联合放牧情况下草地牧草资源的可变性以及食草哺乳动物群对牧草资源的分割

IF 0.6 Q4 ECOLOGY Arid Ecosystems Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1134/S2079096124700094
B. D. Abaturov
{"title":"联合放牧情况下草地牧草资源的可变性以及食草哺乳动物群对牧草资源的分割","authors":"B. D. Abaturov","doi":"10.1134/S2079096124700094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A negative dependence of the digestibility of grassland vegetation on the amount of grasses in the feed consumed, which is in turn associated with an increased content of silicon compounds in grasses, is found. Using the example of four species of herbivores (Przewalski’s horse, American bison, Bactrian camel, and saiga), which differ in the specifics of digestion, the selectivity of their nutrition was studied in relation to two groups of plants differing in digestibility—grasses and forbs. Saigas, like other obviously highly selective consumers of easily digestible food, strictly select forbs with a low silicon content and high digestibility. With the dominance of low-digestible grasses on the grassland and their forced consumption, the saiga population is not viable. Horses and bison, like other representatives of equines and large ruminants, due to the characteristics of the digestive system, are able to assimilate low-digestible grass feeds successfully and are highly specialized in feeding on grasses. The exclusion of forbs from the diet of horses and bison is associated with the increased toxicity of this group of plants. Camels do not discriminate in the choice of grasses and forbs of different nutritional value and currently actively use fallow areas (on former arable land) dominated by weedy plants, which are avoided by other herbivores. Different specialization in the choice of forage plants when different species of animals graze together causes their division in the use of grassland feed resources, eliminates competition between them, and acts as a necessary factor in preserving the species diversity of grassland vegetation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44316,"journal":{"name":"Arid Ecosystems","volume":"14 2","pages":"202 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability of Grassland Forage Resources and Their Division by a Complex of Herbivorous Mammals in the Case of Joint Grazing\",\"authors\":\"B. D. Abaturov\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S2079096124700094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A negative dependence of the digestibility of grassland vegetation on the amount of grasses in the feed consumed, which is in turn associated with an increased content of silicon compounds in grasses, is found. Using the example of four species of herbivores (Przewalski’s horse, American bison, Bactrian camel, and saiga), which differ in the specifics of digestion, the selectivity of their nutrition was studied in relation to two groups of plants differing in digestibility—grasses and forbs. Saigas, like other obviously highly selective consumers of easily digestible food, strictly select forbs with a low silicon content and high digestibility. With the dominance of low-digestible grasses on the grassland and their forced consumption, the saiga population is not viable. Horses and bison, like other representatives of equines and large ruminants, due to the characteristics of the digestive system, are able to assimilate low-digestible grass feeds successfully and are highly specialized in feeding on grasses. The exclusion of forbs from the diet of horses and bison is associated with the increased toxicity of this group of plants. Camels do not discriminate in the choice of grasses and forbs of different nutritional value and currently actively use fallow areas (on former arable land) dominated by weedy plants, which are avoided by other herbivores. Different specialization in the choice of forage plants when different species of animals graze together causes their division in the use of grassland feed resources, eliminates competition between them, and acts as a necessary factor in preserving the species diversity of grassland vegetation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arid Ecosystems\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"202 - 208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arid Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S2079096124700094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arid Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S2079096124700094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 研究发现,草原植被的消化率与饲料中草的含量呈负相关,而这又与草中硅化合物含量的增加有关。以消化特性不同的四种食草动物(普氏马、美洲野牛、双峰驼和赛加马)为例,研究了它们对两类消化率不同的植物(禾本科植物和草本植物)的营养选择性。与其他明显对易消化食物具有高度选择性的动物一样,赛加也严格选择硅含量低、消化率高的草本植物。由于低消化率的牧草在草原上占主导地位并被强迫食用,赛加种群无法生存。马和野牛与其他马科动物和大型反刍动物的代表一样,由于消化系统的特点,能够成功地吸收低消化率的草类饲料,并高度专门化地以草为食。马和野牛的食物中不包括草本植物与这类植物的毒性增加有关。骆驼在选择不同营养价值的草和牧草时没有区别对待,它们目前积极利用以杂草植物为主的休耕区(以前的耕地),而其他食草动物则避而远之。当不同种类的动物一起吃草时,它们在选择饲料植物时的不同专业性导致了它们在利用草原饲料资源时的分工,消除了它们之间的竞争,并成为保护草原植被物种多样性的一个必要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Variability of Grassland Forage Resources and Their Division by a Complex of Herbivorous Mammals in the Case of Joint Grazing

A negative dependence of the digestibility of grassland vegetation on the amount of grasses in the feed consumed, which is in turn associated with an increased content of silicon compounds in grasses, is found. Using the example of four species of herbivores (Przewalski’s horse, American bison, Bactrian camel, and saiga), which differ in the specifics of digestion, the selectivity of their nutrition was studied in relation to two groups of plants differing in digestibility—grasses and forbs. Saigas, like other obviously highly selective consumers of easily digestible food, strictly select forbs with a low silicon content and high digestibility. With the dominance of low-digestible grasses on the grassland and their forced consumption, the saiga population is not viable. Horses and bison, like other representatives of equines and large ruminants, due to the characteristics of the digestive system, are able to assimilate low-digestible grass feeds successfully and are highly specialized in feeding on grasses. The exclusion of forbs from the diet of horses and bison is associated with the increased toxicity of this group of plants. Camels do not discriminate in the choice of grasses and forbs of different nutritional value and currently actively use fallow areas (on former arable land) dominated by weedy plants, which are avoided by other herbivores. Different specialization in the choice of forage plants when different species of animals graze together causes their division in the use of grassland feed resources, eliminates competition between them, and acts as a necessary factor in preserving the species diversity of grassland vegetation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arid Ecosystems
Arid Ecosystems ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Arid Ecosystems  publishes original scientific research articles on desert and semidesert ecosystems and environment:systematic studies of arid territories: climate changes, water supply of territories, soils as ecological factors of ecosystems state and dynamics in different scales (from local to global);systematic studies of arid ecosystems: composition and structure, diversity, ecology; paleohistory; dynamics under anthropogenic and natural factors impact, including climate changes; studying of bioresources and biodiversity, and development of the mapping methods;arid ecosystems protection: development of the theory and methods of degradation prevention and monitoring; desert ecosystems rehabilitation;problems of desertification: theoretical and practical issues of modern aridization processes under anthropogenic impact and global climate changes.
期刊最新文献
Environmental Health Standards of Arid Soils in Southern Russia under Pollution by Oil and Oil Products Exogenous Processes and Soil Cover in the Area of Large Reservoirs Spatial-Temporal Changes in Water Mineralization in Artificial Water Bodies of Kalmykia Reconstruction of Paleoecological Conditions of the Middle Bronze Bazed on the Study of Buried Soils of Kamensk Area, Rostov Region Anthropogenic Impact on Solonetz Soils Development in the Desert–Steppe Zone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1