{"title":"非确定性亚指数时间之外的无最优证明系统的 Oracle","authors":"Fabian Egidy, Christian Glaßer","doi":"arxiv-2408.07408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the existence of optimal proof systems for sets outside of\n$\\mathrm{NP}$. Currently, no set $L \\notin \\mathrm{NP}$ is known that has\noptimal proof systems. Our main result shows that this is not surprising,\nbecause we can rule out relativizable proofs of optimality for all sets outside\n$\\mathrm{NTIME}(t)$ where $t$ is slightly superpolynomial. We construct an\noracle $O$, such that for any set $L \\subseteq \\Sigma^*$ at least one of the\nfollowing two properties holds: $L$ does not have optimal proof systems\nrelative to $O$. $L \\in \\mathrm{UTIME}^O(2^{2(\\log\nn)^{8+4\\log(\\log(\\log(n)))}})$. The runtime bound is slightly superpolynomial.\nSo there is no relativizable proof showing that a complex set has optimal proof\nsystems. Hence, searching for non-trivial optimal proof systems with\nrelativizable methods can only be successful (if at all) in a narrow range\nabove $\\mathrm{NP}$.","PeriodicalId":501024,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oracle without Optimal Proof Systems outside Nondeterministic Subexponential Time\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Egidy, Christian Glaßer\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.07408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the existence of optimal proof systems for sets outside of\\n$\\\\mathrm{NP}$. Currently, no set $L \\\\notin \\\\mathrm{NP}$ is known that has\\noptimal proof systems. Our main result shows that this is not surprising,\\nbecause we can rule out relativizable proofs of optimality for all sets outside\\n$\\\\mathrm{NTIME}(t)$ where $t$ is slightly superpolynomial. We construct an\\noracle $O$, such that for any set $L \\\\subseteq \\\\Sigma^*$ at least one of the\\nfollowing two properties holds: $L$ does not have optimal proof systems\\nrelative to $O$. $L \\\\in \\\\mathrm{UTIME}^O(2^{2(\\\\log\\nn)^{8+4\\\\log(\\\\log(\\\\log(n)))}})$. The runtime bound is slightly superpolynomial.\\nSo there is no relativizable proof showing that a complex set has optimal proof\\nsystems. Hence, searching for non-trivial optimal proof systems with\\nrelativizable methods can only be successful (if at all) in a narrow range\\nabove $\\\\mathrm{NP}$.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.07408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.07408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Oracle without Optimal Proof Systems outside Nondeterministic Subexponential Time
We study the existence of optimal proof systems for sets outside of
$\mathrm{NP}$. Currently, no set $L \notin \mathrm{NP}$ is known that has
optimal proof systems. Our main result shows that this is not surprising,
because we can rule out relativizable proofs of optimality for all sets outside
$\mathrm{NTIME}(t)$ where $t$ is slightly superpolynomial. We construct an
oracle $O$, such that for any set $L \subseteq \Sigma^*$ at least one of the
following two properties holds: $L$ does not have optimal proof systems
relative to $O$. $L \in \mathrm{UTIME}^O(2^{2(\log
n)^{8+4\log(\log(\log(n)))}})$. The runtime bound is slightly superpolynomial.
So there is no relativizable proof showing that a complex set has optimal proof
systems. Hence, searching for non-trivial optimal proof systems with
relativizable methods can only be successful (if at all) in a narrow range
above $\mathrm{NP}$.