展开式案例研究与思考-朗读策略相结合对研究生临床推理和自主学习能力的影响:混合方法研究

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104132
{"title":"展开式案例研究与思考-朗读策略相结合对研究生临床推理和自主学习能力的影响:混合方法研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To conduct unfolding case studies and test their effectiveness in improving clinical reasoning, teamwork and self-directed learning among postgraduate students.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postgraduate students, as advanced nursing professionals in clinical settings, are the driving force behind the rapid development of the nursing profession. Effective clinical reasoning is a fundamental nursing skill that postgraduate students must cultivate, having a direct impact on patient health outcomes. The development and usation of unfolding case studies, which reflect the evolving conditions of patients, combined with think-aloud teaching methods, can enhance postgraduate students' clinical reasoning abilities and foster communication and self-reflection, thereby achieving this goal.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Mixed methods design.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Nurses' Clinical Reasoning Scale and the Nursing Students' Self-Directed Learning Ability Scale were used to evaluate the clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities of nursing students. A qualitative exploratory design with a think-aloud interview technique was employed to explore the clinical reasoning process of nursing students in unfolding cases. Twenty-one nursing students completed the questionnaire survey. Data analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Spearman correlations, regressions and inductive content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After implementing the case study, there was a statistically significant improvement in students' clinical reasoning, self-directed learning and teamwork abilities. Think-aloud analysis revealed that the cognitive strategies most employed by students in clinical reasoning were 'Making choices', 'Forming relationships', 'Searched for information' and 'Drawing conclusions'.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Unfolding case studies combined with think-aloud strategies provide a conducive learning environment for postgraduate students, effectively enhancing their clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of unfolding case studies combined with think-aloud strategies on the clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities of postgraduate students: A mixed methods study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To conduct unfolding case studies and test their effectiveness in improving clinical reasoning, teamwork and self-directed learning among postgraduate students.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postgraduate students, as advanced nursing professionals in clinical settings, are the driving force behind the rapid development of the nursing profession. Effective clinical reasoning is a fundamental nursing skill that postgraduate students must cultivate, having a direct impact on patient health outcomes. The development and usation of unfolding case studies, which reflect the evolving conditions of patients, combined with think-aloud teaching methods, can enhance postgraduate students' clinical reasoning abilities and foster communication and self-reflection, thereby achieving this goal.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Mixed methods design.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Nurses' Clinical Reasoning Scale and the Nursing Students' Self-Directed Learning Ability Scale were used to evaluate the clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities of nursing students. A qualitative exploratory design with a think-aloud interview technique was employed to explore the clinical reasoning process of nursing students in unfolding cases. Twenty-one nursing students completed the questionnaire survey. Data analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Spearman correlations, regressions and inductive content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After implementing the case study, there was a statistically significant improvement in students' clinical reasoning, self-directed learning and teamwork abilities. Think-aloud analysis revealed that the cognitive strategies most employed by students in clinical reasoning were 'Making choices', 'Forming relationships', 'Searched for information' and 'Drawing conclusions'.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Unfolding case studies combined with think-aloud strategies provide a conducive learning environment for postgraduate students, effectively enhancing their clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002610\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景研究生作为临床环境中的高级护理专业人员,是护理专业快速发展的推动力。有效的临床推理能力是研究生必须培养的一项基本护理技能,直接影响患者的健康结果。通过开发和使用反映患者病情变化的展开式病例研究,结合思维导图教学法,可以提高研究生的临床推理能力,促进沟通和自我反思,从而实现这一目标。设计采用混合方法设计。方法采用护士临床推理量表和护生自主学习能力量表评价护生的临床推理和自主学习能力。采用定性探索性设计和思考-朗读访谈技术,探讨护生在展开病例中的临床推理过程。21 名护生完成了问卷调查。结果实施案例研究后,学生的临床推理能力、自主学习能力和团队合作能力均有显著提高。结果实施案例教学后,学生的临床推理能力、自主学习能力和团队合作能力都有了明显的提高。思考-朗读分析显示,学生在临床推理中使用最多的认知策略是 "做出选择"、"建立关系"、"搜索信息 "和 "得出结论"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of unfolding case studies combined with think-aloud strategies on the clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities of postgraduate students: A mixed methods study

Aim

To conduct unfolding case studies and test their effectiveness in improving clinical reasoning, teamwork and self-directed learning among postgraduate students.

Background

Postgraduate students, as advanced nursing professionals in clinical settings, are the driving force behind the rapid development of the nursing profession. Effective clinical reasoning is a fundamental nursing skill that postgraduate students must cultivate, having a direct impact on patient health outcomes. The development and usation of unfolding case studies, which reflect the evolving conditions of patients, combined with think-aloud teaching methods, can enhance postgraduate students' clinical reasoning abilities and foster communication and self-reflection, thereby achieving this goal.

Design

Mixed methods design.

Methods

The Nurses' Clinical Reasoning Scale and the Nursing Students' Self-Directed Learning Ability Scale were used to evaluate the clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities of nursing students. A qualitative exploratory design with a think-aloud interview technique was employed to explore the clinical reasoning process of nursing students in unfolding cases. Twenty-one nursing students completed the questionnaire survey. Data analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Spearman correlations, regressions and inductive content analysis.

Results

After implementing the case study, there was a statistically significant improvement in students' clinical reasoning, self-directed learning and teamwork abilities. Think-aloud analysis revealed that the cognitive strategies most employed by students in clinical reasoning were 'Making choices', 'Forming relationships', 'Searched for information' and 'Drawing conclusions'.

Conclusion

Unfolding case studies combined with think-aloud strategies provide a conducive learning environment for postgraduate students, effectively enhancing their clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
“Removing the home court advantage”: A qualitative evaluation of LEGO® as an interprofessional simulation icebreaker for midwifery and medical students Does being involved in a research project enhance the postgraduate taught student experience: A qualitative research case study Investigating clinical decision-making in bleeding complications among nursing students: A longitudinal mixed-methods study Simulation as a method in a supervision course, experiences of midwives and specialist nurses: A qualitative study Characteristics of nursing educators' professional competency standards: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1