{"title":"在接受机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术的极高危前列腺癌患者中,新辅助化疗激素疗法结合醋酸地加瑞克的磷酸雌莫司汀剂量依从性可预测生化复发情况","authors":"Takanari Kambe, Toshinari Yamasaki, Akihiro Yamamoto, Akihiko Nagoshi, Tasuku Fujiwara, Yuta Mine, Hiroki Hagimoto, Atsushi Igarashi, Hidetoshi Kokubun, Shiori Murata, Naoki Akagi, Yuto Hattori, Yohei Abe, Naofumi Tsutsumi, Noboru Shibasaki, Mutsushi Kawakita","doi":"10.1111/iju.15579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant degarelix acetate and low‐dose estramustine phosphate for high−/very high‐risk prostate cancer.MethodsOverall, 187 patients diagnosed with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high−/very high‐risk cTanyN0M0 localized prostate cancer who consented to undergo robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy after receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for 6 months were prospectively enrolled between December 2017 and March 2023. Adverse events, perioperative and histopathological outcomes, and biochemical recurrence‐free survival rates were examined. Survival analysis compared the estramustine phosphate completion and reduction groups.ResultsThirty‐six patients discontinued neoadjuvant therapy in <5 months owing to adverse events (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 34) or other reasons (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 2). Eleven were excluded for being in the postoperative castration range. Of the 140 patients who underwent surgery, 124 continued with two tablets of estramustine phosphate and 16 with one tablet. Overall, 82 patients were very high‐risk. Histopathological outcomes were significantly worse in the very high‐risk group than those in the high‐risk group. Very high‐risk status and estramustine phosphate reduction were significant factors in biochemical recurrence in multivariate analysis. The biochemical recurrence‐free survival rate in very high‐risk patients was significantly lower in the estramustine phosphate dose reduction group than in the completion group but not significant in high‐risk patients. Major adverse events were anemia (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 174), elevated transaminase levels (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 68), and deep vein thrombosis (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 24). Severe adverse events included acute coronary syndrome (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 4) and pulmonary embolism (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 3).ConclusionsDose compliance with estramustine phosphate predicted biochemical recurrence in patients with very high‐risk prostate cancer undergoing robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy.","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose compliance of estramustine phosphate in neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy combined with degarelix acetate predicts the biochemical recurrence in patients with very high‐risk prostate cancer who underwent robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy\",\"authors\":\"Takanari Kambe, Toshinari Yamasaki, Akihiro Yamamoto, Akihiko Nagoshi, Tasuku Fujiwara, Yuta Mine, Hiroki Hagimoto, Atsushi Igarashi, Hidetoshi Kokubun, Shiori Murata, Naoki Akagi, Yuto Hattori, Yohei Abe, Naofumi Tsutsumi, Noboru Shibasaki, Mutsushi Kawakita\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iju.15579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant degarelix acetate and low‐dose estramustine phosphate for high−/very high‐risk prostate cancer.MethodsOverall, 187 patients diagnosed with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high−/very high‐risk cTanyN0M0 localized prostate cancer who consented to undergo robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy after receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for 6 months were prospectively enrolled between December 2017 and March 2023. Adverse events, perioperative and histopathological outcomes, and biochemical recurrence‐free survival rates were examined. Survival analysis compared the estramustine phosphate completion and reduction groups.ResultsThirty‐six patients discontinued neoadjuvant therapy in <5 months owing to adverse events (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 34) or other reasons (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 2). Eleven were excluded for being in the postoperative castration range. Of the 140 patients who underwent surgery, 124 continued with two tablets of estramustine phosphate and 16 with one tablet. Overall, 82 patients were very high‐risk. Histopathological outcomes were significantly worse in the very high‐risk group than those in the high‐risk group. Very high‐risk status and estramustine phosphate reduction were significant factors in biochemical recurrence in multivariate analysis. The biochemical recurrence‐free survival rate in very high‐risk patients was significantly lower in the estramustine phosphate dose reduction group than in the completion group but not significant in high‐risk patients. Major adverse events were anemia (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 174), elevated transaminase levels (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 68), and deep vein thrombosis (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 24). Severe adverse events included acute coronary syndrome (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 4) and pulmonary embolism (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 3).ConclusionsDose compliance with estramustine phosphate predicted biochemical recurrence in patients with very high‐risk prostate cancer undergoing robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15579\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15579","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dose compliance of estramustine phosphate in neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy combined with degarelix acetate predicts the biochemical recurrence in patients with very high‐risk prostate cancer who underwent robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant degarelix acetate and low‐dose estramustine phosphate for high−/very high‐risk prostate cancer.MethodsOverall, 187 patients diagnosed with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high−/very high‐risk cTanyN0M0 localized prostate cancer who consented to undergo robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy after receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for 6 months were prospectively enrolled between December 2017 and March 2023. Adverse events, perioperative and histopathological outcomes, and biochemical recurrence‐free survival rates were examined. Survival analysis compared the estramustine phosphate completion and reduction groups.ResultsThirty‐six patients discontinued neoadjuvant therapy in <5 months owing to adverse events (n = 34) or other reasons (n = 2). Eleven were excluded for being in the postoperative castration range. Of the 140 patients who underwent surgery, 124 continued with two tablets of estramustine phosphate and 16 with one tablet. Overall, 82 patients were very high‐risk. Histopathological outcomes were significantly worse in the very high‐risk group than those in the high‐risk group. Very high‐risk status and estramustine phosphate reduction were significant factors in biochemical recurrence in multivariate analysis. The biochemical recurrence‐free survival rate in very high‐risk patients was significantly lower in the estramustine phosphate dose reduction group than in the completion group but not significant in high‐risk patients. Major adverse events were anemia (n = 174), elevated transaminase levels (n = 68), and deep vein thrombosis (n = 24). Severe adverse events included acute coronary syndrome (n = 4) and pulmonary embolism (n = 3).ConclusionsDose compliance with estramustine phosphate predicted biochemical recurrence in patients with very high‐risk prostate cancer undergoing robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.