基因组对决:乳酸杆菌属和粘液酵母菌益生菌潜力的硅学比较

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408
Nayeema Bulbul, Jinath Sultana, Ashrafus Safa, Md. Asaduzzaman Shishir, Bakhtiar Ul Islam, Md. Fakruddin, Md. Abu Bakar karim
{"title":"基因组对决:乳酸杆菌属和粘液酵母菌益生菌潜力的硅学比较","authors":"Nayeema Bulbul, Jinath Sultana, Ashrafus Safa, Md. Asaduzzaman Shishir, Bakhtiar Ul Islam, Md. Fakruddin, Md. Abu Bakar karim","doi":"10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining human health, and probiotics have gained significant attention for their potential benefits. Among the diverse array of gut bacteria, Akkermansia muciniphila, and Lactobacillus spp. have emerged as promising candidates for their putative probiotic properties. Method: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparative in silico analysis of the genomes of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus to decipher their probiotic potential. Utilizing a range of bioinformatics tools, we evaluated various genomic attributes, including functional gene content, metabolic pathways, antimicrobial peptide production, adhesion factors, and stress response elements. These findings revealed distinctive genomic signatures between the two genera. A. muciniphila genomes exhibited a high prevalence of mucin-degrading enzymes, suggesting a specialized adaptation for mucin utilization in the gut environment. Results: Additionally, the presence of specific pathways for short-chain fatty acid production highlighted its potential impact on host health. Lactobacillus genomes, on the other hand, demonstrated a diverse repertoire of functional genes associated with probiotic attributes, including the production of antimicrobial peptides and adhesion factors, indicating potential for host-microbe interactions and immune modulation. Furthermore, this analysis unveiled the genetic basis of stress tolerance in both genera, revealing conserved mechanisms for surviving the dynamic conditions of the gut ecosystem. Conclusion: This study also shed light on the distribution of antibiotic-resistance genes, allowing us to assess safety concerns associated with their potential use as probiotics. Overall, this comparative in silico exploration provides valuable insights into the genomic foundation of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus probiotic potential. These findings contribute to the understanding of their respective roles within the gut microbiota and offer a foundation for further experimental investigations. As probiotic applications continue to expand, this study advances our knowledge of the genetic underpinnings that govern their functionality and highlights promising avenues for future therapeutic interventions and personalized health strategies.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic Face-Off: An In Silico Comparison of the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus spp. and Akkermansia muciniphila\",\"authors\":\"Nayeema Bulbul, Jinath Sultana, Ashrafus Safa, Md. Asaduzzaman Shishir, Bakhtiar Ul Islam, Md. Fakruddin, Md. Abu Bakar karim\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining human health, and probiotics have gained significant attention for their potential benefits. Among the diverse array of gut bacteria, Akkermansia muciniphila, and Lactobacillus spp. have emerged as promising candidates for their putative probiotic properties. Method: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparative in silico analysis of the genomes of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus to decipher their probiotic potential. Utilizing a range of bioinformatics tools, we evaluated various genomic attributes, including functional gene content, metabolic pathways, antimicrobial peptide production, adhesion factors, and stress response elements. These findings revealed distinctive genomic signatures between the two genera. A. muciniphila genomes exhibited a high prevalence of mucin-degrading enzymes, suggesting a specialized adaptation for mucin utilization in the gut environment. Results: Additionally, the presence of specific pathways for short-chain fatty acid production highlighted its potential impact on host health. Lactobacillus genomes, on the other hand, demonstrated a diverse repertoire of functional genes associated with probiotic attributes, including the production of antimicrobial peptides and adhesion factors, indicating potential for host-microbe interactions and immune modulation. Furthermore, this analysis unveiled the genetic basis of stress tolerance in both genera, revealing conserved mechanisms for surviving the dynamic conditions of the gut ecosystem. Conclusion: This study also shed light on the distribution of antibiotic-resistance genes, allowing us to assess safety concerns associated with their potential use as probiotics. Overall, this comparative in silico exploration provides valuable insights into the genomic foundation of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus probiotic potential. These findings contribute to the understanding of their respective roles within the gut microbiota and offer a foundation for further experimental investigations. As probiotic applications continue to expand, this study advances our knowledge of the genetic underpinnings that govern their functionality and highlights promising avenues for future therapeutic interventions and personalized health strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:肠道微生物群在维持人体健康方面发挥着至关重要的作用,益生菌因其潜在的益处而备受关注。在多种多样的肠道细菌中,Akkermansia muciniphila 和乳酸杆菌因其潜在的益生特性而成为有希望的候选菌。研究方法在本研究中,我们对粘液鞘氨醇和乳酸杆菌的基因组进行了全面的比较硅分析,以解读它们的益生潜力。利用一系列生物信息学工具,我们评估了各种基因组属性,包括功能基因含量、代谢途径、抗菌肽生产、粘附因子和应激反应元件。这些发现揭示了两个属之间独特的基因组特征。A. muciniphila基因组中粘蛋白降解酶的含量较高,这表明它们专门适应了肠道环境中粘蛋白的利用。结果:此外,短链脂肪酸生产的特殊途径突出了其对宿主健康的潜在影响。另一方面,乳酸杆菌基因组展示了与益生菌属性相关的多种功能基因,包括生产抗微生物肽和粘附因子,这表明乳酸杆菌具有宿主-微生物相互作用和免疫调节的潜力。此外,这项分析还揭示了这两个菌属耐受压力的遗传基础,揭示了在肠道生态系统动态条件下生存的保守机制。结论这项研究还揭示了抗生素耐药性基因的分布情况,使我们能够评估与它们可能用作益生菌相关的安全问题。总之,这项硅学比较探索为了解粘多糖酵母菌和乳酸杆菌益生菌潜力的基因组基础提供了宝贵的见解。这些发现有助于人们了解它们各自在肠道微生物群中的作用,并为进一步的实验研究奠定了基础。随着益生菌应用范围的不断扩大,这项研究增进了我们对支配益生菌功能的基因基础的了解,并为未来的治疗干预和个性化健康策略指明了前景广阔的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genomic Face-Off: An In Silico Comparison of the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus spp. and Akkermansia muciniphila
Introduction: The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining human health, and probiotics have gained significant attention for their potential benefits. Among the diverse array of gut bacteria, Akkermansia muciniphila, and Lactobacillus spp. have emerged as promising candidates for their putative probiotic properties. Method: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparative in silico analysis of the genomes of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus to decipher their probiotic potential. Utilizing a range of bioinformatics tools, we evaluated various genomic attributes, including functional gene content, metabolic pathways, antimicrobial peptide production, adhesion factors, and stress response elements. These findings revealed distinctive genomic signatures between the two genera. A. muciniphila genomes exhibited a high prevalence of mucin-degrading enzymes, suggesting a specialized adaptation for mucin utilization in the gut environment. Results: Additionally, the presence of specific pathways for short-chain fatty acid production highlighted its potential impact on host health. Lactobacillus genomes, on the other hand, demonstrated a diverse repertoire of functional genes associated with probiotic attributes, including the production of antimicrobial peptides and adhesion factors, indicating potential for host-microbe interactions and immune modulation. Furthermore, this analysis unveiled the genetic basis of stress tolerance in both genera, revealing conserved mechanisms for surviving the dynamic conditions of the gut ecosystem. Conclusion: This study also shed light on the distribution of antibiotic-resistance genes, allowing us to assess safety concerns associated with their potential use as probiotics. Overall, this comparative in silico exploration provides valuable insights into the genomic foundation of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus probiotic potential. These findings contribute to the understanding of their respective roles within the gut microbiota and offer a foundation for further experimental investigations. As probiotic applications continue to expand, this study advances our knowledge of the genetic underpinnings that govern their functionality and highlights promising avenues for future therapeutic interventions and personalized health strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1