单层和双层脂质动力学精确建模面临的挑战

Carmelo Tempra, Victor Cruces Chamorro, Titas Mandal, Salvatore Chiantia, Martin Vogele, Balazs Fabian, Matti Javanainen
{"title":"单层和双层脂质动力学精确建模面临的挑战","authors":"Carmelo Tempra, Victor Cruces Chamorro, Titas Mandal, Salvatore Chiantia, Martin Vogele, Balazs Fabian, Matti Javanainen","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.12.612735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances in hydrodynamic theory have revealed the severe effect of periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) on the diffusive dynamics of lipid membranes in molecular dynamics simulations. Even when accounting for PBC effects, the corrected lipid diffusion coefficients often severely overshoot the experimental estimates. Here, we investigate the underlying reasons for the exaggerated dynamics, and suggest potential ways for improvement.\nTo this end, we examine the diffusion of four lipid types in both bilayers and monolayers using the CHARMM36 force field. We account for PBC effects using the full hydrodynamic treatment: for bilayers we use non-equilibrium simulations to extract the interleaflet friction parameter used in the correction; whereas monolayer hydrodynamics are treated by setting this parameter to zero.\nOur results suggest that the dynamics of bilayers are too fast, even if interleaflet friction is accounted for. However, the change of the water model to OPC leads to an excellent agreement with experiments. For monolayers, the dynamics with the TIP3P water model agree well with experiments, whereas they are undershot with OPC. As OPC and TIP3P differ in both shear viscosity and surface tension, we develop two new mass-scaled water models to clarify the roles of the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the water model on lipid dynamics. Our results indicate that both of these quantities play a major role in lipid dynamics. Moreover, it seems that the accurate description of diffusion in both lipid bilayers and monolayers cannot be accounted for by changes in the water model alone, but likely also requires modifications in the lipid model.","PeriodicalId":501048,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Biophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in the Accurate Modelling of Lipid Dynamics in Monolayers and Bilayers\",\"authors\":\"Carmelo Tempra, Victor Cruces Chamorro, Titas Mandal, Salvatore Chiantia, Martin Vogele, Balazs Fabian, Matti Javanainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.12.612735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent advances in hydrodynamic theory have revealed the severe effect of periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) on the diffusive dynamics of lipid membranes in molecular dynamics simulations. Even when accounting for PBC effects, the corrected lipid diffusion coefficients often severely overshoot the experimental estimates. Here, we investigate the underlying reasons for the exaggerated dynamics, and suggest potential ways for improvement.\\nTo this end, we examine the diffusion of four lipid types in both bilayers and monolayers using the CHARMM36 force field. We account for PBC effects using the full hydrodynamic treatment: for bilayers we use non-equilibrium simulations to extract the interleaflet friction parameter used in the correction; whereas monolayer hydrodynamics are treated by setting this parameter to zero.\\nOur results suggest that the dynamics of bilayers are too fast, even if interleaflet friction is accounted for. However, the change of the water model to OPC leads to an excellent agreement with experiments. For monolayers, the dynamics with the TIP3P water model agree well with experiments, whereas they are undershot with OPC. As OPC and TIP3P differ in both shear viscosity and surface tension, we develop two new mass-scaled water models to clarify the roles of the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the water model on lipid dynamics. Our results indicate that both of these quantities play a major role in lipid dynamics. Moreover, it seems that the accurate description of diffusion in both lipid bilayers and monolayers cannot be accounted for by changes in the water model alone, but likely also requires modifications in the lipid model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Biophysics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Biophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.12.612735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.12.612735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流体力学理论的最新进展揭示了在分子动力学模拟中周期性边界条件(PBC)对脂质膜扩散动力学的严重影响。即使考虑了 PBC 的影响,校正后的脂质扩散系数也往往严重偏离实验估计值。为此,我们使用 CHARMM36 力场研究了四种脂质在双层和单层中的扩散情况。我们使用完整的流体动力学处理方法来考虑 PBC 效应:对于双分子层,我们使用非平衡模拟来提取校正中使用的叶间摩擦参数;而单分子层的流体动力学处理方法是将该参数设置为零。然而,将水模型改为 OPC 后,与实验结果非常吻合。对于单层膜,TIP3P 水模型的动态与实验结果非常吻合,而 OPC 模型的动态则偏低。由于 OPC 和 TIP3P 的剪切粘度和表面张力不同,我们开发了两种新的质量标度水模型,以阐明水模型的热力学和动力学特性对脂质动力学的作用。我们的结果表明,这两个量在脂质动力学中都起着重要作用。此外,要准确描述脂质双分子层和单分子层中的扩散,似乎不能仅靠水模型的变化,可能还需要对脂模型进行修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Challenges in the Accurate Modelling of Lipid Dynamics in Monolayers and Bilayers
Recent advances in hydrodynamic theory have revealed the severe effect of periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) on the diffusive dynamics of lipid membranes in molecular dynamics simulations. Even when accounting for PBC effects, the corrected lipid diffusion coefficients often severely overshoot the experimental estimates. Here, we investigate the underlying reasons for the exaggerated dynamics, and suggest potential ways for improvement. To this end, we examine the diffusion of four lipid types in both bilayers and monolayers using the CHARMM36 force field. We account for PBC effects using the full hydrodynamic treatment: for bilayers we use non-equilibrium simulations to extract the interleaflet friction parameter used in the correction; whereas monolayer hydrodynamics are treated by setting this parameter to zero. Our results suggest that the dynamics of bilayers are too fast, even if interleaflet friction is accounted for. However, the change of the water model to OPC leads to an excellent agreement with experiments. For monolayers, the dynamics with the TIP3P water model agree well with experiments, whereas they are undershot with OPC. As OPC and TIP3P differ in both shear viscosity and surface tension, we develop two new mass-scaled water models to clarify the roles of the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the water model on lipid dynamics. Our results indicate that both of these quantities play a major role in lipid dynamics. Moreover, it seems that the accurate description of diffusion in both lipid bilayers and monolayers cannot be accounted for by changes in the water model alone, but likely also requires modifications in the lipid model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
De-novo design of actively spinning and gyrating spherical micro-vesicles Localization of Albumin with Correlative Super Resolution Light- and Electron Microscopy in the Kidney Mechanical Profiling of Biopolymer Condensates through Acoustic Trapping Unlocking precision: How corneal cell area analysis revolutionises post-transplant stem cell monitoring A combined approach to extract rotational dynamics of globular proteins undergoing liquid-liquid phase separation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1