从奥运会角度质疑大型语言模型的内部知识结构

Juhwan Choi, YoungBin Kim
{"title":"从奥运会角度质疑大型语言模型的内部知识结构","authors":"Juhwan Choi, YoungBin Kim","doi":"arxiv-2409.06518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large language models (LLMs) have become a dominant approach in natural\nlanguage processing, yet their internal knowledge structures remain largely\nunexplored. In this paper, we analyze the internal knowledge structures of LLMs\nusing historical medal tallies from the Olympic Games. We task the models with\nproviding the medal counts for each team and identifying which teams achieved\nspecific rankings. Our results reveal that while state-of-the-art LLMs perform\nremarkably well in reporting medal counts for individual teams, they struggle\nsignificantly with questions about specific rankings. This suggests that the\ninternal knowledge structures of LLMs are fundamentally different from those of\nhumans, who can easily infer rankings from known medal counts. To support\nfurther research, we publicly release our code, dataset, and model outputs.","PeriodicalId":501030,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computation and Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning Internal Knowledge Structure of Large Language Models Through the Lens of the Olympic Games\",\"authors\":\"Juhwan Choi, YoungBin Kim\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.06518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Large language models (LLMs) have become a dominant approach in natural\\nlanguage processing, yet their internal knowledge structures remain largely\\nunexplored. In this paper, we analyze the internal knowledge structures of LLMs\\nusing historical medal tallies from the Olympic Games. We task the models with\\nproviding the medal counts for each team and identifying which teams achieved\\nspecific rankings. Our results reveal that while state-of-the-art LLMs perform\\nremarkably well in reporting medal counts for individual teams, they struggle\\nsignificantly with questions about specific rankings. This suggests that the\\ninternal knowledge structures of LLMs are fundamentally different from those of\\nhumans, who can easily infer rankings from known medal counts. To support\\nfurther research, we publicly release our code, dataset, and model outputs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computation and Language\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computation and Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computation and Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型语言模型(LLM)已成为自然语言处理领域的主流方法,但其内部知识结构在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在本文中,我们利用奥运会的历史奖牌总数分析了 LLMs 的内部知识结构。我们要求模型提供每支队伍的奖牌数,并识别哪些队伍获得了特定排名。我们的结果表明,尽管最先进的 LLM 在报告单个团队的奖牌数方面表现出色,但在具体排名问题上却表现得非常吃力。这表明,LLM 的内部知识结构与人类的知识结构有本质区别,人类可以轻松地从已知的奖牌数推断出排名。为了支持进一步的研究,我们公开发布了我们的代码、数据集和模型输出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Questioning Internal Knowledge Structure of Large Language Models Through the Lens of the Olympic Games
Large language models (LLMs) have become a dominant approach in natural language processing, yet their internal knowledge structures remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we analyze the internal knowledge structures of LLMs using historical medal tallies from the Olympic Games. We task the models with providing the medal counts for each team and identifying which teams achieved specific rankings. Our results reveal that while state-of-the-art LLMs perform remarkably well in reporting medal counts for individual teams, they struggle significantly with questions about specific rankings. This suggests that the internal knowledge structures of LLMs are fundamentally different from those of humans, who can easily infer rankings from known medal counts. To support further research, we publicly release our code, dataset, and model outputs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LLMs + Persona-Plug = Personalized LLMs MEOW: MEMOry Supervised LLM Unlearning Via Inverted Facts Extract-and-Abstract: Unifying Extractive and Abstractive Summarization within Single Encoder-Decoder Framework Development and bilingual evaluation of Japanese medical large language model within reasonably low computational resources Human-like Affective Cognition in Foundation Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1