当第一次尝试失败时:在普外科住院医生中重新实施 SIMPL

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02557-2
Phillip J. Hsu, Gregory Wnuk, Lisa Leininger, Samantha Peterson, David T. Hughes, Gurjit Sandhu, Jay B. Zwischenberger, Brian C. George, Staci Aubry
{"title":"当第一次尝试失败时:在普外科住院医生中重新实施 SIMPL","authors":"Phillip J. Hsu, Gregory Wnuk, Lisa Leininger, Samantha Peterson, David T. Hughes, Gurjit Sandhu, Jay B. Zwischenberger, Brian C. George, Staci Aubry","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02557-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workplace-based assessment (WBA) can facilitate evaluation of operative performance; however, implementation of WBA is sometimes unsuccessful. The American Board of Surgery Entrustable Professional Activities WBA project was launched in July 2023. Some programs will face the challenge of re-implementation of a WBA following previous failures. It is unknown what interventions are most effective for WBA re-implementation. Our goal is to identify barriers and facilitators to re-implementing SIMPL, an operative performance WBA. The System for Improving and Measuring Procedural Learning (SIMPL) was implemented at our residency in 2018, but usage rates were low. We interviewed residents and faculty to identify barriers to usage and opportunities for improvement. Residents reported that SIMPL usage declined because of several factors, including a low faculty response rate, while some faculty reported not responding because they were unable to login to the app and because usage was not mandated. We then re-implemented SIMPL using a plan based on Kotter’s Model of Change. To evaluate impact, we analyzed rates of SIMPL usage when it was first implemented, as well as before and after the date of re-implementation. In September 2022, we re-implemented SIMPL at our program with measures addressing the identified barriers. We found that, in the six months after re-implementation, an average of 145.8 evaluations were submitted by residents per month, compared with 47 evaluations per month at the start of the original implementation and 5.8 evaluations per month just prior to re-implementation. Faculty completed 60.6% of evaluations and dictated feedback for 59.1% of these evaluations, compared with 69.1% at implementation (44% dictated) and 43% prior to re-implementation (53% dictated). After identifying barriers to implementation of a WBA, we re-implemented it with significantly higher usage by faculty and residents. Future opportunities exist to implement or re-implement assessment tools within general surgery programs. These opportunities may have a significant impact in the setting of national standardization of workplace-based assessment among general surgery residencies.","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When the first try fails: re-implementation of SIMPL in a general surgery residency\",\"authors\":\"Phillip J. Hsu, Gregory Wnuk, Lisa Leininger, Samantha Peterson, David T. Hughes, Gurjit Sandhu, Jay B. Zwischenberger, Brian C. George, Staci Aubry\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-024-02557-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Workplace-based assessment (WBA) can facilitate evaluation of operative performance; however, implementation of WBA is sometimes unsuccessful. The American Board of Surgery Entrustable Professional Activities WBA project was launched in July 2023. Some programs will face the challenge of re-implementation of a WBA following previous failures. It is unknown what interventions are most effective for WBA re-implementation. Our goal is to identify barriers and facilitators to re-implementing SIMPL, an operative performance WBA. The System for Improving and Measuring Procedural Learning (SIMPL) was implemented at our residency in 2018, but usage rates were low. We interviewed residents and faculty to identify barriers to usage and opportunities for improvement. Residents reported that SIMPL usage declined because of several factors, including a low faculty response rate, while some faculty reported not responding because they were unable to login to the app and because usage was not mandated. We then re-implemented SIMPL using a plan based on Kotter’s Model of Change. To evaluate impact, we analyzed rates of SIMPL usage when it was first implemented, as well as before and after the date of re-implementation. In September 2022, we re-implemented SIMPL at our program with measures addressing the identified barriers. We found that, in the six months after re-implementation, an average of 145.8 evaluations were submitted by residents per month, compared with 47 evaluations per month at the start of the original implementation and 5.8 evaluations per month just prior to re-implementation. Faculty completed 60.6% of evaluations and dictated feedback for 59.1% of these evaluations, compared with 69.1% at implementation (44% dictated) and 43% prior to re-implementation (53% dictated). After identifying barriers to implementation of a WBA, we re-implemented it with significantly higher usage by faculty and residents. Future opportunities exist to implement or re-implement assessment tools within general surgery programs. These opportunities may have a significant impact in the setting of national standardization of workplace-based assessment among general surgery residencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02557-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02557-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于工作场所的评估(WBA)可促进对手术绩效的评价;然而,WBA 的实施有时并不成功。美国外科学委员会委托专业活动 WBA 项目于 2023 年 7 月启动。一些项目在之前失败后将面临重新实施 WBA 的挑战。目前尚不清楚哪些干预措施对重新实施 WBA 最为有效。我们的目标是找出重新实施 SIMPL(一种可操作的绩效 WBA)的障碍和促进因素。2018 年,我们的住院医师培训中心实施了 "改进和衡量手术学习系统"(SIMPL),但使用率很低。我们采访了住院医师和教师,以确定使用的障碍和改进的机会。住院医师表示,SIMPL 的使用率下降有几个因素,其中包括教职员工的回复率较低,而一些教职员工则表示没有回复是因为他们无法登录应用程序,也因为没有强制要求使用。随后,我们根据科特变革模型重新实施了 SIMPL。为了评估效果,我们分析了 SIMPL 首次实施时的使用率,以及重新实施日期前后的使用率。2022 年 9 月,我们在项目中重新实施了 SIMPL,并采取了措施来解决已发现的障碍。我们发现,在重新实施后的六个月里,住院医师平均每月提交 145.8 份评估,而在最初实施之初,每月仅提交 47 份评估,在重新实施之前,每月仅提交 5.8 份评估。教员完成了 60.6% 的评估,并口述了其中 59.1% 的反馈意见,而最初实施时为 69.1%(44% 口述),重新实施前为 43%(53% 口述)。在确定了实施 WBA 的障碍后,我们重新实施了 WBA,教员和住院医师的使用率显著提高。未来有机会在普外科项目中实施或重新实施评估工具。这些机会可能会对普外科住院医师工作场所评估的全国标准化设置产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When the first try fails: re-implementation of SIMPL in a general surgery residency
Workplace-based assessment (WBA) can facilitate evaluation of operative performance; however, implementation of WBA is sometimes unsuccessful. The American Board of Surgery Entrustable Professional Activities WBA project was launched in July 2023. Some programs will face the challenge of re-implementation of a WBA following previous failures. It is unknown what interventions are most effective for WBA re-implementation. Our goal is to identify barriers and facilitators to re-implementing SIMPL, an operative performance WBA. The System for Improving and Measuring Procedural Learning (SIMPL) was implemented at our residency in 2018, but usage rates were low. We interviewed residents and faculty to identify barriers to usage and opportunities for improvement. Residents reported that SIMPL usage declined because of several factors, including a low faculty response rate, while some faculty reported not responding because they were unable to login to the app and because usage was not mandated. We then re-implemented SIMPL using a plan based on Kotter’s Model of Change. To evaluate impact, we analyzed rates of SIMPL usage when it was first implemented, as well as before and after the date of re-implementation. In September 2022, we re-implemented SIMPL at our program with measures addressing the identified barriers. We found that, in the six months after re-implementation, an average of 145.8 evaluations were submitted by residents per month, compared with 47 evaluations per month at the start of the original implementation and 5.8 evaluations per month just prior to re-implementation. Faculty completed 60.6% of evaluations and dictated feedback for 59.1% of these evaluations, compared with 69.1% at implementation (44% dictated) and 43% prior to re-implementation (53% dictated). After identifying barriers to implementation of a WBA, we re-implemented it with significantly higher usage by faculty and residents. Future opportunities exist to implement or re-implement assessment tools within general surgery programs. These opportunities may have a significant impact in the setting of national standardization of workplace-based assessment among general surgery residencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Real-world study on the application of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in video-assisted thoracoscopic day surgery for pulmonary nodule resection. The seven-day cumulative post-esophagectomy inflammatory response predicts cancer recurrence. Seprafilm® and adhesive small bowel obstruction in colorectal/abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review. The safety and efficacy of stapler method for transection of the pancreatic parenchyma during pancreatoduodenectomy (STRAP-PD trial): study protocol for a randomized control trial. Challenges and opportunities for Mohs surgery implementation in African healthcare systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1