信息和传播技术对劳动生产率的影响:通过喀麦隆企业联合使用信息和传播技术工具的棱镜重新审视索洛悖论

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of the Knowledge Economy Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1007/s13132-024-02241-z
Cosmas Bernard Meka’a, Astride Claudel Njiepue Nouffeussie, Fabrice Nzepang
{"title":"信息和传播技术对劳动生产率的影响:通过喀麦隆企业联合使用信息和传播技术工具的棱镜重新审视索洛悖论","authors":"Cosmas Bernard Meka’a, Astride Claudel Njiepue Nouffeussie, Fabrice Nzepang","doi":"10.1007/s13132-024-02241-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper re-examines Solow’s productivity paradox through the prism of the joint use of ICT tools. On the one hand, the joint use of ICT tools implies heterogeneous, hierarchical, and complementary skills and, on the other hand, constitutes a larger consumption network. This study uses data from the enterprise survey conducted by the World Bank on a representative sample of 361 Cameroonian firms to re-examine this productivity paradox. These data have the advantage of providing information on the characteristics and productivity of firms, as well as on the different types of ICT used. Methodologically, the study uses a Tobit model with instrumental variables to take account of ICT endogeneity problems and the truncated, censored nature of our productivity measure. The main results suggest that (i) the use of a single ICT tool (mobile money, website, or email) has a positive but insignificant effect on worker productivity; (ii) the use of two or more of these tools (email-mobile money, email-website, mobile money-email-website) positively and significantly affects worker productivity, by 5.881, 6.189, and 8.881 points, respectively; (iii) company size, sector of activity, and previous productivity positively and significantly affect labor productivity. This study argues in favor of the joint use of ICT tools requiring different, complementary, and prioritized skills in order to significantly increase productivity. Specifically, it is in the interests of large companies and companies in the industrial and service sectors to mobilize several ICT tools requiring complementary skills.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":47435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of ICTs on Labor Productivity: A Re-examination of Solow’s Paradox Through the Prism of the Joint Use of ICT Tools in Cameroonian Firms\",\"authors\":\"Cosmas Bernard Meka’a, Astride Claudel Njiepue Nouffeussie, Fabrice Nzepang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13132-024-02241-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper re-examines Solow’s productivity paradox through the prism of the joint use of ICT tools. On the one hand, the joint use of ICT tools implies heterogeneous, hierarchical, and complementary skills and, on the other hand, constitutes a larger consumption network. This study uses data from the enterprise survey conducted by the World Bank on a representative sample of 361 Cameroonian firms to re-examine this productivity paradox. These data have the advantage of providing information on the characteristics and productivity of firms, as well as on the different types of ICT used. Methodologically, the study uses a Tobit model with instrumental variables to take account of ICT endogeneity problems and the truncated, censored nature of our productivity measure. The main results suggest that (i) the use of a single ICT tool (mobile money, website, or email) has a positive but insignificant effect on worker productivity; (ii) the use of two or more of these tools (email-mobile money, email-website, mobile money-email-website) positively and significantly affects worker productivity, by 5.881, 6.189, and 8.881 points, respectively; (iii) company size, sector of activity, and previous productivity positively and significantly affect labor productivity. This study argues in favor of the joint use of ICT tools requiring different, complementary, and prioritized skills in order to significantly increase productivity. Specifically, it is in the interests of large companies and companies in the industrial and service sectors to mobilize several ICT tools requiring complementary skills.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Knowledge Economy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Knowledge Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02241-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02241-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从共同使用信息和通信技术工具的角度重新审视索洛的生产力悖论。一方面,共同使用信息和通信技术工具意味着技能的异质性、层次性和互补性,另一方面,也构成了一个更大的消费网络。本研究利用世界银行对 361 家喀麦隆企业的代表性样本进行的企业调查数据,重新审视这一生产率悖论。这些数据的优势在于提供了有关企业特点和生产率的信息,以及所使用的各类信息和通信技术的信息。在方法上,本研究采用了带有工具变量的托比特模型,以考虑信息和通信技术的内生性问题以及我们的生产率衡量标准的截断、删减性质。主要结果表明:(i) 使用单一信息和通信技术工具(移动支付、网站或电子邮件)对工人的生产率有积极但不显著的影响;(ii) 使用两种或两种以上这些工具(电子邮件-移动支付、电子邮件-网站、移动支付-电子邮件-网站)对工人的生产率有积极和显著的影响,分别为 5.881、6.189 和 8.881 个点;(iii) 公司规模、活动部门和以前的生产率对劳动生产率有积极和显著的影响。本研究支持联合使用需要不同技能、互补技能和优先技能的信息与通信技术工具,以显著提高生产率。具体而言,大型公司以及工业和服务业公司应调动多种需要互补技能的信息和通信技术工具,这符合它们的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of ICTs on Labor Productivity: A Re-examination of Solow’s Paradox Through the Prism of the Joint Use of ICT Tools in Cameroonian Firms

This paper re-examines Solow’s productivity paradox through the prism of the joint use of ICT tools. On the one hand, the joint use of ICT tools implies heterogeneous, hierarchical, and complementary skills and, on the other hand, constitutes a larger consumption network. This study uses data from the enterprise survey conducted by the World Bank on a representative sample of 361 Cameroonian firms to re-examine this productivity paradox. These data have the advantage of providing information on the characteristics and productivity of firms, as well as on the different types of ICT used. Methodologically, the study uses a Tobit model with instrumental variables to take account of ICT endogeneity problems and the truncated, censored nature of our productivity measure. The main results suggest that (i) the use of a single ICT tool (mobile money, website, or email) has a positive but insignificant effect on worker productivity; (ii) the use of two or more of these tools (email-mobile money, email-website, mobile money-email-website) positively and significantly affects worker productivity, by 5.881, 6.189, and 8.881 points, respectively; (iii) company size, sector of activity, and previous productivity positively and significantly affect labor productivity. This study argues in favor of the joint use of ICT tools requiring different, complementary, and prioritized skills in order to significantly increase productivity. Specifically, it is in the interests of large companies and companies in the industrial and service sectors to mobilize several ICT tools requiring complementary skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
27.30%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.
期刊最新文献
An Engagement Between Faculty Adeptness, Learner’s Expectations, Usage of Technology, and Perceived Learner’s Learning Outcome: Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence Impact of Mobile Money on Resilience to Health Shocks in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Togo The Fishing and Aquaculture Production of Latin America with Respect to the Trade Balance and Foreign Investment Effects of ICTs on Labor Productivity: A Re-examination of Solow’s Paradox Through the Prism of the Joint Use of ICT Tools in Cameroonian Firms Career Imprints from Diverse Institutional Settings: a Comparative Study of Academic and Non-academic Partnered Ventures in Technopolis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1