肺炎克雷伯氏菌的临床分布和抗菌药耐药性评估

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Current Pharmaceutical Analysis Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.2174/0115734129306621240813074201
Liping Xie, Zhen’an Wu, Na Wei, Liang Zhang, Jiajian Tang, Hongmei Wang
{"title":"肺炎克雷伯氏菌的临床分布和抗菌药耐药性评估","authors":"Liping Xie, Zhen’an Wu, Na Wei, Liang Zhang, Jiajian Tang, Hongmei Wang","doi":"10.2174/0115734129306621240813074201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This paper aims to analyze the clinical distribution and drug resistance changes of Klebsiella Pneumoniae (KPN) from 2017 to 2021 in the Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine to provide a reference for the clinical rational use of antibiotics. Methods: We collected Klebsiella Pneumoniae isolated from various clinical specimens in 2017-2021, analyzed the isolation rate, specimen distribution, and department distribution characteristics during the five years, and statistically analyzed their drug sensitivity tests and multiple drug resistance. Zhuhai Deere DL-96 full-automatic microbial analyzer was used for bacterial identification and drug sensitivity tests. The drug sensitivity test was interpreted according to the standards recommended by the American Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Results: A total of 1057 strains of Klebsiella Pneumoniae were identified between 2017 and 2021, with proportions of 18.6%, 15.7%, 15.4%, 15.1%, and 15.0% in each respective year. Specimen distribution included sputum (66.0%), urine (17.9%), throat swab (9.4%), secretion (2.4%), pus (0.7%), venous blood (0.6%), vaginal swab (0.4%), and other sources (2.6%). Distribution by the department revealed specimens originating from the respiratory department (21.2%), cardiology department (17.8%), neurology department (13.4%), oncology department (13.0%), nephrology department (12.2%), acupuncture department (10.1%), and other departments (12.3%). In terms of drug susceptibility testing, Klebsiella Pneumoniae exhibited high resistance rates to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and ampicillin/sulbactam, with rates of 50.8%, 46.8%, 46.3%, and 43.6% respectively. Conversely, resistance rates to minocycline, amikacin, imipenem, and meropenem were relatively low, at 8.6%, 16.5%, 8.5%, and 9.4% respectively. Resistance rates to cefepime/- sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam were 29.9% and 28.9%, respectively, while cephalosporin resistance rates ranged from 36.1% to 50.8%. Regarding multidrug resistance, the detection rates of ESBL-producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae were 8.2%, 10.9%, 4.5%, 10.6%, and 6.4% from 2017 to 2021, with an average detection rate of 7.9%. The detection rates of CR-Kp were 12.1%, 11.7%, 5.8%, 9.9%, and 8.9% respectively, averaging 9.6% over the five-year period. Conclusion: The sputum specimen of Klebsiella Pneumoniae exhibits the highest detection rate among specimen distributions, signifying its significance as a pathogenic bacterium in respiratory tract infections. Notably, the respiratory department demonstrates the highest detection rate, underscoring the necessity to enhance the monitoring and management of Klebsiella Pneumoniae infections in respiratory patients. Over the past five years, our hospital has observed a decreasing trend in the overall drug resistance rate of Klebsiella Pneumoniae to 17 antibiotics. While imipenem and meropenem exhibit minimal resistance rates, these carbapenem antibiotics serve as crucial agents for treating gram-negative bacilli, particularly in critically ill patients, and are thus not recommended as first-line choices for routine clinical use. Conversely, minocycline, amikacin, ceftazidime/ sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam showcase relatively low resistance rates, enabling their empirical use based on clinical experience. Combination therapy with other antibiotics is advised for amikacin. Conclusion: Nevertheless, cephalosporins display a relatively high resistance rate, necessitating a reduction in their clinical utilization. Regarding multidrug resistance, the detection of ESBLs-producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae (KP) and Carbapenem-Resistant KP (CR-Kp) has exhibited a declining trend over the past three years. Despite this positive trend, the issue of multidrug resistance in Klebsiella Pneumoniae remains severe, with instances of complete drug resistance reported. Clinicians are urged to judiciously administer antibiotics guided by drug sensitivity test results and resistance rate variations, restrict the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and manage the emergence and spread of ESBLs-producing and CR-Kp bacteria.","PeriodicalId":10889,"journal":{"name":"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Clinical Distribution and Antimicrobial Resistance of Klebsiella Pneumoniae\",\"authors\":\"Liping Xie, Zhen’an Wu, Na Wei, Liang Zhang, Jiajian Tang, Hongmei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734129306621240813074201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This paper aims to analyze the clinical distribution and drug resistance changes of Klebsiella Pneumoniae (KPN) from 2017 to 2021 in the Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine to provide a reference for the clinical rational use of antibiotics. Methods: We collected Klebsiella Pneumoniae isolated from various clinical specimens in 2017-2021, analyzed the isolation rate, specimen distribution, and department distribution characteristics during the five years, and statistically analyzed their drug sensitivity tests and multiple drug resistance. Zhuhai Deere DL-96 full-automatic microbial analyzer was used for bacterial identification and drug sensitivity tests. The drug sensitivity test was interpreted according to the standards recommended by the American Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Results: A total of 1057 strains of Klebsiella Pneumoniae were identified between 2017 and 2021, with proportions of 18.6%, 15.7%, 15.4%, 15.1%, and 15.0% in each respective year. Specimen distribution included sputum (66.0%), urine (17.9%), throat swab (9.4%), secretion (2.4%), pus (0.7%), venous blood (0.6%), vaginal swab (0.4%), and other sources (2.6%). Distribution by the department revealed specimens originating from the respiratory department (21.2%), cardiology department (17.8%), neurology department (13.4%), oncology department (13.0%), nephrology department (12.2%), acupuncture department (10.1%), and other departments (12.3%). In terms of drug susceptibility testing, Klebsiella Pneumoniae exhibited high resistance rates to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and ampicillin/sulbactam, with rates of 50.8%, 46.8%, 46.3%, and 43.6% respectively. Conversely, resistance rates to minocycline, amikacin, imipenem, and meropenem were relatively low, at 8.6%, 16.5%, 8.5%, and 9.4% respectively. Resistance rates to cefepime/- sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam were 29.9% and 28.9%, respectively, while cephalosporin resistance rates ranged from 36.1% to 50.8%. Regarding multidrug resistance, the detection rates of ESBL-producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae were 8.2%, 10.9%, 4.5%, 10.6%, and 6.4% from 2017 to 2021, with an average detection rate of 7.9%. The detection rates of CR-Kp were 12.1%, 11.7%, 5.8%, 9.9%, and 8.9% respectively, averaging 9.6% over the five-year period. Conclusion: The sputum specimen of Klebsiella Pneumoniae exhibits the highest detection rate among specimen distributions, signifying its significance as a pathogenic bacterium in respiratory tract infections. Notably, the respiratory department demonstrates the highest detection rate, underscoring the necessity to enhance the monitoring and management of Klebsiella Pneumoniae infections in respiratory patients. Over the past five years, our hospital has observed a decreasing trend in the overall drug resistance rate of Klebsiella Pneumoniae to 17 antibiotics. While imipenem and meropenem exhibit minimal resistance rates, these carbapenem antibiotics serve as crucial agents for treating gram-negative bacilli, particularly in critically ill patients, and are thus not recommended as first-line choices for routine clinical use. Conversely, minocycline, amikacin, ceftazidime/ sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam showcase relatively low resistance rates, enabling their empirical use based on clinical experience. Combination therapy with other antibiotics is advised for amikacin. Conclusion: Nevertheless, cephalosporins display a relatively high resistance rate, necessitating a reduction in their clinical utilization. Regarding multidrug resistance, the detection of ESBLs-producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae (KP) and Carbapenem-Resistant KP (CR-Kp) has exhibited a declining trend over the past three years. Despite this positive trend, the issue of multidrug resistance in Klebsiella Pneumoniae remains severe, with instances of complete drug resistance reported. Clinicians are urged to judiciously administer antibiotics guided by drug sensitivity test results and resistance rate variations, restrict the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and manage the emergence and spread of ESBLs-producing and CR-Kp bacteria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734129306621240813074201\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734129306621240813074201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文旨在分析2017-2021年北京中西医结合医院肺炎克雷伯菌(KPN)的临床分布及耐药性变化,为临床合理使用抗生素提供参考。方法:收集2017-2021年从各类临床标本中分离的肺炎克雷伯菌,分析5年间的分离率、标本分布、科室分布特点,统计分析其药敏试验及多重耐药性。采用珠海迪尔DL-96全自动微生物分析仪进行细菌鉴定和药敏试验。药敏试验按照美国临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)推荐的标准进行解释。结果2017年至2021年间,共鉴定出1057株肺炎克雷伯氏菌,每年的比例分别为18.6%、15.7%、15.4%、15.1%和15.0%。标本分布包括痰(66.0%)、尿(17.9%)、咽拭子(9.4%)、分泌物(2.4%)、脓液(0.7%)、静脉血(0.6%)、阴道拭子(0.4%)和其他来源(2.6%)。按科室分布,标本来自呼吸科(21.2%)、心内科(17.8%)、神经内科(13.4%)、肿瘤科(13.0%)、肾内科(12.2%)、针灸科(10.1%)和其他科室(12.3%)。在药敏试验方面,肺炎克雷伯菌对头孢曲松、头孢他啶、头孢唑肟和氨苄西林/舒巴坦的耐药率较高,分别为 50.8%、46.8%、46.3% 和 43.6%。相反,米诺环素、阿米卡星、亚胺培南和美罗培南的耐药率相对较低,分别为 8.6%、16.5%、8.5% 和 9.4%。对头孢吡肟/舒巴坦和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的耐药率分别为 29.9% 和 28.9%,而对头孢菌素的耐药率为 36.1% 至 50.8%。在多重耐药方面,2017年至2021年,产ESBL肺炎克雷伯菌的检出率分别为8.2%、10.9%、4.5%、10.6%和6.4%,平均检出率为7.9%。CR-Kp的检出率分别为12.1%、11.7%、5.8%、9.9%和8.9%,五年内平均检出率为9.6%。结论痰标本中肺炎克雷伯氏菌的检出率最高,这表明肺炎克雷伯氏菌是呼吸道感染的重要致病菌。值得注意的是,呼吸科的检出率最高,这说明有必要加强对呼吸科病人肺炎克雷伯菌感染的监测和管理。在过去五年中,我院观察到肺炎克雷伯氏菌对 17 种抗生素的总体耐药率呈下降趋势。虽然亚胺培南和美罗培南的耐药率极低,但这些碳青霉烯类抗生素是治疗革兰氏阴性杆菌(尤其是重症患者)的关键药物,因此不建议作为临床常规用药的一线选择。相反,米诺环素、阿米卡星、头孢唑肟/舒巴坦和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的耐药率相对较低,可根据临床经验使用。建议阿米卡星与其他抗生素联合使用。结论不过,头孢菌素的耐药率相对较高,因此有必要减少其临床使用。在多重耐药性方面,过去三年中检测到的产ESBLs肺炎克雷伯氏菌(KP)和耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯氏菌(CR-Kp)呈下降趋势。尽管出现了这一积极趋势,但肺炎克雷伯氏菌对多种药物产生耐药性的问题依然严重,有报道称出现了完全耐药的情况。临床医生应根据药敏试验结果和耐药率的变化明智地使用抗生素,限制广谱抗生素的使用,并控制产生 ESBLs 和 CR-Kp 细菌的出现和传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Clinical Distribution and Antimicrobial Resistance of Klebsiella Pneumoniae
Purpose: This paper aims to analyze the clinical distribution and drug resistance changes of Klebsiella Pneumoniae (KPN) from 2017 to 2021 in the Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine to provide a reference for the clinical rational use of antibiotics. Methods: We collected Klebsiella Pneumoniae isolated from various clinical specimens in 2017-2021, analyzed the isolation rate, specimen distribution, and department distribution characteristics during the five years, and statistically analyzed their drug sensitivity tests and multiple drug resistance. Zhuhai Deere DL-96 full-automatic microbial analyzer was used for bacterial identification and drug sensitivity tests. The drug sensitivity test was interpreted according to the standards recommended by the American Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Results: A total of 1057 strains of Klebsiella Pneumoniae were identified between 2017 and 2021, with proportions of 18.6%, 15.7%, 15.4%, 15.1%, and 15.0% in each respective year. Specimen distribution included sputum (66.0%), urine (17.9%), throat swab (9.4%), secretion (2.4%), pus (0.7%), venous blood (0.6%), vaginal swab (0.4%), and other sources (2.6%). Distribution by the department revealed specimens originating from the respiratory department (21.2%), cardiology department (17.8%), neurology department (13.4%), oncology department (13.0%), nephrology department (12.2%), acupuncture department (10.1%), and other departments (12.3%). In terms of drug susceptibility testing, Klebsiella Pneumoniae exhibited high resistance rates to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and ampicillin/sulbactam, with rates of 50.8%, 46.8%, 46.3%, and 43.6% respectively. Conversely, resistance rates to minocycline, amikacin, imipenem, and meropenem were relatively low, at 8.6%, 16.5%, 8.5%, and 9.4% respectively. Resistance rates to cefepime/- sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam were 29.9% and 28.9%, respectively, while cephalosporin resistance rates ranged from 36.1% to 50.8%. Regarding multidrug resistance, the detection rates of ESBL-producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae were 8.2%, 10.9%, 4.5%, 10.6%, and 6.4% from 2017 to 2021, with an average detection rate of 7.9%. The detection rates of CR-Kp were 12.1%, 11.7%, 5.8%, 9.9%, and 8.9% respectively, averaging 9.6% over the five-year period. Conclusion: The sputum specimen of Klebsiella Pneumoniae exhibits the highest detection rate among specimen distributions, signifying its significance as a pathogenic bacterium in respiratory tract infections. Notably, the respiratory department demonstrates the highest detection rate, underscoring the necessity to enhance the monitoring and management of Klebsiella Pneumoniae infections in respiratory patients. Over the past five years, our hospital has observed a decreasing trend in the overall drug resistance rate of Klebsiella Pneumoniae to 17 antibiotics. While imipenem and meropenem exhibit minimal resistance rates, these carbapenem antibiotics serve as crucial agents for treating gram-negative bacilli, particularly in critically ill patients, and are thus not recommended as first-line choices for routine clinical use. Conversely, minocycline, amikacin, ceftazidime/ sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam showcase relatively low resistance rates, enabling their empirical use based on clinical experience. Combination therapy with other antibiotics is advised for amikacin. Conclusion: Nevertheless, cephalosporins display a relatively high resistance rate, necessitating a reduction in their clinical utilization. Regarding multidrug resistance, the detection of ESBLs-producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae (KP) and Carbapenem-Resistant KP (CR-Kp) has exhibited a declining trend over the past three years. Despite this positive trend, the issue of multidrug resistance in Klebsiella Pneumoniae remains severe, with instances of complete drug resistance reported. Clinicians are urged to judiciously administer antibiotics guided by drug sensitivity test results and resistance rate variations, restrict the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and manage the emergence and spread of ESBLs-producing and CR-Kp bacteria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope Current Pharmaceutical Analysis publishes expert reviews and original research articles on all the most recent advances in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. All aspects of the field are represented including drug analysis, analytical methodology and instrumentation. The journal is essential to all involved in pharmaceutical, biochemical and clinical analysis.
期刊最新文献
Simultaneous Estimation of Pregabalin and Duloxetine Used to Treat Nerve Pain by Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Using the QBD Approach Research on Compatibility of Packaging Materials of High-Risk Cephalosporin Powder Injection and Establishment of Indicator Component Evaluation Method Universally Applicable Methods for Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Elemental Impurities in Vitamin A and D Preparations An Overview of Biotechnological Drug’s Various Techniques of Downstream Process, Guideline’s And Different Chromatographic Analysis Validation of GF-AAS Method for the Determination of Aluminium Content in Human Albumin Finished Product
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1