报道精神疾病和自杀的经历:对澳大利亚新闻专业人员的采访结果

IF 2.7 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journalism Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1177/14648849241274105
Anna M Ross, Kara Dickson, Amy J Morgan, Elizabeth Paton, Gayle McNaught, Nicola J Reavley
{"title":"报道精神疾病和自杀的经历:对澳大利亚新闻专业人员的采访结果","authors":"Anna M Ross, Kara Dickson, Amy J Morgan, Elizabeth Paton, Gayle McNaught, Nicola J Reavley","doi":"10.1177/14648849241274105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improvements in the quality of news portrayals of mental illness and suicide can be attributed to the introduction of media guidelines, particularly the Mindframe guidelines in Australia. However, based on reports about problematic media content, there remains scope for improvement. This study sought to further investigate the experiences of Australian news media professionals in reporting on mental illness and suicide, including their experiences of using the Mindframe guidelines and developing news stories about people with lived experience. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 media professionals, including junior reporters, senior reporters, and news editors. Media professionals had an average of 10.1 years’ (SD = 9.4) experience and represented a range of work experiences. Three key themes were generated from participant responses about their experiences reporting on mental illness and suicide: 1. Awareness of responsible reporting guidelines and how to proactively increase this; 2. Newsroom processes, values and subjectivity in applying guidelines; and 3. The importance and challenge in sharing lived experience stories, and improving support for covering these stories. Further resources and education are needed across newsrooms and universities to increase awareness and use of the Mindframe guidelines, and ultimately improve the quality of Australian media portrayals of mental illness and suicide. Editors and managers should be targeted with this training to best influence organisational change. Media professionals require additional preparation and support to develop lived experience stories, particularly in working with people bereaved by suicide to ensure this is a safe engagement for both parties.","PeriodicalId":51432,"journal":{"name":"Journalism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences reporting on mental illness and suicide: Findings from interviews with Australian news professionals\",\"authors\":\"Anna M Ross, Kara Dickson, Amy J Morgan, Elizabeth Paton, Gayle McNaught, Nicola J Reavley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14648849241274105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Improvements in the quality of news portrayals of mental illness and suicide can be attributed to the introduction of media guidelines, particularly the Mindframe guidelines in Australia. However, based on reports about problematic media content, there remains scope for improvement. This study sought to further investigate the experiences of Australian news media professionals in reporting on mental illness and suicide, including their experiences of using the Mindframe guidelines and developing news stories about people with lived experience. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 media professionals, including junior reporters, senior reporters, and news editors. Media professionals had an average of 10.1 years’ (SD = 9.4) experience and represented a range of work experiences. Three key themes were generated from participant responses about their experiences reporting on mental illness and suicide: 1. Awareness of responsible reporting guidelines and how to proactively increase this; 2. Newsroom processes, values and subjectivity in applying guidelines; and 3. The importance and challenge in sharing lived experience stories, and improving support for covering these stories. Further resources and education are needed across newsrooms and universities to increase awareness and use of the Mindframe guidelines, and ultimately improve the quality of Australian media portrayals of mental illness and suicide. Editors and managers should be targeted with this training to best influence organisational change. Media professionals require additional preparation and support to develop lived experience stories, particularly in working with people bereaved by suicide to ensure this is a safe engagement for both parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journalism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241274105\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241274105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关精神疾病和自杀的新闻报道质量的提高可归功于媒体指导方针的出台,尤其是澳大利亚的 "心灵框架 "指导方针。然而,根据有关问题媒体内容的报道,仍有改进的余地。本研究旨在进一步调查澳大利亚新闻媒体专业人员在报道精神疾病和自杀方面的经验,包括他们在使用 Mindframe 指南和编写关于有亲身经历者的新闻报道方面的经验。我们对 12 名媒体从业人员进行了半结构化采访,其中包括初级记者、高级记者和新闻编辑。媒体从业人员的平均工作年限为 10.1 年(SD = 9.4),代表了不同的工作经验。从受访者关于精神疾病和自杀报道经验的回答中,我们发现了三个关键主题:1.对负责任的报道准则的认识以及如何积极主动地提高这一认识;2. 新闻编辑室的流程、价值观以及在应用准则时的主观性;3.分享亲身经历故事的重要性和挑战性,以及改善对报道这些故事的支持。各新闻编辑室和大学都需要更多的资源和教育,以提高对 Mindframe 指南的认识和使用,并最终提高澳大利亚媒体对精神疾病和自杀报道的质量。应针对编辑和管理人员开展此类培训,以便更好地影响组织变革。媒体专业人员需要更多的准备和支持,以开发生活经验故事,尤其是在与自杀遗属合作时,以确保双方都能安全地参与其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences reporting on mental illness and suicide: Findings from interviews with Australian news professionals
Improvements in the quality of news portrayals of mental illness and suicide can be attributed to the introduction of media guidelines, particularly the Mindframe guidelines in Australia. However, based on reports about problematic media content, there remains scope for improvement. This study sought to further investigate the experiences of Australian news media professionals in reporting on mental illness and suicide, including their experiences of using the Mindframe guidelines and developing news stories about people with lived experience. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 media professionals, including junior reporters, senior reporters, and news editors. Media professionals had an average of 10.1 years’ (SD = 9.4) experience and represented a range of work experiences. Three key themes were generated from participant responses about their experiences reporting on mental illness and suicide: 1. Awareness of responsible reporting guidelines and how to proactively increase this; 2. Newsroom processes, values and subjectivity in applying guidelines; and 3. The importance and challenge in sharing lived experience stories, and improving support for covering these stories. Further resources and education are needed across newsrooms and universities to increase awareness and use of the Mindframe guidelines, and ultimately improve the quality of Australian media portrayals of mental illness and suicide. Editors and managers should be targeted with this training to best influence organisational change. Media professionals require additional preparation and support to develop lived experience stories, particularly in working with people bereaved by suicide to ensure this is a safe engagement for both parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journalism
Journalism COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Journalism is a major international, peer-reviewed journal that provides a dedicated forum for articles from the growing community of academic researchers and critical practitioners with an interest in journalism. The journal is interdisciplinary and publishes both theoretical and empirical work and contributes to the social, economic, political, cultural and practical understanding of journalism. It includes contributions on current developments and historical changes within journalism.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge can wait? The epistemic conversion of new beat reporters Behind the black box: The moderating role of the machine heuristic on the effect of transparency information about automated journalism on hostile media bias perception Citizen journalism revisited: A case study of Kenya’s kibera news network (De)politicization of the environmental agenda in Russian media Why media platforms police the boundaries of impartiality: A comparative analysis of television news and fact-checking in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1