从职业生涯的角度看工作中优势的利用

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Career Development International Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1108/cdi-12-2023-0433
Marianne van Woerkom
{"title":"从职业生涯的角度看工作中优势的利用","authors":"Marianne van Woerkom","doi":"10.1108/cdi-12-2023-0433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>While the career literature does acknowledge that personal strengths may function as protective factors that increase the likelihood of positive career outcomes, the topic of strengths has predominantly been studied in the context of career guidance for adolescents and young adults. However, the evolution of strengths persists throughout the entire career and individuals’ awareness and inclination to leverage their strengths change when aging. This paper aims to examine strengths over the (career) lifespan.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>For this purpose, a conceptual analysis was made of the interplay between age and strengths application within the work environment, based on a narrative review of both empirical and conceptual literature on strengths and lifespan (career) development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Based on lifespan development theory and results from studies that investigate the relationship between age and strengths, it can be expected that the prominence, awareness and use of strengths, as well as the active engagement in strengths development increase with age. Also, based on the corresponsive principle it is proposed that strengths prominence is reciprocally related to the awareness, use and development of strengths. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Whereas positive psychology has contributed to research on career development by its focus on healthy functioning, human potential and well-being the implications from theorizing and research on strengths for the career-lifespan are still relatively unclear. This paper develops testable propositions regarding the relationship between age and strengths and discusses implications for the types of organizational support for strengths that workers of different ages might need.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":9597,"journal":{"name":"Career Development International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A career-lifespan perspective on strengths utilization at work\",\"authors\":\"Marianne van Woerkom\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cdi-12-2023-0433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>While the career literature does acknowledge that personal strengths may function as protective factors that increase the likelihood of positive career outcomes, the topic of strengths has predominantly been studied in the context of career guidance for adolescents and young adults. However, the evolution of strengths persists throughout the entire career and individuals’ awareness and inclination to leverage their strengths change when aging. This paper aims to examine strengths over the (career) lifespan.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>For this purpose, a conceptual analysis was made of the interplay between age and strengths application within the work environment, based on a narrative review of both empirical and conceptual literature on strengths and lifespan (career) development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Based on lifespan development theory and results from studies that investigate the relationship between age and strengths, it can be expected that the prominence, awareness and use of strengths, as well as the active engagement in strengths development increase with age. Also, based on the corresponsive principle it is proposed that strengths prominence is reciprocally related to the awareness, use and development of strengths. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Whereas positive psychology has contributed to research on career development by its focus on healthy functioning, human potential and well-being the implications from theorizing and research on strengths for the career-lifespan are still relatively unclear. This paper develops testable propositions regarding the relationship between age and strengths and discusses implications for the types of organizational support for strengths that workers of different ages might need.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":9597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Career Development International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Career Development International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-12-2023-0433\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Career Development International","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-12-2023-0433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的虽然职业文献确实承认个人优势可以作为保护因素,增加取得积极职业成果的可能性,但优势这一主题主要是在青少年和年轻成年人职业指导的背景下进行研究的。然而,优势的演变贯穿整个职业生涯,随着年龄的增长,个人对利用自身优势的认识和倾向也会发生变化。本文旨在研究人在(职业)生命周期中的优势。为此,本文在对有关优势和生命周期(职业)发展的实证文献和概念文献进行叙述性回顾的基础上,对年龄与优势在工作环境中的应用之间的相互作用进行了概念性分析。研究结果根据生命周期发展理论和有关年龄与优势之间关系的研究结果,可以预计,随着年龄的增长,优势的突出程度、对优势的认识和使用,以及对优势发展的积极参与程度都会增加。此外,根据相关原则,我们还提出优势的突出与优势的认识、使用和发展是相互关联的。本文讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。原创性/价值积极心理学通过关注健康功能、人类潜能和幸福感为职业发展研究做出了贡献,而优势理论和研究对职业生涯的影响还相对不明确。本文就年龄与优势之间的关系提出了一些可检验的命题,并讨论了不同年龄段的员工可能需要的组织优势支持类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A career-lifespan perspective on strengths utilization at work

Purpose

While the career literature does acknowledge that personal strengths may function as protective factors that increase the likelihood of positive career outcomes, the topic of strengths has predominantly been studied in the context of career guidance for adolescents and young adults. However, the evolution of strengths persists throughout the entire career and individuals’ awareness and inclination to leverage their strengths change when aging. This paper aims to examine strengths over the (career) lifespan.

Design/methodology/approach

For this purpose, a conceptual analysis was made of the interplay between age and strengths application within the work environment, based on a narrative review of both empirical and conceptual literature on strengths and lifespan (career) development.

Findings

Based on lifespan development theory and results from studies that investigate the relationship between age and strengths, it can be expected that the prominence, awareness and use of strengths, as well as the active engagement in strengths development increase with age. Also, based on the corresponsive principle it is proposed that strengths prominence is reciprocally related to the awareness, use and development of strengths. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

Originality/value

Whereas positive psychology has contributed to research on career development by its focus on healthy functioning, human potential and well-being the implications from theorizing and research on strengths for the career-lifespan are still relatively unclear. This paper develops testable propositions regarding the relationship between age and strengths and discusses implications for the types of organizational support for strengths that workers of different ages might need.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Careers and Development are inter-related fields of study with connections to many academic disciplines, organizational practices and policy developments in the emerging knowledge economies and learning societies of the modern world. Career Development International provides a platform for research in these areas that deals with questions of theories and theory development, as well as with organizational career strategy, policy and practice. Issues of theory and of practice may be dealt with at individual, organizational and society levels. The international character of submissions may have two aspects. Submissions may be international in their scope, dealing with a topic that is of concern to researchers throughout the world rather than of sole interest to a national audience. Alternatively, submissions may be international in content, relating, for example, to comparative analyses of careers and development across national boundaries, or dealing with inherently ''international'' issues such as expatriation. Coverage: -Individual careers - psychological and developmental perspectives -Career interventions (systems and tools, mentoring, etc) -Government policy and practices -HR planning and recruitment -International themes and issues (MNCs, expatriation, etc) -Organizational strategies and systems -Performance management -Work and occupational contexts
期刊最新文献
The dark side of work-life policies: the influence of co-workers taking childcare leave on work anxiety “Follow the leader”: how inclusive leaders inspire followers to perform well through strengths use A career-lifespan perspective on strengths utilization at work Effects of social impact and task variety on innovative work behavior: the mediating role of work meaningfulness Building a sustainable career during the initial transition to work: a multiple-stakeholder perspective on proactive behaviors and contextual factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1