Deborah Burn, Andrew S. Hoey, Chiara Pisapia, Josie F. Chandler, Cassandra A. Thompson, Morgan S. Pratchett
{"title":"澳大利亚珊瑚海和大堡礁海洋公园的幼年珊瑚组合比较","authors":"Deborah Burn, Andrew S. Hoey, Chiara Pisapia, Josie F. Chandler, Cassandra A. Thompson, Morgan S. Pratchett","doi":"10.1007/s00338-024-02541-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Densities of juvenile corals (≤ 50 mm diameter) are expected to vary between geographically isolated and more spatially proximate reefs, and may constrain local recovery potential. This study compared juvenile coral densities and their relationships with local abundance of adult congenerics at geographically isolated reefs within Australia’s Coral Sea Marine Park (CSMP) versus highly connected reefs within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP). Three latitudinal regions and two habitats (reef crest and slope) were examined within both marine parks to test for spatial variation. Densities of juvenile corals in the CSMP (13.99 ± 0.72 juveniles 10 m<sup>−2</sup>) were significantly lower compared to those in the GBRMP (23.72 ± 1.86 juveniles 10 m<sup>−2</sup>). Specifically, there were significantly less <i>Acropora</i> and <i>Pocillopora</i> juveniles on the reef crest in the central CSMP compared to the GBRMP. Relationships between juvenile abundance and percent coral cover were greatest for <i>Acropora</i> and <i>Pocillopora</i> in the GBRMP. This may be due to the low range of coral cover estimates recorded in the CSMP, especially for <i>Acropora</i> (0–15%). Low juvenile coral abundance, and in particular, the lack of fast-growing juvenile corals (e.g., <i>Acropora</i>) in the Central CSMP, in combination with low cover of broodstock (particularly <i>Acropora</i>) on CSMP reefs, poses a significant constraint on post-disturbance recovery capacity, possibly attributable to isolation and limited connectivity among reefs in this region.</p>","PeriodicalId":10821,"journal":{"name":"Coral Reefs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of juvenile coral assemblages between Australia’s Coral Sea and Great Barrier Reef Marine Parks\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Burn, Andrew S. Hoey, Chiara Pisapia, Josie F. Chandler, Cassandra A. Thompson, Morgan S. Pratchett\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00338-024-02541-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Densities of juvenile corals (≤ 50 mm diameter) are expected to vary between geographically isolated and more spatially proximate reefs, and may constrain local recovery potential. This study compared juvenile coral densities and their relationships with local abundance of adult congenerics at geographically isolated reefs within Australia’s Coral Sea Marine Park (CSMP) versus highly connected reefs within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP). Three latitudinal regions and two habitats (reef crest and slope) were examined within both marine parks to test for spatial variation. Densities of juvenile corals in the CSMP (13.99 ± 0.72 juveniles 10 m<sup>−2</sup>) were significantly lower compared to those in the GBRMP (23.72 ± 1.86 juveniles 10 m<sup>−2</sup>). Specifically, there were significantly less <i>Acropora</i> and <i>Pocillopora</i> juveniles on the reef crest in the central CSMP compared to the GBRMP. Relationships between juvenile abundance and percent coral cover were greatest for <i>Acropora</i> and <i>Pocillopora</i> in the GBRMP. This may be due to the low range of coral cover estimates recorded in the CSMP, especially for <i>Acropora</i> (0–15%). Low juvenile coral abundance, and in particular, the lack of fast-growing juvenile corals (e.g., <i>Acropora</i>) in the Central CSMP, in combination with low cover of broodstock (particularly <i>Acropora</i>) on CSMP reefs, poses a significant constraint on post-disturbance recovery capacity, possibly attributable to isolation and limited connectivity among reefs in this region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coral Reefs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coral Reefs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-024-02541-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coral Reefs","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-024-02541-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of juvenile coral assemblages between Australia’s Coral Sea and Great Barrier Reef Marine Parks
Densities of juvenile corals (≤ 50 mm diameter) are expected to vary between geographically isolated and more spatially proximate reefs, and may constrain local recovery potential. This study compared juvenile coral densities and their relationships with local abundance of adult congenerics at geographically isolated reefs within Australia’s Coral Sea Marine Park (CSMP) versus highly connected reefs within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP). Three latitudinal regions and two habitats (reef crest and slope) were examined within both marine parks to test for spatial variation. Densities of juvenile corals in the CSMP (13.99 ± 0.72 juveniles 10 m−2) were significantly lower compared to those in the GBRMP (23.72 ± 1.86 juveniles 10 m−2). Specifically, there were significantly less Acropora and Pocillopora juveniles on the reef crest in the central CSMP compared to the GBRMP. Relationships between juvenile abundance and percent coral cover were greatest for Acropora and Pocillopora in the GBRMP. This may be due to the low range of coral cover estimates recorded in the CSMP, especially for Acropora (0–15%). Low juvenile coral abundance, and in particular, the lack of fast-growing juvenile corals (e.g., Acropora) in the Central CSMP, in combination with low cover of broodstock (particularly Acropora) on CSMP reefs, poses a significant constraint on post-disturbance recovery capacity, possibly attributable to isolation and limited connectivity among reefs in this region.
期刊介绍:
Coral Reefs, the Journal of the International Coral Reef Society, presents multidisciplinary literature across the broad fields of reef studies, publishing analytical and theoretical papers on both modern and ancient reefs. These encourage the search for theories about reef structure and dynamics, and the use of experimentation, modeling, quantification and the applied sciences.
Coverage includes such subject areas as population dynamics; community ecology of reef organisms; energy and nutrient flows; biogeochemical cycles; physiology of calcification; reef responses to natural and anthropogenic influences; stress markers in reef organisms; behavioural ecology; sedimentology; diagenesis; reef structure and morphology; evolutionary ecology of the reef biota; palaeoceanography of coral reefs and coral islands; reef management and its underlying disciplines; molecular biology and genetics of coral; aetiology of disease in reef-related organisms; reef responses to global change, and more.