慢性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间所用药物数量与不良事件之间的关系:CLIDAS数据库分析

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS IJC Heart and Vasculature Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101507
{"title":"慢性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间所用药物数量与不良事件之间的关系:CLIDAS数据库分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of adverse events due to the higher number of drugs used. This is particularly notable in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), who are known to use a large number of drugs. Therefore, we investigated polypharmacy in patients with CCS, using CLIDAS, a multicenter database of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Method and results</h3><p>Between 2017 and 2020, 1411 CCS patients (71.5 ± 10.5 years old; 77.3 % male) were enrolled. The relationship between cardiovascular events occurring during the median follow-up of 514 days and the number of drugs at the time of PCI was investigated. The median number of drugs prescribed was nine. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, transient ischemic attack, or unstable angina, occurred in 123 patients, and all-cause mortality occurred in 68 patients. For each additional drug, the adjusted hazard ratios for MACE and all-cause mortality increased by 2.069 (p = 0.003) and 1.102 (p = 0.010). The adjusted hazard ratios for MACE and all-cause mortality were significantly higher in the group using nine or more drugs compared to the group using eight or fewer drugs (1.646 and 2.253, both p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study showed that an increase in the number of drugs used for CCS may be associated with MACE and all-cause mortality. In patients with CCS, it might be beneficial to minimize the number of medications as much as possible, while managing comorbidities and using guideline-recommended drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001738/pdfft?md5=d8dfc07ec3b9b30f6f4283b6a5e990f3&pid=1-s2.0-S2352906724001738-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between the number of drugs used during percutaneous coronary intervention and adverse events in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: Analysis of CLIDAS database\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of adverse events due to the higher number of drugs used. This is particularly notable in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), who are known to use a large number of drugs. Therefore, we investigated polypharmacy in patients with CCS, using CLIDAS, a multicenter database of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Method and results</h3><p>Between 2017 and 2020, 1411 CCS patients (71.5 ± 10.5 years old; 77.3 % male) were enrolled. The relationship between cardiovascular events occurring during the median follow-up of 514 days and the number of drugs at the time of PCI was investigated. The median number of drugs prescribed was nine. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, transient ischemic attack, or unstable angina, occurred in 123 patients, and all-cause mortality occurred in 68 patients. For each additional drug, the adjusted hazard ratios for MACE and all-cause mortality increased by 2.069 (p = 0.003) and 1.102 (p = 0.010). The adjusted hazard ratios for MACE and all-cause mortality were significantly higher in the group using nine or more drugs compared to the group using eight or fewer drugs (1.646 and 2.253, both p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study showed that an increase in the number of drugs used for CCS may be associated with MACE and all-cause mortality. In patients with CCS, it might be beneficial to minimize the number of medications as much as possible, while managing comorbidities and using guideline-recommended drugs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001738/pdfft?md5=d8dfc07ec3b9b30f6f4283b6a5e990f3&pid=1-s2.0-S2352906724001738-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景由于使用的药物较多,多药治疗会增加不良事件的风险。这一点在慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)患者中尤为明显,众所周知,这些患者会使用大量药物。因此,我们利用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的多中心数据库CLIDAS,对慢性冠状动脉综合征患者的多药使用情况进行了调查。调查了中位随访 514 天期间发生的心血管事件与 PCI 时药物数量之间的关系。处方药物的中位数为 9 种。123名患者发生了主要心血管不良事件(MACE),即心血管死亡、心肌梗死、中风、心力衰竭、短暂性脑缺血发作或不稳定型心绞痛,68名患者全因死亡。每增加一种药物,MACE 和全因死亡率的调整危险比分别增加 2.069(p = 0.003)和 1.102(p = 0.010)。与使用 8 种或更少的药物组相比,使用 9 种或更多药物组的 MACE 和全因死亡率调整后危险比明显更高(1.646 和 2.253,均为 p <0.001)。对于慢性心肌梗死患者,在控制合并症和使用指南推荐药物的同时,尽可能减少用药数量可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship between the number of drugs used during percutaneous coronary intervention and adverse events in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: Analysis of CLIDAS database

Background

Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of adverse events due to the higher number of drugs used. This is particularly notable in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), who are known to use a large number of drugs. Therefore, we investigated polypharmacy in patients with CCS, using CLIDAS, a multicenter database of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

Method and results

Between 2017 and 2020, 1411 CCS patients (71.5 ± 10.5 years old; 77.3 % male) were enrolled. The relationship between cardiovascular events occurring during the median follow-up of 514 days and the number of drugs at the time of PCI was investigated. The median number of drugs prescribed was nine. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, transient ischemic attack, or unstable angina, occurred in 123 patients, and all-cause mortality occurred in 68 patients. For each additional drug, the adjusted hazard ratios for MACE and all-cause mortality increased by 2.069 (p = 0.003) and 1.102 (p = 0.010). The adjusted hazard ratios for MACE and all-cause mortality were significantly higher in the group using nine or more drugs compared to the group using eight or fewer drugs (1.646 and 2.253, both p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study showed that an increase in the number of drugs used for CCS may be associated with MACE and all-cause mortality. In patients with CCS, it might be beneficial to minimize the number of medications as much as possible, while managing comorbidities and using guideline-recommended drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
期刊最新文献
Ten-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: The OBSERVANT study Postoperative delirium in patients undergoing TAVI versus SAVR – A systematic review and meta-analysis Age-dependent hypertrophy and fibrosis dynamics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Insights from longitudinal CMR studies Role of Lipoprotein (A) in aortic valve stenosis: Novel disease mechanisms and emerging pharmacotherapeutic approaches Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with balloon-expandable valves versus self-expanding valves in patients with small aortic annulus undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score matched studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1