父亲参加早产儿父母准备 (P3) 计划对夫妻早产准备的影响

Mir A Basir, Siobhan McDonnell, Ruta Brazauskas, U Olivia Kim, S Iqbal Ahamed, Jennifer J McIntosh, Kris Pizur-Barnekow, Michael B Pitt, Abbey Kruper, Steven R Leuthner, Kathryn E Flynn
{"title":"父亲参加早产儿父母准备 (P3) 计划对夫妻早产准备的影响","authors":"Mir A Basir, Siobhan McDonnell, Ruta Brazauskas, U Olivia Kim, S Iqbal Ahamed, Jennifer J McIntosh, Kris Pizur-Barnekow, Michael B Pitt, Abbey Kruper, Steven R Leuthner, Kathryn E Flynn","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.11.24313503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nEvaluate the effect of fathers participation in the Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on maternal learning and fathers preterm birth knowledge.\nMethods\nMothers with preterm birth predisposing medical condition(s) enrolled with or without the father of the baby and were randomized to the P3 intervention (text-messages linking to animated videos) or control (patient education webpages). Parent Prematurity Knowledge Questionnaire assessed knowledge, including unmarried fathers legal neonatal decision-making ability.\nResults\n104 mothers reported living with the father of the baby; 50 participated with the father and 54 participated alone. In the P3 group, mothers participating with the father (n=33) had greater knowledge than mothers participating alone (n=21), 85% correct responses vs. 76%, p=0.033. However, there was no difference in knowledge among the control mothers, 67% vs. 60%, p=0.068. P3 fathers (n=33) knowledge scores were not different than control fathers (n=17), 77% vs. 68%, p=0.054. Parents who viewed the video on fathers rights (n=58) were more likely than those who did not (n=96) to know unmarried fathers legal inability to decide neonatal treatments, 84% vs. 41%, p<0.001.\nConclusions\nAmong opposite-sex cohabitating couples, fathers participation in the P3 program enhanced maternal learning. Practice Implications\nThe potential of the P3 program to educate fathers may benefit high-risk pregnancies.","PeriodicalId":501549,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pediatrics","volume":"273 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Fathers in Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) Program on Couples Preterm Birth Preparedness\",\"authors\":\"Mir A Basir, Siobhan McDonnell, Ruta Brazauskas, U Olivia Kim, S Iqbal Ahamed, Jennifer J McIntosh, Kris Pizur-Barnekow, Michael B Pitt, Abbey Kruper, Steven R Leuthner, Kathryn E Flynn\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.11.24313503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective\\nEvaluate the effect of fathers participation in the Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on maternal learning and fathers preterm birth knowledge.\\nMethods\\nMothers with preterm birth predisposing medical condition(s) enrolled with or without the father of the baby and were randomized to the P3 intervention (text-messages linking to animated videos) or control (patient education webpages). Parent Prematurity Knowledge Questionnaire assessed knowledge, including unmarried fathers legal neonatal decision-making ability.\\nResults\\n104 mothers reported living with the father of the baby; 50 participated with the father and 54 participated alone. In the P3 group, mothers participating with the father (n=33) had greater knowledge than mothers participating alone (n=21), 85% correct responses vs. 76%, p=0.033. However, there was no difference in knowledge among the control mothers, 67% vs. 60%, p=0.068. P3 fathers (n=33) knowledge scores were not different than control fathers (n=17), 77% vs. 68%, p=0.054. Parents who viewed the video on fathers rights (n=58) were more likely than those who did not (n=96) to know unmarried fathers legal inability to decide neonatal treatments, 84% vs. 41%, p<0.001.\\nConclusions\\nAmong opposite-sex cohabitating couples, fathers participation in the P3 program enhanced maternal learning. Practice Implications\\nThe potential of the P3 program to educate fathers may benefit high-risk pregnancies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"273 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.24313503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.24313503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估父亲参与早产儿父母准备计划(P3)对母亲学习和父亲早产知识的影响。方法 患有早产倾向性疾病的母亲在有或没有婴儿父亲的情况下注册,并随机接受 P3 干预(链接到动画视频的文本消息)或对照(患者教育网页)。家长早产儿知识问卷评估了相关知识,包括未婚父亲的新生儿法律决策能力。结果104名母亲称与婴儿的父亲住在一起;50名母亲与父亲一起参加,54名母亲单独参加。在 P3 组中,与父亲共同参与的母亲(人数=33)比单独参与的母亲(人数=21)拥有更多的知识,正确回答率为 85% 对 76%,P=0.033。然而,对照组母亲的知识水平没有差异,分别为 67% 对 60%,P=0.068。P3 父亲(人数=33)的知识得分与对照组父亲(人数=17)没有差异,分别为 77% 对 68%,p=0.054。观看了父亲权利视频的父母(人数=58)比未观看视频的父母(人数=96)更有可能知道未婚父亲在法律上不能决定新生儿治疗,84% 对 41%,p<0.001.结论在异性同居夫妇中,父亲参与 P3 计划可提高母亲的学习能力。实践启示P3 计划在教育父亲方面的潜力可能会使高危妊娠受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Fathers in Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) Program on Couples Preterm Birth Preparedness
Objective Evaluate the effect of fathers participation in the Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on maternal learning and fathers preterm birth knowledge. Methods Mothers with preterm birth predisposing medical condition(s) enrolled with or without the father of the baby and were randomized to the P3 intervention (text-messages linking to animated videos) or control (patient education webpages). Parent Prematurity Knowledge Questionnaire assessed knowledge, including unmarried fathers legal neonatal decision-making ability. Results 104 mothers reported living with the father of the baby; 50 participated with the father and 54 participated alone. In the P3 group, mothers participating with the father (n=33) had greater knowledge than mothers participating alone (n=21), 85% correct responses vs. 76%, p=0.033. However, there was no difference in knowledge among the control mothers, 67% vs. 60%, p=0.068. P3 fathers (n=33) knowledge scores were not different than control fathers (n=17), 77% vs. 68%, p=0.054. Parents who viewed the video on fathers rights (n=58) were more likely than those who did not (n=96) to know unmarried fathers legal inability to decide neonatal treatments, 84% vs. 41%, p<0.001. Conclusions Among opposite-sex cohabitating couples, fathers participation in the P3 program enhanced maternal learning. Practice Implications The potential of the P3 program to educate fathers may benefit high-risk pregnancies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Nirsevimab in Reducing Pediatric RSV Hospitalizations in Spain The Impact of Chlorinated Drinking Water Exposure on Gut Microbiota Development in Infants: a Randomised Controlled Trial. Development of a Novel Dynamic Leak Model to Simulate Leak for Performance Testing of Manual Neonatal Resuscitation Devices. Does Leak Matter? A Bench Study How young people experienced Long COVID services: a qualitative analysis. Knowledge of Childhood and Adolescent Cancer Among Primary Caregivers: An Observational and Prospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1