人工耳蜗植入术后的跨模态功能可塑性

Jamal Esmaelpoor, Tommy Peng, Beth Jelfs, Darren Mao, Maureen J. Shader, Colette M. McKay
{"title":"人工耳蜗植入术后的跨模态功能可塑性","authors":"Jamal Esmaelpoor, Tommy Peng, Beth Jelfs, Darren Mao, Maureen J. Shader, Colette M. McKay","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.22.24312200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Despite evidence that cross-modal effects after hearing loss and cochlear implantation are primarily conveyed through synaptic gain and efficacy rather than reorganized fiber tracts, few studies have assessed cross-modal functional connectivity (CMFC) to evaluate plasticity. This study, inspired by the psychophysiological interactions (PPI) method, addresses its limitations and provides a robust approach to evaluating task-induced CMFC.\nDesign: Twenty-two post-lingually deafened, newly implanted adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with severe hearing loss in the contralateral ear and 17 normal-hearing (NH) subjects participated. The experiment included audio-only and visual-only speech tasks, with resting-state FC as a baseline. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measured brain imaging data one month and one year post-implantation. CI users' speech understanding performance was evaluated one year after implantation.\nResults: A negative correlation was found between average contralateral task-induced CMFC and speech outcomes, particularly in links from the angular gyrus (AG), both one month and one year post-activation. Plastic changes showed higher task-induced CMFC in AG compared to the superior temporal gyrus (STG), aligning with neural efficiency principles. Task-induced CMFC remained elevated in CI users compared to NH cohorts even after one year.\nConclusion: Task-induced CMFC can serve as a significant marker of cross-modal plasticity and speech performance in CI recipients, indicating increased reliance on cross-modal processing in one year after implantation.","PeriodicalId":501358,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-modal Functional Plasticity after Cochlear-implantation\",\"authors\":\"Jamal Esmaelpoor, Tommy Peng, Beth Jelfs, Darren Mao, Maureen J. Shader, Colette M. McKay\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.22.24312200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Despite evidence that cross-modal effects after hearing loss and cochlear implantation are primarily conveyed through synaptic gain and efficacy rather than reorganized fiber tracts, few studies have assessed cross-modal functional connectivity (CMFC) to evaluate plasticity. This study, inspired by the psychophysiological interactions (PPI) method, addresses its limitations and provides a robust approach to evaluating task-induced CMFC.\\nDesign: Twenty-two post-lingually deafened, newly implanted adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with severe hearing loss in the contralateral ear and 17 normal-hearing (NH) subjects participated. The experiment included audio-only and visual-only speech tasks, with resting-state FC as a baseline. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measured brain imaging data one month and one year post-implantation. CI users' speech understanding performance was evaluated one year after implantation.\\nResults: A negative correlation was found between average contralateral task-induced CMFC and speech outcomes, particularly in links from the angular gyrus (AG), both one month and one year post-activation. Plastic changes showed higher task-induced CMFC in AG compared to the superior temporal gyrus (STG), aligning with neural efficiency principles. Task-induced CMFC remained elevated in CI users compared to NH cohorts even after one year.\\nConclusion: Task-induced CMFC can serve as a significant marker of cross-modal plasticity and speech performance in CI recipients, indicating increased reliance on cross-modal processing in one year after implantation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.22.24312200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.22.24312200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管有证据表明,听力损失和人工耳蜗植入后的跨模态效应主要是通过突触增益和功效而非重组纤维束传递的,但很少有研究通过评估跨模态功能连接(CMFC)来评估可塑性。本研究受心理生理学相互作用(PPI)方法的启发,解决了该方法的局限性,为评估任务诱导的CMFC提供了一种可靠的方法:22名新近植入人工耳蜗(CI)且对侧耳听力严重受损的语后聋成人受试者和17名听力正常(NH)的受试者参加了实验。实验包括纯音频和纯视觉言语任务,以静息态 FC 为基线。功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)测量了植入后一个月和一年的脑成像数据。植入 CI 一年后,对使用者的语音理解能力进行了评估:结果:在植入一个月和一年后,发现对侧任务诱导的 CMFC 平均值与语音结果之间存在负相关,尤其是在角回(AG)的链接中。塑性变化显示,与颞上回(STG)相比,AG 的任务诱导 CMFC 更高,这符合神经效率原则。即使在一年后,CI使用者的任务诱导CMFC仍然高于NH组群:任务诱导的 CMFC 可作为 CI 接受者跨模态可塑性和语言表达能力的重要标志,表明植入一年后对跨模态处理的依赖性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cross-modal Functional Plasticity after Cochlear-implantation
Objective: Despite evidence that cross-modal effects after hearing loss and cochlear implantation are primarily conveyed through synaptic gain and efficacy rather than reorganized fiber tracts, few studies have assessed cross-modal functional connectivity (CMFC) to evaluate plasticity. This study, inspired by the psychophysiological interactions (PPI) method, addresses its limitations and provides a robust approach to evaluating task-induced CMFC. Design: Twenty-two post-lingually deafened, newly implanted adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with severe hearing loss in the contralateral ear and 17 normal-hearing (NH) subjects participated. The experiment included audio-only and visual-only speech tasks, with resting-state FC as a baseline. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measured brain imaging data one month and one year post-implantation. CI users' speech understanding performance was evaluated one year after implantation. Results: A negative correlation was found between average contralateral task-induced CMFC and speech outcomes, particularly in links from the angular gyrus (AG), both one month and one year post-activation. Plastic changes showed higher task-induced CMFC in AG compared to the superior temporal gyrus (STG), aligning with neural efficiency principles. Task-induced CMFC remained elevated in CI users compared to NH cohorts even after one year. Conclusion: Task-induced CMFC can serve as a significant marker of cross-modal plasticity and speech performance in CI recipients, indicating increased reliance on cross-modal processing in one year after implantation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auto-segmentation of hemi-diaphragms in free-breathing dynamic MRI of pediatric subjects with thoracic insufficiency syndrome Dynamic MR of muscle contraction during electrical muscle stimulation as a potential diagnostic tool for neuromuscular disease Deriving Imaging Biomarkers for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Using Deep Learning Exploring subthreshold functional network alterations in women with phenylketonuria by higher criticism Beyond Algorithms: The Impact of Simplified CNN Models and Multifactorial Influences on Radiological Image Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1