5-单硝酸异山梨酯与缓释硝酸异山梨酯治疗缺血性心脏病的临床比较研究。

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1986-01-01
R Neuhaus, R Johnen, L Vydra, C Solbach
{"title":"5-单硝酸异山梨酯与缓释硝酸异山梨酯治疗缺血性心脏病的临床比较研究。","authors":"R Neuhaus,&nbsp;R Johnen,&nbsp;L Vydra,&nbsp;C Solbach","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A double-blind crossover study, with placebo periods preceding each active treatment, was carried out in 29 patients with ischaemic heart disease to compare the clinical efficacy of isosorbide 5-mononitrate 40 mg twice daily and the same regimen of sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate. Assessment was by bicycle ergometry, symptomatology and blood nitrate level measurements. After 2-weeks' therapy with isosorbide 5-mononitrate, mean ST segment depression at the highest comparable exercise level for each patient was reduced by 32.5% (p less than 0.01), the mean maximum exercise level was increased from 87 to 102 Watts (17.8%, p less than 0.01), and mean work capacity was increased from 581 Watts-minutes to 783 Watts-minutes (34.6%, p less than 0.01). With sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate, ST segment depression was reduced by 16.5% (p less than 0.05); maximum exercise level showed only a small non-significant increase, from 89 to 97 Watts (8.6%), but work capacity increased (p less than 0.05) from 593 Watts-minutes to 705 Watts-minutes (18.9%). There was no significant difference between drugs as regards ST segment reduction but a slight difference in favour of isosorbide 5-mononitrate (p less than 0.05) in terms of maximal exercise level and work capacity. Both drugs resulted in very small reductions in blood pressure (p less than 0.001 for systolic with isosorbide 5-mononitrate; p less than 0.01 for systolic and p less than 0.05 for diastolic with sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate). Heart rate and rate-pressure product changed little with either drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"4 8","pages":"486-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative clinical trial of isosorbide 5-mononitrate and sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate in ischaemic heart disease.\",\"authors\":\"R Neuhaus,&nbsp;R Johnen,&nbsp;L Vydra,&nbsp;C Solbach\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A double-blind crossover study, with placebo periods preceding each active treatment, was carried out in 29 patients with ischaemic heart disease to compare the clinical efficacy of isosorbide 5-mononitrate 40 mg twice daily and the same regimen of sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate. Assessment was by bicycle ergometry, symptomatology and blood nitrate level measurements. After 2-weeks' therapy with isosorbide 5-mononitrate, mean ST segment depression at the highest comparable exercise level for each patient was reduced by 32.5% (p less than 0.01), the mean maximum exercise level was increased from 87 to 102 Watts (17.8%, p less than 0.01), and mean work capacity was increased from 581 Watts-minutes to 783 Watts-minutes (34.6%, p less than 0.01). With sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate, ST segment depression was reduced by 16.5% (p less than 0.05); maximum exercise level showed only a small non-significant increase, from 89 to 97 Watts (8.6%), but work capacity increased (p less than 0.05) from 593 Watts-minutes to 705 Watts-minutes (18.9%). There was no significant difference between drugs as regards ST segment reduction but a slight difference in favour of isosorbide 5-mononitrate (p less than 0.05) in terms of maximal exercise level and work capacity. Both drugs resulted in very small reductions in blood pressure (p less than 0.001 for systolic with isosorbide 5-mononitrate; p less than 0.01 for systolic and p less than 0.05 for diastolic with sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate). Heart rate and rate-pressure product changed little with either drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"volume\":\"4 8\",\"pages\":\"486-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在29例缺血性心脏病患者中进行了一项双盲交叉研究,在每次积极治疗之前都有安慰剂期,以比较5-单硝酸异山梨酯40 mg每日两次和相同方案的缓释硝酸异山梨酯的临床疗效。评估是通过自行车几何、症状和血液硝酸盐水平测量。用5-单硝酸异山梨酯治疗2周后,每位患者在最高可比较运动水平下的平均ST段抑郁降低了32.5% (p < 0.01),平均最大运动水平从87瓦增加到102瓦(17.8%,p < 0.01),平均工作能力从581瓦-分钟增加到783瓦-分钟(34.6%,p < 0.01)。硝酸异山梨酯缓释组ST段凹陷度降低16.5% (p < 0.05);最大运动水平仅从89瓦增加到97瓦(8.6%),但工作能力从593瓦-分钟增加到705瓦-分钟(18.9%),p < 0.05。两种药物在ST段缩短方面无显著差异,但异山梨酯5-单硝酸酯在最大运动水平和工作能力方面有轻微差异(p < 0.05)。两种药物都导致了非常小的血压降低(5-单硝酸异山梨酯组收缩压p < 0.001;收缩期P < 0.01,舒张期P < 0.05,缓释硝酸异山梨酯)。两种药物的心率和心率压变化不大。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative clinical trial of isosorbide 5-mononitrate and sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate in ischaemic heart disease.

A double-blind crossover study, with placebo periods preceding each active treatment, was carried out in 29 patients with ischaemic heart disease to compare the clinical efficacy of isosorbide 5-mononitrate 40 mg twice daily and the same regimen of sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate. Assessment was by bicycle ergometry, symptomatology and blood nitrate level measurements. After 2-weeks' therapy with isosorbide 5-mononitrate, mean ST segment depression at the highest comparable exercise level for each patient was reduced by 32.5% (p less than 0.01), the mean maximum exercise level was increased from 87 to 102 Watts (17.8%, p less than 0.01), and mean work capacity was increased from 581 Watts-minutes to 783 Watts-minutes (34.6%, p less than 0.01). With sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate, ST segment depression was reduced by 16.5% (p less than 0.05); maximum exercise level showed only a small non-significant increase, from 89 to 97 Watts (8.6%), but work capacity increased (p less than 0.05) from 593 Watts-minutes to 705 Watts-minutes (18.9%). There was no significant difference between drugs as regards ST segment reduction but a slight difference in favour of isosorbide 5-mononitrate (p less than 0.05) in terms of maximal exercise level and work capacity. Both drugs resulted in very small reductions in blood pressure (p less than 0.001 for systolic with isosorbide 5-mononitrate; p less than 0.01 for systolic and p less than 0.05 for diastolic with sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate). Heart rate and rate-pressure product changed little with either drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flupenthixol and fluvoxamine in mild to moderate depression: a comparison in general practice. Treatment of chronic occlusive arterial disease with pentoxifylline: changes in clinical and haemodynamic parameters. Effects of penbutolol on plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and antidiuretic hormone levels before and after exercise: a double-blind comparison against placebo. Absence of interaction between ramipril, a new ACE-inhibitor, and phenprocoumon, an anticoagulant agent. Zuclopenthixol and haloperidol/levomepromazine in the treatment of elderly patients with symptoms of aggressiveness and agitation: a double-blind, multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1