基于培养和 ddPCR 的废水碳青霉烯耐药菌监测对比分析

IF 3.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1039/d4ew00525b
Siyi Zhou, Esther G. Lou, Julia Schedler, Katherine B. Ensor, Loren Hopkins, Lauren B. Stadler
{"title":"基于培养和 ddPCR 的废水碳青霉烯耐药菌监测对比分析","authors":"Siyi Zhou, Esther G. Lou, Julia Schedler, Katherine B. Ensor, Loren Hopkins, Lauren B. Stadler","doi":"10.1039/d4ew00525b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the widespread use of last-resort antibiotics, carbapenems, clinical reports of infections associated with carbapenem-resistant <em>Enterobacterales</em> (CRE) have increased. Clinical surveillance for CRE involves susceptibility testing and/or whole genome sequencing of resistant isolates, which is laborious, resource intensive, and requires expertise. Wastewater surveillance can potentially complement clinical surveillance of CRE, and population-level antibiotic resistance (AR) surveillance more broadly. In this study, we quantitatively and qualitatively compared two widely used methods for AR wastewater surveillance: (1) a culture-based approach for quantifying carbapenem-resistant bacteria and (2) a digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assay targeting five major carbapenemase-encoding genes. We developed a new multiplexed ddPCR assay to detect five carbapenemase-encoding genes and applied it to wastewater samples from three sites over 12 weeks. In parallel, we quantified carbapenem resistant bacteria and carbapenemase-producing bacteria using culture-based methods. We assessed associations between the concentrations of carbapenemase-encoding genes and resistant bacteria. Although both approaches showed similar trends in the overall abundance of dominant carbapenem-resistant bacteria and genes, there were weak correlations between the quantitative levels of resistance. Nanopore sequencing of the resistome of the carbapenem-resistant bacteria revealed that discrepancies arose from differences in the sensitivity and specificity of the methods. This study highlights tradeoffs between methods: culture-based methods offer detailed phenotypic data on carbapenem-resistant bacteria but have longer turnaround times and lower throughput, whereas ddPCR offers rapid, sensitive detection but may miss some resistance mechanisms. Integrating these methods with sequencing provides sensitive, quantitative AR information and their clinical relevance.","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of culture- and ddPCR-based wastewater surveillance for carbapenem-resistant bacteria\",\"authors\":\"Siyi Zhou, Esther G. Lou, Julia Schedler, Katherine B. Ensor, Loren Hopkins, Lauren B. Stadler\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d4ew00525b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the widespread use of last-resort antibiotics, carbapenems, clinical reports of infections associated with carbapenem-resistant <em>Enterobacterales</em> (CRE) have increased. Clinical surveillance for CRE involves susceptibility testing and/or whole genome sequencing of resistant isolates, which is laborious, resource intensive, and requires expertise. Wastewater surveillance can potentially complement clinical surveillance of CRE, and population-level antibiotic resistance (AR) surveillance more broadly. In this study, we quantitatively and qualitatively compared two widely used methods for AR wastewater surveillance: (1) a culture-based approach for quantifying carbapenem-resistant bacteria and (2) a digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assay targeting five major carbapenemase-encoding genes. We developed a new multiplexed ddPCR assay to detect five carbapenemase-encoding genes and applied it to wastewater samples from three sites over 12 weeks. In parallel, we quantified carbapenem resistant bacteria and carbapenemase-producing bacteria using culture-based methods. We assessed associations between the concentrations of carbapenemase-encoding genes and resistant bacteria. Although both approaches showed similar trends in the overall abundance of dominant carbapenem-resistant bacteria and genes, there were weak correlations between the quantitative levels of resistance. Nanopore sequencing of the resistome of the carbapenem-resistant bacteria revealed that discrepancies arose from differences in the sensitivity and specificity of the methods. This study highlights tradeoffs between methods: culture-based methods offer detailed phenotypic data on carbapenem-resistant bacteria but have longer turnaround times and lower throughput, whereas ddPCR offers rapid, sensitive detection but may miss some resistance mechanisms. Integrating these methods with sequencing provides sensitive, quantitative AR information and their clinical relevance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ew00525b\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ew00525b","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着耐碳青霉烯类抗生素(碳青霉烯类抗生素)的广泛使用,耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)相关感染的临床报告也在增加。对 CRE 的临床监测需要对耐药分离株进行药敏试验和/或全基因组测序,这不仅费力、耗费资源,而且需要专业知识。废水监测有可能对 CRE 的临床监测以及更广泛的人群抗生素耐药性 (AR) 监测起到补充作用。在这项研究中,我们对两种广泛使用的 AR 废水监测方法进行了定量和定性比较:(1) 基于培养的碳青霉烯耐药细菌定量方法;(2) 针对五种主要碳青霉烯酶编码基因的数字液滴 PCR (ddPCR) 检测方法。我们开发了一种新的多重 ddPCR 检测方法来检测五种碳青霉烯酶编码基因,并将其应用于三个地点的废水样本,历时 12 周。与此同时,我们还使用基于培养的方法对碳青霉烯类耐药菌和碳青霉烯类酶产生菌进行了量化。我们评估了碳青霉烯酶编码基因浓度与耐药细菌之间的关联。虽然这两种方法都显示了显性耐碳青霉烯类细菌和基因总体数量的相似趋势,但耐药性的定量水平之间的相关性很弱。对碳青霉烯类耐药细菌耐药基因组的纳米孔测序显示,两种方法的灵敏度和特异性存在差异。这项研究强调了各种方法之间的权衡:基于培养的方法可提供耐碳青霉烯类细菌的详细表型数据,但周转时间较长,通量较低;而 ddPCR 可提供快速、灵敏的检测,但可能会漏掉一些耐药机制。将这些方法与测序结合可提供灵敏、定量的 AR 信息及其临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of culture- and ddPCR-based wastewater surveillance for carbapenem-resistant bacteria
With the widespread use of last-resort antibiotics, carbapenems, clinical reports of infections associated with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) have increased. Clinical surveillance for CRE involves susceptibility testing and/or whole genome sequencing of resistant isolates, which is laborious, resource intensive, and requires expertise. Wastewater surveillance can potentially complement clinical surveillance of CRE, and population-level antibiotic resistance (AR) surveillance more broadly. In this study, we quantitatively and qualitatively compared two widely used methods for AR wastewater surveillance: (1) a culture-based approach for quantifying carbapenem-resistant bacteria and (2) a digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assay targeting five major carbapenemase-encoding genes. We developed a new multiplexed ddPCR assay to detect five carbapenemase-encoding genes and applied it to wastewater samples from three sites over 12 weeks. In parallel, we quantified carbapenem resistant bacteria and carbapenemase-producing bacteria using culture-based methods. We assessed associations between the concentrations of carbapenemase-encoding genes and resistant bacteria. Although both approaches showed similar trends in the overall abundance of dominant carbapenem-resistant bacteria and genes, there were weak correlations between the quantitative levels of resistance. Nanopore sequencing of the resistome of the carbapenem-resistant bacteria revealed that discrepancies arose from differences in the sensitivity and specificity of the methods. This study highlights tradeoffs between methods: culture-based methods offer detailed phenotypic data on carbapenem-resistant bacteria but have longer turnaround times and lower throughput, whereas ddPCR offers rapid, sensitive detection but may miss some resistance mechanisms. Integrating these methods with sequencing provides sensitive, quantitative AR information and their clinical relevance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
期刊最新文献
Back cover A comprehensive study on the physicochemical characteristics of faecal sludge from Septic Tanks and Single Pit Latrines facilities in a typical semi-urban Indian town: A Case Study of Rajasthan, India Lead ions (Pb2+) Electrochemical Sensors Based on Novel Schiff Base Ligands Concurrent Boron Removal from Reverse Osmosis Concentrated and Energy Production using Microbial Desalination Cell-Donnan Dialysis Hybrid System Investigation of the effect of Al2O3/water nanofluid on the performance of a thermoelectric cooler to harvest water from humid air
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1