. Most patients spent minimal time engaging with their consent form, emphasizing the importance of surgeon-patient trust and an informed consent discussion. Additional studies are needed to understand patient perceptions of eConsent, PP, and barriers to increased uptake.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3581\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3581","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性许多医疗系统在手术中使用电子同意书(eConsent),但很少有医疗系统在患者门户网站(PP)中使用手术同意书功能。这项混合方法研究包括一项回顾性定量分析(2023 年 2 月 8 日至 8 月 8 日)和一项半结构化患者访谈的定性分析(2023 年 12 月 1 日至 2024 年 1 月 31 日),访谈对象为已实施手术电子同意书的医疗系统中的成年手术患者。统计分析在 2023 年 9 月 1 日至 2024 年 6 月 6 日期间进行。主要结果和衡量标准分析了电子健康记录中的患者人口统计数据、效率指标(首次启动病例延迟)和 PP 访问日志。结果在符合参与计划资格的 7672 名患者中,共生成了 8478 份手术电子同意书(中位数[IQR]年龄 58 [43-70] 岁;女性 4611 [54.4%]),其中 5318 份(62.7%)是在医院 iPad 上签署的,3160 份(37.3%)是通过参与计划签署的。对于所有使用PP签署电子同意书的成年患者,在电子同意书被推送到PP后,患者等待查看电子同意书的中位数(IQR)为105(17-528)分钟。在手术当天签署电子同意书与更多的首次启动延迟有关(几率比为1.59;95% CI为1.37-1.83;P &amp;lt; .001)。患者访谈中出现的主题包括:对 PP 有良好的体验、对电子同意书持开放态度、略读同意书以及与外科医生讨论的重要性。大多数患者花在同意书上的时间极少,这强调了外科医生与患者之间的信任和知情同意讨论的重要性。还需要进行更多的研究,以了解患者对电子同意书、PP的看法以及提高使用率的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electronic Surgical Consent Delivery Via Patient Portal to Improve Perioperative Efficiency
ImportanceMany health systems use electronic consent (eConsent) for surgery, but few have used surgical consent functionality in the patient portal (PP). Incorporating the PP into the consent process could potentially improve efficiency by letting patients independently review and sign their eConsent before the day of surgery.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of eConsent delivery via the PP with operational efficiency and patient engagement.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis mixed-methods study consisted of a retrospective quantitative analysis (February 8 to August 8, 2023) and a qualitative analysis of semistructured patient interviews (December 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024) of adult surgical patients in a health system that implemented surgical eConsent. Statistical analysis was performed between September 1, 2023, and June 6, 2024.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPatient demographics, efficiency metrics (first-start case delays), and PP access logs were analyzed from electronic health records. Qualitative outcomes included thematic analysis from semistructured patient interviews.ResultsIn the PP-eligible cohort of 7672 unique patients, 8478 surgical eConsents were generated (median [IQR] age, 58 [43-70] years; 4611 [54.4%] women), of which 5318 (62.7%) were signed on hospital iPads and 3160 (37.3%) through the PP. For all adult patients who signed an eConsent using the PP, patients waited a median (IQR) of 105 (17-528) minutes to view their eConsent after it was electronically pushed to their PP. eConsents signed on the same day of surgery were associated with more first-start delays (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.37-1.83; P &amp;lt; .001). Themes that emerged from patient interviews included having a favorable experience with the PP, openness to eConsent, skimming the consent form, and the importance of the discussion with the surgeon.Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest that eConsent incorporating PP functionality may reduce surgical delays and staff burden by allowing patients to review and sign before the day of surgery. Most patients spent minimal time engaging with their consent form, emphasizing the importance of surgeon-patient trust and an informed consent discussion. Additional studies are needed to understand patient perceptions of eConsent, PP, and barriers to increased uptake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Electronic Surgical Consent Delivery via Patient Portal. Pain Management Details for Serratus Anterior Plane Blocks in Early Rib Fracture. Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections Ampullary Adenocarcinoma-Advancing Prognostication and Personalized Treatment. Teaching Bleeding Control and Building Trust With a Community Affected by Firearm Injuries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1