Charlene V Chabata, Haixiang Yu, Lei Ke, James Walter Frederiksen, Prakash A Patel, Bruce Sullenger, Nabil K Thalji
{"title":"心脏手术中与安体舒通α相关的肝素抗性:机制和体外前景","authors":"Charlene V Chabata, Haixiang Yu, Lei Ke, James Walter Frederiksen, Prakash A Patel, Bruce Sullenger, Nabil K Thalji","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.09.612152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is the only FDA-approved antidote for direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors but has been reported to cause resistance to unfractionated heparin (UFH). This has delayed anticoagulation for procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The mechanism, andexanet and UFH dose dependence, and thrombotic risk of andexanet-associated heparin resistance are unknown. Methods: The effect of andexanet in vitro was determined using activated clotting times (ACT) and thromboelastography (TEG). Ex vivo CPB circuits were used to determine whether andexanet impaired anticoagulation for extracorporeal circulation. Kinetics of antithrombin (AT) inhibition of FXa and thrombin were measured in the presence of andexanet. Equilibrium modeling and thrombin generation assay (TGA) validation were used to predict the role of andexanet, AT, and UFH concentrations in andexanet-associated heparin resistance. Results: Andexanet prevented UFH-mediated prolongation of ACT and TEG times. At lower concentrations of andexanet, heparin resistance could be overcome with suprapharmacologic doses of UFH, but not at higher andexanet concentrations. Andexanet rendered standard doses of UFH inadequate to prevent circuit thrombosis, and suprapharmacologic UFH doses were only partially able to overcome this. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated coagulation activation in circuits. Andexanet prevented UFH enhancement of AT-mediated inhibition of FXa and thrombin. Equilibrium modeling and TGA validation demonstrated that andexanet creates a triphasic equilibrium with UFH and AT: initial UFH unresponsiveness, normal UFH responsiveness when andexanet is depleted, and finally AT depletion. Sufficient CPB heparinization can only occur at low therapeutic andexanet doses and normal AT levels. Higher andexanet doses or AT deficiency may require both AT supplementation and very high UFH doses. Conclusions: Andexanet causes heparin resistance due to redistribution of UFH-bound AT. If andexanet cannot be avoided prior to heparinization and direct thrombin inhibitors are undesirable, our in vitro study suggests excess UFH should be considered as a potential strategy prior to AT supplementation.","PeriodicalId":501147,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Biochemistry","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Andexanet alfa-associated heparin resistance in cardiac surgery: mechanism and in vitro perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Charlene V Chabata, Haixiang Yu, Lei Ke, James Walter Frederiksen, Prakash A Patel, Bruce Sullenger, Nabil K Thalji\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.09.612152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is the only FDA-approved antidote for direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors but has been reported to cause resistance to unfractionated heparin (UFH). This has delayed anticoagulation for procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The mechanism, andexanet and UFH dose dependence, and thrombotic risk of andexanet-associated heparin resistance are unknown. Methods: The effect of andexanet in vitro was determined using activated clotting times (ACT) and thromboelastography (TEG). Ex vivo CPB circuits were used to determine whether andexanet impaired anticoagulation for extracorporeal circulation. Kinetics of antithrombin (AT) inhibition of FXa and thrombin were measured in the presence of andexanet. Equilibrium modeling and thrombin generation assay (TGA) validation were used to predict the role of andexanet, AT, and UFH concentrations in andexanet-associated heparin resistance. Results: Andexanet prevented UFH-mediated prolongation of ACT and TEG times. At lower concentrations of andexanet, heparin resistance could be overcome with suprapharmacologic doses of UFH, but not at higher andexanet concentrations. Andexanet rendered standard doses of UFH inadequate to prevent circuit thrombosis, and suprapharmacologic UFH doses were only partially able to overcome this. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated coagulation activation in circuits. Andexanet prevented UFH enhancement of AT-mediated inhibition of FXa and thrombin. Equilibrium modeling and TGA validation demonstrated that andexanet creates a triphasic equilibrium with UFH and AT: initial UFH unresponsiveness, normal UFH responsiveness when andexanet is depleted, and finally AT depletion. Sufficient CPB heparinization can only occur at low therapeutic andexanet doses and normal AT levels. Higher andexanet doses or AT deficiency may require both AT supplementation and very high UFH doses. Conclusions: Andexanet causes heparin resistance due to redistribution of UFH-bound AT. If andexanet cannot be avoided prior to heparinization and direct thrombin inhibitors are undesirable, our in vitro study suggests excess UFH should be considered as a potential strategy prior to AT supplementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.612152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.612152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:安得生α(andexanet alfa)是美国食品及药物管理局批准的唯一一种直接 Xa 因子(FXa)抑制剂的解毒剂,但有报道称它会导致对非分数肝素(UFH)产生耐药性。这延误了需要心肺旁路(CPB)手术的抗凝治疗。目前尚不清楚安乃近和 UFH 剂量依赖性的机制以及安乃近相关肝素抗性的血栓风险。研究方法使用活化凝血时间(ACT)和血栓弹性成像(TEG)确定安乃近在体外的作用。使用体外 CPB 循环来确定安乃近是否会损害体外循环的抗凝作用。在安乃近存在的情况下,测量了抗凝血酶(AT)抑制 FXa 和凝血酶的动力学。利用平衡建模和凝血酶生成测定(TGA)验证来预测安乃近、AT 和 UFH 浓度在安乃近相关肝素抗性中的作用。结果显示安乃近能防止 UFH 介导的 ACT 和 TEG 时间延长。在安乃近浓度较低时,肝素抵抗可通过超药物剂量的 UFH 来克服,但在安乃近浓度较高时则无法克服。安乃近使标准剂量的 UFH 不足以防止回路血栓形成,而超药物剂量的 UFH 只能部分克服这一问题。扫描电子显微镜显示了回路中的凝血活化。Andexanet 阻止了 UFH 对 AT 介导的 FXa 和凝血酶抑制作用的增强。平衡模型和 TGA 验证表明,安乃近与 UFH 和 AT 形成了三相平衡:最初 UFH 无反应,安乃近耗尽时 UFH 反应正常,最后 AT 耗尽。只有在安乃近治疗剂量较低和 AT 水平正常的情况下,CPB 才能充分发挥肝素化作用。较高的安乃近剂量或 AT 缺乏可能需要同时补充 AT 和超高剂量的 UFH。结论:安乃近会因 UFH 结合的 AT 的重新分布而导致肝素抵抗。如果在肝素化之前不能避免使用安乃近,又不希望使用直接凝血酶抑制剂,那么我们的体外研究表明,在补充 AT 之前,应考虑将过量 UFH 作为一种可能的策略。
Andexanet alfa-associated heparin resistance in cardiac surgery: mechanism and in vitro perspectives
Background: Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is the only FDA-approved antidote for direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors but has been reported to cause resistance to unfractionated heparin (UFH). This has delayed anticoagulation for procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The mechanism, andexanet and UFH dose dependence, and thrombotic risk of andexanet-associated heparin resistance are unknown. Methods: The effect of andexanet in vitro was determined using activated clotting times (ACT) and thromboelastography (TEG). Ex vivo CPB circuits were used to determine whether andexanet impaired anticoagulation for extracorporeal circulation. Kinetics of antithrombin (AT) inhibition of FXa and thrombin were measured in the presence of andexanet. Equilibrium modeling and thrombin generation assay (TGA) validation were used to predict the role of andexanet, AT, and UFH concentrations in andexanet-associated heparin resistance. Results: Andexanet prevented UFH-mediated prolongation of ACT and TEG times. At lower concentrations of andexanet, heparin resistance could be overcome with suprapharmacologic doses of UFH, but not at higher andexanet concentrations. Andexanet rendered standard doses of UFH inadequate to prevent circuit thrombosis, and suprapharmacologic UFH doses were only partially able to overcome this. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated coagulation activation in circuits. Andexanet prevented UFH enhancement of AT-mediated inhibition of FXa and thrombin. Equilibrium modeling and TGA validation demonstrated that andexanet creates a triphasic equilibrium with UFH and AT: initial UFH unresponsiveness, normal UFH responsiveness when andexanet is depleted, and finally AT depletion. Sufficient CPB heparinization can only occur at low therapeutic andexanet doses and normal AT levels. Higher andexanet doses or AT deficiency may require both AT supplementation and very high UFH doses. Conclusions: Andexanet causes heparin resistance due to redistribution of UFH-bound AT. If andexanet cannot be avoided prior to heparinization and direct thrombin inhibitors are undesirable, our in vitro study suggests excess UFH should be considered as a potential strategy prior to AT supplementation.