大麻使用障碍患者戒烟原因量表的验证。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Substance Use & Misuse Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1080/10826084.2024.2392508
Bryant M Stone,David G Gilbert
{"title":"大麻使用障碍患者戒烟原因量表的验证。","authors":"Bryant M Stone,David G Gilbert","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2392508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe prevalence of cannabis use disorder (CUD) has increased in the last ten years with medicinal and recreational legalization across the United States and increasing accessibility worldwide. Estimates suggest that 8-18% of individuals who use cannabis meet diagnostic criteria for CUD, leading to significant impairments across functioning. However, there are currently no measures that assess the reasons for quitting smoking cannabis to use in treatments with validation evidence in those with CUD.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nWe validated the Reasons for Quitting Smoking Cannabis Scale (RQSCS) in adults (n = 133) who meet the diagnostic criteria for CUD as part of a laboratory-based clinical trial on transdermal nicotine patches for cannabis withdrawal symptoms (R01DA031006). We conducted standard psychometric testing, including exploratory factor analyses, estimating internal consistencies, exploring demographic variation, and testing construct validity.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe RQSCS demonstrated a four-factor structure, including: (1) cognitive health, (2) social functioning, (3) health problems, (4) reputation, and a single item that assesses experimental incentive; λs > .410), with acceptable to high internal consistencies for each subscale (αs > .725). The scale demonstrated strong construct validity and minor demographic variation. Finally, all subscales were sensitive to detecting reasons for quitting cannabis and differentially predicted cannabis use 31 days after the study.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe RQSCS is a psychometrically robust, timely instrument for assessing the reasons for quitting smoking cannabis in individuals with CUD. The scale has the potential to provide useful information for clinicians attempting to help those with CUD reduce or cease their cannabis use, informing individualized treatment plans and enhancing motivation for change.","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Reasons for Quitting Smoking Cannabis Scale Among People with Cannabis Use Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Bryant M Stone,David G Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10826084.2024.2392508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThe prevalence of cannabis use disorder (CUD) has increased in the last ten years with medicinal and recreational legalization across the United States and increasing accessibility worldwide. Estimates suggest that 8-18% of individuals who use cannabis meet diagnostic criteria for CUD, leading to significant impairments across functioning. However, there are currently no measures that assess the reasons for quitting smoking cannabis to use in treatments with validation evidence in those with CUD.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHOD\\r\\nWe validated the Reasons for Quitting Smoking Cannabis Scale (RQSCS) in adults (n = 133) who meet the diagnostic criteria for CUD as part of a laboratory-based clinical trial on transdermal nicotine patches for cannabis withdrawal symptoms (R01DA031006). We conducted standard psychometric testing, including exploratory factor analyses, estimating internal consistencies, exploring demographic variation, and testing construct validity.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe RQSCS demonstrated a four-factor structure, including: (1) cognitive health, (2) social functioning, (3) health problems, (4) reputation, and a single item that assesses experimental incentive; λs > .410), with acceptable to high internal consistencies for each subscale (αs > .725). The scale demonstrated strong construct validity and minor demographic variation. Finally, all subscales were sensitive to detecting reasons for quitting cannabis and differentially predicted cannabis use 31 days after the study.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThe RQSCS is a psychometrically robust, timely instrument for assessing the reasons for quitting smoking cannabis in individuals with CUD. The scale has the potential to provide useful information for clinicians attempting to help those with CUD reduce or cease their cannabis use, informing individualized treatment plans and enhancing motivation for change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2392508\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2392508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景过去十年来,随着美国各地医疗和娱乐大麻合法化以及全球范围内大麻使用的日益普及,大麻使用障碍(CUD)的患病率有所上升。据估计,8%-18% 的大麻使用者符合 CUD 的诊断标准,从而导致功能严重受损。方法我们在符合 CUD 诊断标准的成年人(n = 133)中验证了 "戒烟原因量表"(RQSCS),该量表是基于实验室的经皮尼古丁贴片治疗大麻戒断症状临床试验(R01DA031006)的一部分。我们进行了标准的心理测试,包括探索性因子分析、估计内部一致性、探索人口统计学变异和测试建构效度。结果RQSCS显示了四因子结构,包括:(1) 认知健康、(2) 社会功能、(3) 健康问题、(4) 声誉和一个评估实验激励的单个项目;λs > .410),每个分量表的内部一致性为可接受到较高(αs > .725)。该量表具有较强的建构效度,人口统计学差异较小。最后,所有分量表都能敏感地检测出戒除大麻的原因,并对研究 31 天后的大麻使用情况做出不同的预测。该量表有可能为试图帮助 CUD 患者减少或停止使用大麻的临床医生提供有用的信息,从而为个性化治疗计划提供依据并增强改变的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Reasons for Quitting Smoking Cannabis Scale Among People with Cannabis Use Disorder.
BACKGROUND The prevalence of cannabis use disorder (CUD) has increased in the last ten years with medicinal and recreational legalization across the United States and increasing accessibility worldwide. Estimates suggest that 8-18% of individuals who use cannabis meet diagnostic criteria for CUD, leading to significant impairments across functioning. However, there are currently no measures that assess the reasons for quitting smoking cannabis to use in treatments with validation evidence in those with CUD. METHOD We validated the Reasons for Quitting Smoking Cannabis Scale (RQSCS) in adults (n = 133) who meet the diagnostic criteria for CUD as part of a laboratory-based clinical trial on transdermal nicotine patches for cannabis withdrawal symptoms (R01DA031006). We conducted standard psychometric testing, including exploratory factor analyses, estimating internal consistencies, exploring demographic variation, and testing construct validity. RESULTS The RQSCS demonstrated a four-factor structure, including: (1) cognitive health, (2) social functioning, (3) health problems, (4) reputation, and a single item that assesses experimental incentive; λs > .410), with acceptable to high internal consistencies for each subscale (αs > .725). The scale demonstrated strong construct validity and minor demographic variation. Finally, all subscales were sensitive to detecting reasons for quitting cannabis and differentially predicted cannabis use 31 days after the study. CONCLUSION The RQSCS is a psychometrically robust, timely instrument for assessing the reasons for quitting smoking cannabis in individuals with CUD. The scale has the potential to provide useful information for clinicians attempting to help those with CUD reduce or cease their cannabis use, informing individualized treatment plans and enhancing motivation for change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of Alcohol, Cannabis, and E-Cigarette Use/Co-Use and Mental Health Among U.S. College Students. Associations of Minority Stressors, Alcohol Use Disorder, Resilience, and HIV Testing Self-Efficacy Among Community-Based Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in a Southern U.S. City: A Causal Mediation and Moderation Analysis. Differentiating the Contribution of Context-Specific Social Influences on Underage Youth's Alcohol Consumption. Flavored Tobacco User Characteristics in U.S. young Adults: Wave 5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Use of cannabis for mental health in the Canadian territories: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1